I've never heard of having or counting separate display panels as part of the refresh rate specs...
So-called LED TVs are actually LCD panels with LEDs for illumination rather than the usual cold-cathode fluorescent tubes.
It's theoretically possible the backlight has separate RGB LEDs rather than white LEDs, and the colours are displayed sequentially rather than simultaneously, to give better colour separation - but I doubt it..
The broadcast TV signal only uses 25Hz interlaced (50Hz alternating even/odd frames) update rate, so anything above 50Hz is using interpolation to create fill-in frames to reduce flicker.
100Hz is faster than the eye can manage anyway, so anything beyond that is fine.
One of my friends has just ordered the 6530, so I'll find out what the actual system is in a few days.
Edit:
They have the 6530 now, and it is definitely a very good set - I want one myself having seen it..
It's an edge-lit LCD, and very thin - not much more than an inch overall.
I've been thinking about the 'multiple panels' blurb. Liquid Crystal Displays are driven using a multiplex system where the rows and columns of the display are driven in combination to address pixels.
With all but tiny panels, multiple driver ICs are used and for each row addressed, several driver ICs will update the columns they control simultaneously (or vice-versa), so the overall update sequence is faster than if every single pixel had to be worked through one at a time.
It's standard technology in any LCD, and 100Hz update is still 100Hz update. But it sounds like some marketing people have 'discovered' it and are trying to put a spin on it. It makes about as much sense as saying a particular car is 4x faster as each wheel is doing whatever speed, 'but there are four of them!'..