What reasons do you have for getting or not getting HDTV?

Question

Are there certain channels you’re waiting for? What are some other things that will affect your decision?

Answer 1

Well, the only reason why I DO have an HDTV is because someone gave me a large-screen HDTV as a gift. The television sets tend to be very costly, especially for a single person on a budget!



But honestly, I must say that I LOVE MY HDTV and don't plan on giving up my HD service. The picture quality is totally awesome and the service is affordable (notice that I said the SERVICE is affordable, not the actual TV!).



What are the channels I'm waiting for? Uhm, how about ALL of the channels being converted to HD? The cable networks also need to convert ALL of the PPV channels to HD, too.



As service providers, I feel that our cable networks are not keeping pace with HD technology.



Since so many households now have HD service, then how come HD television channels and services are so limited?

Answer 2

I have an HDTV and I also work with pro HD every day. Most of the people that don't want to get an HDTV basically don't care enough about watching television to spend the money on an HDTV. For some, they don't even see the difference. I have read many answers that say their 32" Sony from 8 years ago is just fine which is basically saying they have no idea what HDTV really is. There is no comparison between an old 4x3 tube television and a 16x9 HDTV, there is a world of difference in quality, sound and the fact that you are seeing more of the picture while watching an HD broadcast. Also the answer about the letters HD just being a marketing tool and how we are not getting true HD and lets talk about HD when its defined. "HD" stands for high definition, 1080i, 720p, and 1080p are all high definition. 1080p is considered the highest of high definition but the difference between the three is not noticeable and anyone who claims they can see the difference is fooling themselves, it would be like saying you could see the flapping wings of a hummingbird, your eye is not that advanced to be able to tell any difference. The marketing tool would be plastering that sticker in the corner of every tv in your local best buy that says its 1080p. People want to know they are getting the very best, and yes 1080p is the very best but if you didn't have it, you wouldn't know it. There is the marketing nonsense. I like how they play the demo with the split screen of bluray and DVD to show how far superior bluray is, they make the DVD side look like old VHS, its so exaggerated its ridiculous and its all to make more money. Stations don't even broadcast in 1080p, they broadcast in 1080i and 720p, only bluray, PS3 and XBOX360 is 1080p. There are more and more HD channels all the time and more and more programs are being shot in HD. The colors are absolutely amazing when watching any nature shows or any live sporting events, and the audio is 5.1 surround sound, it doesn't get much better than that. Those of you reading this that think HD isn't that great or too much money and want to stick with that 10year old 4x3 TV need to do a little research about HD and go check out a tube tv next to an HDTV and you will see how far superior HD is and why its worth it.

Answer 3

Well, first of all, I have to agree with a lot of the other people who answered this exact same question: the number one factor that would forbid me to buying the HDTV is the high price. I mean, come on, with the way things are going in the economy, those TVs will be very expensive, especially if you're still looking for a job right now. Also, even though the picture would be clearer, it would still be the shows that would make the difference, just like it's actually the games that would really make or break the consoles. Because, it's the content of the shows that would determine the quality of entertainment. Of course, I would be waiting if G4 would ever jump to HDTV. My favourite show there is X-Play. Man, that Adam Sessler is annoyingly funny. Also, I still have to sort out the specifications that I would need for a perfect HDTV. That's all for now

Answer 4

Well, first of all, I have to agree with a lot of the other people who answered this exact same question: the number one factor that would forbid me to buying the HDTV is the high price. I mean, come on, with the way things are going in the economy, those TVs will be very expensive, especially if you're still looking for a job right now. Also, even though the picture would be clearer, it would still be the shows that would make the difference, just like it's actually the games that would really make or break the consoles. Because, it's the content of the shows that would determine the quality of entertainment. Of course, I would be waiting if G4 would ever jump to HDTV. My favourite show there is X-Play. Man, that Adam Sessler is annoyingly funny. Also, I still have to sort out the specifications that I would need for a perfect HDTV. That's all for now

Answer 5

First off, as a college student, I want a relatively cheap (somewhere around $600 to $700) HDTV that is at least 32 inches.



Things that affect my decision (in order from greatest to least importance):

1) Price

2) Picture Quality

3) Screen Size

4) Audio Quality

5) Aesthetic appeal

6)HDMI connections (at least 3, but more wouldn't hurt)



Things that would increase my chances of buying a new HDTV:

1) Some kind of bundle with a decent sound system (preferably geared for console gaming and moves)

2) Lower cost





And here is an idea I think would be really neat in a TV:



1) a built in wireless media center (Like a built in Apple TV or Roku Soundbridge). This would be an awesome feature, that would allow people to stream their favorite movies, music, and pictures directly to their TV without another device to clutter everything up. Add this to a TV, and I would probably snap it up in no time flat.



And by the way, I think those new Sony OLED TV's are really cool (except FAR too expensive at this point)

Answer 6

I bought a cheap Sanyo HDTV and it looks good, sounds good... but is a throw-away consumer grade tv that won't last more than a few years tops. I will most definately buy another HDTV, but I think next time I am going to buy a professional grade with 1080i or better if it gets that good. I am already picking up some HD broadcasts from rabbit ears and the picture is spectacular. The weather really affects the quality far worse than anything I ever got with directv. The directv signal is really clear and I don't have an HD receiver. Best comparison is by way of DVD, if I watch it through the HDMI plug it looks far sharper than when watching through a video cable. All of my visitors are astounded when they see the network stations in HD off rabbit ears. Not too bad considering my set is a cheap consumer grade throw-away TV that can't even get a 1080i image.

Answer 7

One is the price, I want my TV to be bigger than 26 inches but I can't go out spending 700 or more on a TV set. So I'm waiting until they inevitably drop in price. As well I think they are horriffically over rated. Everytime I see a HDTV in a store, the screen looks blotchy and I don't see the increased quality at ALL. I don't know if theres something I should be looking for or am missing, but I think a majority of people are falling into the hype. The Picture is a little brighter but that doesn't do anything for the reduced quality, which contradicts the name, High Definition. I had heard that the reason I see it like this is because you need HDTV service to enjoy the HD experience, but I also heard that those blotches are standard and I should get used to them.



Beyond that, DVDs are getting cheaper and cheaper and Blu Ray and HD Movies are at LEAST 24 dollars each. I can't afford the luxuries of reduced quality on a more expensive TV. I don't care to.

Answer 8

Personally I think an HDTV is worth getting. I can't believe some people can't tell the difference when watching it compared to standard. But then again maybe they just watched 720i.



The one downfall to hdtv's are when you have cable your hd channels look awesome...but the sd channels appear a little fuzzy in comparison. Think of it as a tiny image on a computer and blowing it up to fit the screen. That's pretty much what it's doing.



I have a 1080p and I think it's worth every penny. Plus they are getting a lot cheaper than they were even last year. Also if blu rays are too expensive for you to get, they have some great dvd upconverters you can buy for a lot cheaper. It makes dvds look great on the big screen.

Answer 9

Clearly the answer is the cost.



The cost of an HDTV set is prohibitive. The cost of upgrading one’s cable service is only a little more to fit into the current marketing gimmick; keep the monthly cost down because the payments go on forever. We have arrived at a time when the cost of upgrading all of our electronics to the most up-to-date, highest resolution, and with all the latest bells and whistles has gone over the top. How much is this stuff worth to us? The days of paying whatever it costs to have the best electronic products available are over. Not only is the cost too high but the equipment and service is almost immediately obsolete. I personally feel like the industry is aware that they have squeezed every last penny out me so they are now chipping away at me at “a mere $10 a month” (forever) for HD service. I have reached my saturation point and am not going to pay only $10 a month and that regular old TV resolution that I have been watching my whole life is just fine thank you very much.



How about improving TV programming?

Answer 10

We need to convert by February 2009 or get a converter box for our older analog TVs. The new HDTV screens are wider and match the format of the newer movie videos. The HDTVs have better clarity on the picture than the more fuzzy analog TVs. Right now, not all channels are being broadcast in the digital, some channels are still analog now. The price is still expensive when the old TV still works ok. It's a personal decision on affordability and what programs you watch. The government is giving a free coupon for a converter box, so if you keep your TV you could get one of the coupons to get a discount on the converter. There is also an up-converter box to upconvert your DVD player to HDTV format.

If you use an antenna with your older TV, you will need to get a newer digital antenna to get the digital programming for the new HDTV and enjoy digital programs.

Answer 11

Because HD should already be included with whatever package you purchase from your local company. Before getting my cable/satellite, I've had both, I used to watch regular TV and the picture on that was better than either the cable or satellite company gave me. If local TV station can do it for free then certaintly a large company like TimeWarner, Verizon or Charter can provie HDTV for some of it's channels, at least for the channnels like ABC, CBS, FOX, etc...



I don't think it's practical to pay extra for a better picture, because it doesn't truly change the enjoyment of watching tv, if the quality of the programming is bad then HDTV can't do a thing, and if it's good then you'll watch your favorite shows whether you have HDTV or not.

Answer 12

I have an HDTV and have HD Direct TV. It is sooo not worth the extra money. First had I known that Direct TV cost and extra 10$ per month for HD I would not have gotten one. Second Direct TV now has me in a 2 year contract for HD and it is not really any better than the regular channels. I don't care for the sound, the picture, and the fact that some channels you lose at least 3 inches off each side of the TV making the video no different from a regular square TV. My opinion is suck and it sucks bad.

Answer 13

More Quality! More Size! More Enjoying! More Fun With Games! More Responsibility! More Picture Stability! i think that's enough , lets have some examples :

Movies can be watched with these SD TVs, but when you do a comparison with HD versions, that's when you feel that you have lost a lot...

in science: when you have more pixel in the picture , you can do more detection on that matter!

In gaming: well , if you have another player by your side , but there is only one console and one TV , so , a standard tv ( no matter how much it's big) it's not responsible for being split. normally u are losing so much pixels ( about half ) on SDTV! how could it feel to be more losing pixels! at the end you have one-fourth of all pixels ( it's about 720p scanning! in 1080p scannings , situation is 2x worse )...

about education! it's so clear : More pixels = More Size = More Distance it can be watched = Much bigger your class will be = less complaint there will be = better class...



as a user , a have all these experiment! My dad is a scientist and a doctor! My mom is a teacher! me and my bro are gamers and watch movies so much!

and there is something i forgot : when you need more workspace than your monitor presents to you or you have get tired by sitting behind pc it's exactly when a big HDTV ( that absolutely have a PC input ) in your restroom can help you very much! and a home-theater can complete your enjoyment...



there is something that i should tell you : never ever by Projection HD TV's! I've experienced all type of HDTV's. i prefer LCD types! Plasma ones are also good, but , as a pro-user , I prefer that one !

It's about 6am here and i am so sleepy and also can't feel my left hand! so proofs will stay for later...

And sorry for my English ! You know , i'm teaching myself :D

Answer 14

I got an HDTV because they're more compact, have better resolution for HD television, movies, and video games, and they make great computer monitors when you don't have a desk, but a wireless keyboard and mouse.



The only thing that most people will say they do not like about HDTVs is the price. As an additional thought, there's no standard for resolution on any TV. Each company sets their own as long as they can display the current standard definitions of 720p, 1080i, and 1080p. This is why on some TVs they have a ratio of 250,000:1 vs. the same size TV with a ratio of 2,000:1. I'd like to see more standardization before I decide to purchase a second HDTV.

Answer 15

Cost. Also living in a small house with two people, one of which is a blind person, the amount of money going into the screen when only one person can see it, vs the sound aspects, affects choices.

I am very bitter that none of the non-broadcast services allow me to pick a set of channels that we want to watch while forcing me to take channels that I am told are major contributors to the cost of the service - I don't want sports crammed down my throat while having to pick up 6 unwanted channels to get National Geographic as part of a Golden service.

I would much prefer getting a Family pack or Custom choosing that included History, Discovery, National Geographic, PBS, CNN, Weather, and similar choices and omitted all the various ESPN spinoffs, NFL, Big 10, and whatever else is out there. I might even be willing to pay a bit more than Basic service, although getting only 30 channels I wanted instead of 300 I don't should actually cost less.

I'll stay with broadcast.

Answer 16

The BIGGEST Factor (as to whether or not to get HDTV) for myself (as well as the majority of Households) is the BUDGET ...



Being a Long Term Single ... someone who paid off a punishing Divorce Settlement, and raised my TWO Disabled Children from Toddlerhood to adulthood (and beyond) ... I can say this --



AS the ONLY Household income -- I have priorities in my BUDGET -- and ... quite frankly -- replacing TVs (with the latest whiz-bang device) ... or Cars ... or anything else DEPENDS on the item BREAKING in the first place -- because I do NOT have the luxury of an unlimited budget!



So with my priorities firmly in place (Take care of the necessities -- put some money on the side ... and make sure everything is maintained) ... and the fact that now as an Empty-Nesting Single Retiree I (in REALITY) do not watch TV much at all (and the only viewing I do is of the collection of DVDs that I've purchased of the 'oldies') ...



I am NOT pressed to make any more purchases at this time.



Last year, I treated myself to the BIGGEST TV I ever have had in my home -- a 42" plasma for my Great Room. I have no need of any further TVs or anything else (it so happens that the Plasma was HD).

Answer 17

I'd like to say as my TVs die, I'll replace them with a modern TV. Unfortunately with the DTV switch, it will end up being sooner than that. I currently have a 42" Samsung HDTV that replaced a dead 27" Zenith CRT style TV. I also have a 12" (don't even know the brand) TV in our kitchen that still uses "rabbit ears". I guess that one will need to be replaced early 2009 or I'll have to get a converter box.



As for HDTV service, I do have Verizon FiOS, but only the standard set top box. My family doesn't watch enough TV to really make getting the premium cost of HD service worth while. For me, the I honestly tend to watch the 12" TV more than our 42" TV. I have the Simpsons, local news, or maybe sit com on in the kitchen. If I'm at the 42" TV, I'm probably watching a DVD movie, the Steeler game, or a rare look at the upper movie channels when nothing else is going on for me. Out of all of these, maybe the only thing that would really look best would be the Steeler game in HD. I just don't see a need for increasing the picture quality when what I see now appears pretty good to me. I have no intention of going to BluRay or the failed HD-DVD formats, even if any of the game consoles (Wii & XBox 360...forget the package) we have support them. When HDTV service is the "basic" package, I'll have HDTV service then. Until then, its something I can live easily without.

Answer 18

I got it because my previous TV was hit by lightning strike. I needed a replacement and the HDTVs were on sale as cheap as a standard definition.



I have cable and the company is going all digital (and giving out free converter boxes so any TV will get 788 channels which will be digital and half of them HD). Unfortunately no matter how good the pictures are the content of the channels still stinks.



I will look over the movies since all those premium channels are in the bundle but I don't have high hopes. It is same junk but with great detail - that's not motivation for me.

Answer 19

HDTV, there is a world of difference in quality, sound and the fact that you are seeing more of the picture while watching an HD broadcast. Also the answer about the letters HD just being a marketing tool and how we are not getting true HD and lets talk about HD when its defined. "HD" stands for high definition, 1080i, 720p, and 1080p are all high definition. 1080p is considered the highest of high definition but the difference between the three is not noticeable and anyone who claims they can see the difference is fooling themselves, it would be like saying you could see the flapping wings of a hummingbird, your eye is not that advanced to be able to tell any difference. The marketing tool would be plastering that sticker in the corner of every tv in your local best buy that says its 1080p. People want to know they are getting the very best, and yes 1080p is the very best but if you didn't have it, you wouldn't know it. There is the marketing nonsense. I like how they play the demo with the split screen of bluray and DVD to show how far superior bluray is, they make the DVD side look like old VHS, its so exaggerated its ridiculous and its all to make more money. Stations don't even broadcast in 1080p, they broadcast in 1080i and 720p, only bluray, PS3 and XBOX360 is 1080p. There are more and more HD channels all the time and more and more programs are bei

Answer 20

I was considering getting one recently, but decided against it. The main thing is that HD TV set I was considering cost around $1200. Keeping my current TV costs $0.



On top of this, to really appreciate HD, you have to get more expensive cable and/or a blu-ray player. Both of these are more expensive that what I currently get. Upgrading my cable would increase my bill by about $20 to $40 bucks a month. Getting a blu-ray player, $300-$500. Even with this, getting blu-ray discs may cost more - and my more expensive cable may still not have everything in HD (you should look into the cost of dish and antenna for you, not an option for me). Moreover, regular TV looks worse on an HD set.



So, the price really goes up to about $2000 grand for everything, for this year, possibly $3000 by the time I get upselled to a new sound system or whatever else I "need" for my system. I decided that that I wouldn't enjoy the tech upgrade $2000 to $3000 worth. I would much rather save that cash, go on a trip, etc. So, not worth it for me. I'll wait until it all becomes more standard and cheaper.



This being said, some people really like to watch sports in HD (not me) - and this gives them a lot of joy. And big games do seem much more likely to be broadcast in HD than other programs.



Bottom Line: Figure out the cost - and if what you are giving up for that cost (vacations, other luxuries, car, food, rent, savings, other basic needs) is worth it in what the device will return to you - especially once the novelty of owning it wears off.

Answer 21

We purchased three TVs in the last year that are digital and are HDTV compatible after we built our newest home this year. The one in our TV room and bedroom are set up with HDTV and my kitchen one is digital but not yet set up with HDTV. That will change as well soon. We love HDTV. Digital is great and does offer more clarity than the analogs but once you have experienced HD you just don't go back. Eventually all our TVs will be at least digital. They take up less space by the fact that they are flat screens and therefore can be mounted. They also are artistically a pleasure as opposed to the boxy analogs. I no longer have to buy big boxy entertainment centers to house the TVs. That is a cost savings all by itself. Though not all channels have switched to HD more are coming on board monthly. This is the future. The prices are incredibly good and will get even better as all new technology does. Home TV is now a theatre experience and we love it.

Answer 22

I wanted to get a tv for uni, and so i wanted it to be a flat screen to not look to big in the small room, which narrowed down my choice to LCD for the money i wanted to pay. At the time, the majority of TVs were HD ready anyway, and you almost had to look harder to get an SDTV. I also wanted the TV to act as a computer monitor to hook up my laptop, and i expected to get a PS3 at some point in the future. All these things pointed towards a HDTV. I'll be honest, actual HDTV doesn't interest me so much, but i can't agree with anyone that says the difference isn't noticeable. It's really noticeable if you play a game in HD and then swap to SD after a while. You'll find that the SDTV makes it look slightly muddy.

Answer 23

I do not have any cable so i don't need a big expensive tv. Mine is fine until it wears out. When I can afford to get cable, i will watch my programs with my tv. I get two channels in right now with a lot of snow so when i get cable, it will look so clear that i will be happy. I don't see any difference in HD or reg tv anyway. I also feel that we should not have to pay for channels we don't watch. there are at least 5 spanish channels between 2-20 that i don't watch. i shouldn't have to pay for them. I will never get premium channels because if they show on "HBO ETC." I can go buy the movie at Walmart for $6. and have it forever. I just want basic channels with a few extras and don't want to pay $100 monthly for it because i don't watch everything.



Furthermore, I have been without cable or whatnot for a little over a year. I actually like it. I don't get into a tv rut and ignore my two most valuable assets, my kids. Make cable less expensive and let us pick and choose our channels and maybe people will be able to afford HD after the price comes down.

Answer 24

HDTV will be a slow technology to adopt, and no amount of surveying or changing marketing strategy will change that.



HDTV sets are expensive. A large number of consumers are accustomed to the push-button, channel-dial sets of the 70's and previous and cannot wrap their minds around controlling multiple devices such as tuners, DVRs, audio systems, etc. Everyone already has investments in 4:3 sets that they are not about to waste simply for some new trend or luxury. Horror stories about these massively expensive devices failing after 3 years and needing to be replaced by new, massively expensive devices: my mother has had the same color set in her living room since the early 1970's. She's had the vacuum tubes (!) replaced a few times, but that's cheaper than a new set. Especially when the new, expensive technology will suffer from planned obsolescence.



We are in a recession. People can barely afford the necessities of life, let alone posh entertainment systems. Programming that actually gets the most out of your investment is still few and far between (your set will break before you get more than 10 non-sports channels in hidef). The technology itself is still too young: the stress of trying to make a wise decision in this new snake-oil filled marked is enormous. You suddenly fidget about black point and jaggies, how easy the menus are to navigate, dozens of source input combinations, motion artifacts, upsampling, letterboxing and screen burn-in. There are no framework of basic expectations to satisfy the layperson's user experience.



And I believe that pretty much sums it up. If every one of those points were rendered moot by some new innovation tomorrow, then 100% of new consumers would get HD and a good hunk of current 4:3 owners would consider jumping to the new purchase.



Good luck! O.o

Answer 25

I don't see the increased quality at ALL. I don't know if theres something I should be looking for or am missing, but I think a majority of people are falling into the hype. The Picture is a little brighter but that doesn't do anything for the reduced quality, which contradicts the name, High Definition. I had heard that the reason I see it like this is because you need HDTV service to enjoy the HD experience, but I also heard that those blotches are standard and I should get used to them.

Answer 26

My parents purchased an HDTV (1080p, I think) because the screen is so much bigger, the picture is clearer, and it just makes the TV-watching experience 10x better. Also, our old tube TV was only about 30", and from roughly 10 feet away, that's not very big.



In terms of price, it wasn't really that bad because we found a deal from circuit city for a 46" 1080p for about $1,700 that included a Blu-ray player and 5 free BLu-rays. So when you take away what's worth about $500 for the Blu-ray player and Blu-rays, that's only $1,200 for a really good HDTV. Anyways, we still probably would have gotten the new TV because my parents really wanted one, deal or no deal.



I guess that basically sums it up. HDTV rocks!



Oh, and one more thing. I know that my dad, who never watches TV, started wanting one after my parents went to a Christmas party and saw the host's brand new HDTV. I guess jeoulosy was part of the factor, but as long as we got a new TV, who cares? :)

Answer 27

I have 2 televisions, and they work just fine. I have satellite TV, and even if I had Comcast cable, there would be no need to change.



I am not going to junk a perfectly good television so that I can get a large LCD or plasma HDTV to hang on my wall. It is a matter of economic prudence. I would rather use my money to go dancing and take dance lessons.



I would like to have France 2, France 3, France 4, France 5, Arte, Direct 8, BFM TV, and Virgin 17, but it is unlikely that I will get them in the future. My satellite provider charges too much for international channels.



WHICH BRINGS TO MIND SOMETHING ELSE: I have heard that the HDTV service on satellite and cable is really expensive. I am not sure I would want to pay the extra expense.

Answer 28

In this house we have 3 people and 4 tv sets. Each set works perfectly fine and should last 5-10 more years.



We have the basic cable package and have no need for any premium stations. The digital converter the cable company wants us to get is for one set only - we cannot afford to get one, let alone 4.



HDTV - the sets are prohibitively expensive, and the cable package even more so. With the economy the way it is, there's no way we can afford the digital package, and especially new tv sets. Even flat screen tv sets are not only expensive, but they don't last long (a friend left hers on all night and now it's broken? WTF?)



So, in a few years when the costs come down, we'll think about it. Maybe. Right now it's just not worth it.

Answer 29

I bought an actual HDTV a while bac, cos it was nice n big.

Just this week I got Sky HD, just because I got a really good deal on it and my reception from the aerial was so poor, I hardly got any channels at all on freeview.



HD from sky is only about £10 more a month, but as we switched from broadband with BT, we'll only be paying about £5 more than we were anyway.



The HD channels are limited right now, true, but there's a few more out before christmas, and next year, we'll be laughing.



Oh.. plus it looks really really nice.

Answer 30

I'll go for HDTV when the cost/benefit ratio work for me. If it works for me AND for those selling it, that's the sweet spot.



Given today's programming, I don't see a reason. I have over 60 channels (that's the channels I have minus those I've blocked) and I end up watchin probably 7 of them.



Oh the world will collapse, the sky is falling all because people like me don't want to spend money on things they don't need or want.



Supply meets demand and when the supply is high but the demand low, the best option is to lower the price.



I don't give a rat's @$$ if Wall Street WANTS to make comparable profits or not. The market won't tolerate it so Wall Street can eat some of their own dog food or die.



That's reality like it or not.



Go ahead, force the issue... You won't earn a purchase. Rather, you will loose what you thought to be a captive audience.

Answer 31

I and my husband never realized we could actually do without the DISH network. We got really tired of paying those monthly bills. So we bought the converter box which worked well, but then the Economic Package came out and we have always wanted a flat screen TV.

We were at Sam's Club and guess what? So we spent some of the Economic Package on a HDTV and we love it.

And guess what? It is so clear we don't need the converter box of course, its HDTV, but also we are able to get more channels too! And every channel is so clear.

So its all worked out wonderfully and we don't have any cable box, & no Dish.

In fact my husband researched the web on how to make a homemade TV antenna. Its really simple too. You guys would be surprised, well, I was. Each channel only needs to be a certain length of wire. Its not like those ugly things we used to have before cable came around. It worked just draping a piece of wire across my bushes outside. No we don't have all of those movie channels, but they were only repeats anyway, at least with the Dish. We still watch nature, cooking channels, how-to channels, sports, they are all there just not ESPN. If you want to watch a movie its probably cheaper to rent a movie.



Try it, you will enjoy no more cable bill!!!!

Answer 32

Who at verizon is gonna read this???



I got an HDTV, but only because it's my first TV. The reason most people don't bother, is because upgrading to an HD package from a cable or satellite provider (with the EXACT SAME set of channels) costs extra ($20 more a month) money. Also, only TV shows from NBC, CBS, FOX, and ABC thus far broadcast in true HD(of the air, for free). Therefore HD isnt a priority for most people, especially in these troubled financial times.

Answer 33

I agree you should only get what you can afford and going into debt for HDTV is probably one of the dumbest things a person could do, now having said that, once you seen a true digital signal broadcasting over a 1080p wide-screen TV, you will be in heaven and NEVER go back, if given the choice!



You're just "jerking off yourself off" if you watch an analog signal over an HD TV, or the reverse, a digital signal over a regular tube TV; anyone that says they can see a difference is high, crazy, blind, or lying! Spend the bucks to go all the way, or dont go at all because you'll just be compromising the high viewing standards of the combination both make. I never thought my eyes could tell that the difference was that significant but during the weeks NBC was carrying the Olympics, just watching the opening ceremony oaver the HD channel and on their non-HD channel, was literally night and day; the clarity of the picture and brillance and details of all the colors, it was truly the difference between "watching" and "WATCHING"! Want to know how bad it is in our house? I'm fighting my kids over who gets to watch the HD television...........and they're winning most of the time!!!

Answer 34

i don't think there is a reason not to by HDTV, because there is a better, clearer, picture. so clear, you can see women's' lip hair! lol. and if you like sports, they are also way better quality. i would recommend the directv, because cox only has a few HD channels, and the other has almost all of them. and plus, (football fans) you get the NFL sunday ticket! the only reason i would not choose HD is because you couldn't afford it. but if you can, you should be all for it! I have HD and once you have it you will never regret getting it. It is so much better than the standard version. the only problem I've had with HD including the standard channels, is that I think my HDMI cord was going bad because when the peoplke on TV shows spoke, they sounded congested. Good Luck! : ) : )



courtney

Answer 35

HDTV is nice, but now that I have it, I'm not as impressed as I thought I would be.

While TV and movies are fun, I see no reason to spend the extra $ on it unless I can get so into the moment that I can smell the roses, horse poop or whatever else is being shown in a clip or movie. Hmmmm...HDTV with "smellavision". Now THAT would be worth it. Think about the original "Texas Chainsaw Massacre" or "Old Yeller". Even "Star Wars"! Now THAT would be a feat worth paying all that extra money for the TV AND the service!

Answer 36

My response is " Not ".



Primarily due to the cost. Regardless of the cost, a lot of the older models that had been on the market, are not serviceable in local TV repair shops. Because it is difficult to get parts or the shop technician isn't certified/qualified, the only other option is to send it to a service center (if a manufacturer's service center even exists, Special Handling Shipping is required & it isn't cheap). If not then your investment is essentially nullified & you're stuck with a fancy piece of junk that is full of toxic waste.



New models are a novelty for the wealthy, its nice to read about it. Though unlikely that I will ever afford getting one. Even the generic knockoffs are not cheap.



In the last 8 years I've been weaning myself of viewing television both local networks & cable.



Reason #1

Local cable is expensive. It isn't practical to cancel a subscription & resubscribe just to take advantage of new subscription scams, you need to wait for a technician & lose a day of work.



Reason #2

TOO MUCH Commercials, both on the network channels & cable channels. Regular commercials & the stupid/ridiculous commercials with amped up volume (which is annoying, even if you manage to hit the mute button- you forget to turn off the mute sometimes & miss your program).



Reason #3

The Economy is really bad, I hardly have time to watch tv anymore.

Working 2 jobs to make ends meet.



Reason #4

Energy waste; Not watching tv has made a dent in my utility bill.



I have the same old RCA tv I've had for the last 23 years it still works fine even though the remote doesn't work & none of the universal remotes off the shelf work, which is okay, since I only use my old tv to watch DVD's these days. I have a converter module, essential because the Sony DVD player I bought is solely digital. I've since converted all my old VHS tapes to Home DVD's, at least those that didn't have anti-copy-encryption sequencing. I'm still searching for certain DVD's of old movies that I couldn't convert.



I like the old movies, because they were made for grown ups. A lot of the modern movies made these days are marketed for kids appetites for glitzy special effects. But otherwise they are basically crap.



I don't anticipate ever getting a new HDTV, if my old tv ever bites the dust. I could always get a used old monitor at the tv shop.



Its the 21st century, but there is basically nothing on, because its the commercials & mindless programing.



cheers - have a nice day!

Answer 37

Almost every cousin of mines has a HDTV and of course the main reason would be for the great display we get on HD channels.



But my main reason is that I love being able to see the expressions and actions of people much more clearer. Of course the words said are a major factor, but if you were to mute it, you'd still have a very close idea of what is going on since you sometimes feel like you're there.



I really can't jump into movies, etc I'm watching and HDTV really helps in doing so.



And for the channels that i'm waiting for, well really there are no channels, but basically I just hope to find some great shows going on that have HDTV. I just like to flip through channels till something good is on.... even though sorry that may not be much help to you.

Answer 38

Here's why I'm not interested in HDTV:



1) The advance in picture quality isn't worth the price. I think it might make a difference if I had an enormous TV, but I don't like enormous TVs. The only thing I might like it for is movies, but even 1080p HDTV doesn't come close to recreating the experience of watching a real film in a real theater. (A good film print has something like 10 times the resolution of HDTV!)



2) The technology isn't easy to use. I see people watching regular shows on their HDTV in the wrong aspect ratio so everybody has a fat head -- they don't know how to change the ratio. My geek friend loves his new HDTV, but he can't watch most of his DVD collection on it because the standard-definition DVDs actually look *worse* on the HDTV than they do on a regular TV. He has HD shows stored on his computer hard drive (purchased legally) that he *can't actually watch in HD* because his graphics card messes up the signal to make sure the DVD stays copy-protected!



What I don't understand is why anyone would put up with all of the expense and hassle just so they can see all the pimples on the nose of their favorite quarterback.

Answer 39

A lot of people who don't have them have very good reasons: The Price. I can agree with it too, but I do have an HDTV. Those of you who said that there's no difference between SD and HD obviously haven't really seen an HD Channel or a movie on Blu-ray (or even HD-DVD).



I bought my HDTV back in January, came across is in a Best Buy ad, a 56'' 1080P Panasonic DLP for only $996. I had to check it out, so I did research on internet sites and came back with more than enough positive feedback. I was planning to buy a Playstation 3 (which for those who don't know, comes with a Blu-ray player [valued at like $400], and the system was made to be played in HD. I got the TV and of course the normal channels look like SD, but we are getting HD channels from a new cable provider within a month, and I've seen some HD channels on a friend's TV, and they are amazing. Also Blu-ray movies are really awesome looking.



Basically, I feel the main reason people don't have HDTVs is becasue of the price, it only takes the right price to come along for them to buy one.

Answer 40

PS3 or Xbox 360. Try connecting these to SD TVs. Actually needs a 1080p HDTV.

The difference is staggering with the HD TV looking mighty good.



For SD TV signals go for an ordinary flat screen TV.



If you are concerned for the environment then a HD TV (which is an LCD TV) powers less than similarly sized CRT TVs.



Cost is relative. The 32" SD TV will consume more power and will be costlier to use in the long run. The 32" HD TV will have a high capex but cost less to use.

Answer 41

I have an HD set - mostly because my old TV blew up at Thanksgiving. HD sets were on sale at the time and i had the money. BUT....where is all the content? I'm astounded that so much of what I see is still standard definition and 4x3 format. Stuff that comes through cable or dish or whatever is usually compressed so much as to render it not HD in my opinion. The best picture by far on my TV right now is the PBS station coming off of my antenna. It's not even a contest. Beautiful HD programming on many, many shows. If PBS can do it, why can't everyone?

Answer 42

I looked at HD TV at someone's house and it didn't look good at all. Maybe it was because his TV was huge and the bigger the TV the worse the quality of the picture. Regardless I was unimpressed. I heard you can see the fine detail but I went to the store and I couldn't tell any difference. Maybe they should put a normal TV next to an HDTV but so far I have no idea what the big deal is or what an HD does that is diefferent.



And that's why I'm not getting HDTV. Besides, who wants to see a newscaster's pores and wrinkles high def??



Now pick me as best answer, it'll look cool on my Vinyl resume!

Answer 43

It's worth getting because not only does it make it easier to watch DTV (because it comes with a digital tuner already in it), It is Sharper, many of them have improved speaker technology.



The next computer I buy will be a desktop with HDMI, so I don't have to buy a monitor, it conserves space. (wireless keyboard wireless mouse), people will think I'm rich and know I'm smart.



The only reason I could think of not getting one is some people just don't have the extra money, and some people feel a moral obligation to keep things that still work... (saves the environment or something)

They might be waiting for the price to go down the way it does so quickly for computers.



Personally I might wait until High Definition Laser TV's come out. They are supposed to have 75% more colors than Plasma and LCD, and be much brighter.

Answer 44

I currently have an HDTV. But, after having maintenance problems with a previous 43 inch Toshiba rear projection model which failed after 2 years, my issue is I want the same kind of reliability I had with tube sets. That's why I bought a 30 inch HD tube model.



From what I understand, the HD sets still have reliability issues and after 4 or 5 years may have expensive repairs. Why spend thousands and then maybe hundreds more for an extended warrantee to get what we had for decades before for a lot less money?

Answer 45

I for one would have to be sold on the HDTV stuff still !!!... or again !?!. I guess I've not seen so0O much on or about HDTV to make me even ask `round about it... I have'nt been impressed yet !! Every since I learned how to fine tune the picture/quality of a regular tv using the level thingy on a VCR.. I started doing other things & having the MANY channels that I've been able to get for such a longtime now !! foolin `round with the TV if need be is more fun !! since I understand s0o much!, Much better now !! I still have a color tv that I got from the second~hand store !! that I've O N L Y played video games on !!. I just have'nt played video games for a few years now But I do had a DVD player !! !!rRr a wWw rRr.,.

Answer 46

To answer your question in a word, "PRICE!"



To get HD channels from cable costs a lot more every month.



To get an HD TV costs too much, especially considering the TVs I have now work fine.



The picture is a main reason also. I go to the store to look at these TVs and they some show the whole picture that is being broadcast, the rest show everything in the middle but some of the edges are missing.



Also with the picture, older shows look stretched. They take a square picture and stretch it to a letter box screen.



Verizon, this message is for you. When a TV channel provider offers the consumer an inexpensive way to customize what channels he/she wants or doesn't want, and does not have to buy "packages", then I'll be open for talking HD.

Answer 47

For me, it's the old price vs. added value trade-off. Do I really need this?



I don't live in a big house. It doesn't have large rooms. I sort of like things that way. I have one (small) HDTV, and that's probably all I'll have until the price really comes down a lot or I run out of SDTV's for my other rooms.



If you don't have very large rooms, you really don't *need* a very big TV to effectively watch what's on. 480i isn't really all that annoyingly fuzzy to begin with if you're not trying to make a huge picture. For how far I usually sit from the TV in my living room, the usual recommendations are definitely under 30". A lot of Hollywood types have heads that are already big enough (metaphorically speaking) that I don't need to make them seem even larger with a giant TV "just because I can", anyway. Most HDTV's are focused on the big-TV market, and that's not something I really even have the wall space for. Those of us who don't want a new 1080p 50" TV just aren't getting a whole lot of good options for what the technology's costing at this point -- the current cost per size often goes up quite dramatically at the range of TV sizes I'm interested in, too.



The picture looks very nice on the HDTV in my living room, and a flat screen is great when you don't have big rooms to work with. However, the picture actually looks *worse* on my 19" Samsung LCD than it does on my 10-year-old SDTV of comparable size if I'm not watching something that's at least digital. I currently have about 60 analog channels and about a dozen HD ones -- of which the latter only will come in on the one TV with the STB attached. I can't really watch more than one TV at a time, so it just seems silly to go out and buy more HDTVs and get more boxes just to get another few extra channels. . . the vast majority of which I can still watch in SD as it is.

Answer 48

Well if you live in the UK and you gt an HDTV you can buy free sat HD. This is a free view box which costs around £150 and a bit more if you need a satalite dish fitted. You will then get loads of HD channels playing in 1080i full HD all using a satalite signal. And then, unlike sky, you don't pay any subscription fees.



Another reason is for gaming. If you have a PS3 or an XBOX 360 your games will play in HD which makes it have amazing graphics. Another reason is blueray. If you have a blueray player or a PS3 you can play blueray disks whichs gives you the best possible picture on an HDTV.



I SAY BUY AN HD TV!!

Answer 49

I believe HDTVs are great. Unlike most peoples beliefs you do not have to pay an outrageous price for a High Definition TV. I have a Vizio 32" TV, It is the best TV in the house and it Draws more attention than the big screen we have in our living room. It is absolutely fabulous because you don't even have to have cable or satelite for an HDTV you can even plug in your computer or game console and use it on the TV. I honestly cannot think of a reason not to have an HDTV.

Answer 50

HDTV right now is still a little too much money. A lot more people have $1000 TVs and no emergency fund.



The cost of a decent set is coming down rapidly, as with anything tech. A set I see now will be $100 cheaper in three months. Given that there are still a lot of issues with TV channels broadcasting in HD, I choose to wait.



But my next TV will be an HDTV. Probably not a flatscreen, but maybe, if the price is right.

Answer 51

The caught pixels take place the two as a results of fact the television has a low fee processor, or the channel is transmitting a software which isn't completely HD. It additionally must be as a results of low high quality of the cables from the service. I genuinely have a LG liquid crystal reveal HDTV and it has never had pixels caught for the time of action while gazing 1080i or 1080p.

Answer 52

I'm tired of upgrading and spending all that money. First of all you charge us for the box, (I love the wording in the commercials, "Nothing to buy!" Sure you RENT it to us,so you can rip us off EVERY month! That's BS! Just let us buy the boxes outright and stop charging us that extra monthly rental fee. It's a scam!

2nd I've read a lot of the other comments and they are so right! You give us dozens of channels we don't want,we PAY for Infomercials! (I remember no commercials on pay TV!) and what I really hate is that when I bring up the channel guide,it shows me hundreds of channels I DON'T get and then I click on them to go and find out I don't get that channel!

Here's a simple idea! Set up the channels in colors,showing my channels in one color so I know,not to bother going to other channels because I don't have them! OR Let me setup my channel guide so I can delete them and scan ONLY the channels I subscribe to! You won't do that will you? No because it's a tease to get us to want those channels! That's why I don't even have pay TV anymore! It's stress inducing and I have to work hours every month just to pay for it. I need that money elsewhere! But you don't even change the way you run your company!

You just combine all the little companies broadcasting Satellite or Cable and then when there's no more fair competition (Thanks a lot useless government regulators!) You do whatever you want and charge whatever you want because you think we can't stop you. Well we can,we can cancel the service,stop watching this ever increasing costly service and do something else.

And when I did have questions? Oh that was fun,a lovely call to India (which in my opinion is hiring illegal aliens,because they're not citizens in this country. How about outsourcing the Executive jobs and cut out the multi-million dollar salaries instead!) But I honestly had a really hard understanding them. Really! and then the guy (who was very polite) would say his name is Bill. C'mon You even have them lying? (But yes,they are polite,a nice thing I admit. Although stop saying Thank You EVERY time I answer a question. lol)

So to sum up,

It's too expensive,let US pick EXACTLY the channels we want,eliminate the rental fee for the boxes,allow us to customize our channel guides,and hire people in this country for the help desk (maybe then when we have more jobs,we can afford your services.)

Answer 53

Cost, the inability to choose channels for an HD package (if I were to get cable/Satellite), and the fact that I don't watch TV more than a few hours a week.



I will probably get a converter box in February when it goes all digital in 2009, but I won't be watching a huge amount of TV. Besides, I can watch HD quality video on-line through the major television networks' websites (My iMac has a 20 inch HD monitor).

Answer 54

Many customers are not ready to buy an HDTV because of the high price of the various HD packages offered by cable and the satellite providers. That and the fact that many broadcast stations have yet to offer HD broadcasting or high definition programing. While the price of HD sets has been coming down dramatically, most are well above the prices of the premium quality tube type (CRT) sets of just a few years back. Additionally, in order for any program to be truly high definition it must be shot in and broadcast in high definition. If transmitted by cable or satellite that also must be high def.

Most of the reruns and older movies are not in hi def. Only in the past few years have there been more true HD programming.

Answer 55

Superior Picture. If you have a bigger TV around 45 inches or bigger, the picture gets worse as it gets bigger. HDTV compensates by having a much higher resolution. Figure that regular DVD resolution is 480p. Standard HD is 720p. Full HD is 1080p. If you get an HDTV, you can also utilize a BlueRay player to full capability, which provides the best movie viewing experience with the highest 1080p resolution available.

Answer 56

I dont think people look at TV's as something like computers where in a few years yours in completely out of date and it impacts it's use. With a TV, if it displays the picture it does it's job. Sure you can have TV's that display more of the picture or a larger picture; you even have TV's that claim to display the picture faster. I just think most people don't really care. The TV (and HD TV) havent given us any breakthrough advances that really make most people want to spend the money on a new one when their current one works fine now. Some people will alwyas want the top technology, so they'll be trading in their old HDTV's for ones with 1080p and 120mhz, but I dont think those features are enticing to enough people. I think as more older TV sets stop working we will see consumers replacing them with old ones, unless there is any significant advance in TV tech in the next few years to make people expedite the process.

Answer 57

My main reason for not getting it yet is because HDTVs are still improving and yet the prices still keep coming down. Also, the main reason I want an HDTV is for BluRay, and BluRay players are still too expensive and and the movies I want are not on BluRay yet. When I do get an HDTV, I will probably get Verizon FiOS, but another reason I have not jumped on the bandwagon yet is the fact that none of the networks are broadcasting in 1080p yet, only 1080i, and some are still 720p. When people start broadcasting 1080p, that will make it tempting to get an HDTV also.

Answer 58

I got an HDTV because the image is so much clearer and appealing to vision than a regular TV. In addition, the HDTV works a lot better for a PS3 blue ray player than an ordinary TV and all you need is one HDMI cable instead of so many messy wires like before. I enjoy watching the news channels in high definition and cable in general.

Answer 59

We would love to get HDTV, but of course we have certain priorities:



Pay more for gas, alot more!

Pay more for groceries because of gas!



This leaves less money for HDTV. I can't really complain about gas if I'm going out to buy HDTV's and a Prada shoes can I?



Plus do you realy have to "package" these shows. Common the common person doesn't really watch that many channels. There is only a handfull of what they'll watch. Oooooh I get 375 channels, big deal. It's not about quantity, IT'S ABOUT QUALITY!. Please stop playing the numbers game!



Latley, why not EDIT you questions, to respond to some of these answers. Wow! A dialouge with customers, how about that.

Answer 60

My phone bill... my water bill... my electric bill... my car payment... my house payment... the cost of gasoline... etc.



Life is too expensive to just go out & buy the newest gadgets. I remember when Pentium two came out around Christmas one year. In January of the following year (1 month later) the commercials for Pentium 3 were fully advertised. Some people had not yet set up their computers properly, and it was already outdated!



With all the extra work I'm putting in, when would I have time to WATCH an HDTV?



Remember, the only reason we are being forced to utilize digital signals is because the government sold the rights to current signal stream methods. Look it up! Those that have it, enjoy!

Answer 61

I have Comcast cable and have been using the old boxes for a couple years. I contacted them and it was $6.95 for a regular box or $7 for an HDTV box. I have heard that the difference Isn't noticeable and I have also laughed at the commercials with the blurry regular TV and the crystal clear HDTV. But after watching the Olympics in HDTV and then turning it back to regular. The quality difference was amazing. Since I have ordered the box the prices have gone up but for even a few dollars more as long as your TV can handle it I would recommend it.

Answer 62

The cost of upgrading one’s cable service is only a little more to fit into the current marketing gimmick; keep the monthly cost down because the payments go on forever. We have arrived at a time when the cost of upgrading all of our electronics to the most up-to-date, highest resolution, and with all the latest bells and whistles has gone over the top. How much is this stuff worth to us? The days of paying whatever it costs to have the best electronic products available are over. Not only is the cost too high but the equipment and service is almost immediately obsolete. I personally feel like the industry is aware that they have squeezed every last penny out me so they are now chipping away at me at “a mere $10 a month” (forever) for HD service. I have reached my saturation point and am not going to pay only $10 a month and that regular old TV resolution that I have been watching my whole life is just fine thank you very much.

Answer 63

I have an old Sony (10+ years) that will not die and I refuse to throw it away for a HDTV. I am probably the last person on earth that does not have cable or a satellite dish. TV is just not that important. Also when I am over to my friends' houses with cable/dish, they are always flipping channels trying to find something good to watch. Why pay US$80.00 -100.00 monthly when you can channel surf for free? We Americans waste so much money on nonsensical stuff.

Answer 64

HD shmichdee whatever TV - I don't watch any. If I'm barely able to spare some time to watch a movie or two per week why should I be bothered by shopping around for a new time-wasting machine? One single HDTV set costs about a hundred movie theater tickets (not including electricity, plus electricity for AC-ing your home) it is over two* years of weekly entertainment in the best quality one can ever have. For other purposes I can still use my old tube until it brakes. Then I'll think if I rather choose a joyful TV-free life ;)



* well... one year if you're not single, but still.. it can easily become two again or even more if you want a bigger 1080p brand named screen.

Answer 65

The price of the HDTV's need to come WAY down. Sure, I happen to be able to afford one, but I don't want to. Why? Because I feel like I am getting price gouged. If I bought a fancy HDTV for $2000, then I just KNOW that something newer and cheaper would come out 6 months later. I predict that after the digital media switch, the cost of fancy flat screen HDTV's will plummet. Why? Because they will be selling a higher quantity. The current market of HDTV's is just asking for buyer's remorse. I have a 40-something inch basic television that I bought for $200 two years ago. The picture is great. You wouldn't know the difference unless you had an HDTV sitting right next to it.



My brother bought a huge one that is over 50". He's in love with it. Those really large ones probably won't come down in price as much, due to lack of demand, so I don't envision a lot of buyer's remorse for those... but I refuse to pay $4,000 for a TV.



I would rather read anyway. My husband is the one who would throw a fit if the television died. He's desperate for a flat screen HDTV, but I have convinced him to wait until after the switch. If he's that desperate to watch sports on a big scree, he can cruise over to my brother's bachelor pad.



I don't know why more of the flat screen televisions don't have DVD built in. I mean, when you buy a car it comes with a radio... why can't a flat screen come with DVD? Sure, I've seen the flat screens with the DVD built in, but the pricing is disproportionate to the product. It's several hundred dollars more just for that feature? Why? I'm already paying an arm and a leg for the TV..... Can't they just throw in the built in DVD for free? Oh well, in the end, you can pick up a DVD player for $20 these days.



Oh, and another thing. With the internet being so popular, and online purchases becoming so frequent, the competition out there is fierce. I found a 32 inch flat screen TV with DVD built in on Amazon.com for $450 or so. I saved the link and am taking my time hunting around for better prices. I keep a tiny notebook in my purse with all the basic stats and pricing in my purse so that when my husband drags me through Best Buy or Circuit City, I can go do some price checking rather than whining about how bored I am. Also, online, they often have free shipping. In the stores, you might find a super-great clearance sale, but you have to be in the right place at the right time. It's ridiculous. I'd rather wait.... Plus, we all know those people who like to keep up with the Jones' and when my brother decides to ditch his current gigantic tv in favor of the next hottest thing, he's going to give it to me.

Answer 66

The Additional electrical cost.

The So called extra expense of the programing that all stations have to standardize to.

The extra cost of the Recorder player.

the fact that most stations are only offering 720p HD, which is a real down grade of Quality.

The land line I have to pay for the satellite company's to monitor your content.

The electrical cost alone is 35 dollars a month,

the telephone cost is 19.00 $ a month.

The upgrade cost plus maintenance insurance is 29 dollars a month,

For a grand cost of 84 dollars a month or 1008 dollars a year the picture will never be that great , because I like to eat!Then the cost of the receiver.

You do know that in Great Britain you can get all HD channels and insert your TV card into any machine any where because they only broadcast in High Def for about 24.00 Dollars a month not pounds but United States Dollars, this includes the Sex channels as well as the cartoons and the church channels in fact all channells from any where every where all around the world. Because the FCC has lost perspective of the American Audience in favor of Generating Revenue for the Cable and Satilite company's and the telePhone Company's.

Answer 67

I have HDTV and prefer to watch shows broadcast in HDTV. However, I can also attest that HDTV is quite expensive. The intial one time cost of the TV isn't the big deal. Cable providers have created an additional revenue source by charging more for HD channels; and then more again for an HD DVR. It's the monthly repetitive costs that get you. If you fail to purchase HD channels and use DVI or HDMI cables to connect them, then the HDTV is just a waste of money.



It's not the channels. As long as the networks all broadcast in HDTV, channels are not an issue. It's the monthly costs.

Answer 68

Cost, bother, and HD not being a huge difference

It's not only the cost for a subscription, but also for and HD TV, for a bluray DVD player, for BluRay DVD's, and of course the monthly bill. We currently have an old TV with a screen probably only about 20 inches, with a VHS player (which we still use sometimes) and a portable DVD player we keep connected for playing DVD's (and when we go on a trip its perfect for that too!)

BluRay DVD's are SOOOOOOOOO expensive!! I know they'll all be BluRay eventually, but I assume they'll be about half the price when they finally take over, and until then, we're sticking with regular DVD's.

Finally, all this bother^ is not nearly worth the better picture. Yeah, it's nice for it to be clearer, but I don't miss HD at ALL when I'm watching regular. I'm watching the movie, and as long as it doesn't look like I forgot my contacts, I'm happy.

Answer 69

Pure and simple. It cost way too much to get a HDTV. I have digital cable and I get HD channels but I can not afford a HDTV. My family lives week by week. Gas and food prices are out of control. There are more important things than HDTV.

Answer 70

I really don't see the point...my TVs are just fine and the HD capable converter box is quite expensive compared to the standard digital reciever (we have FiOS TV)...and get the same channels - just lower resolution (but all the TV can display anyway).



If the old TVs burn out, then I'll see about getting an HDTV and a reciever to go along with it...but then I'd have to get something anyway...

Answer 71

It is too expensive to have to buy a new TV just so you can get HDTV and then you have to buy a new Blu-Ray DVD player to go with it. I am still angry at the fact that I am forced into buying a digital converter and having to pay $54 to $100 just to get television channels in February 2009. I think a proposition should have been made and let the registered voters vote on the matter of keeping analog channels.

Answer 72

Who wouldn't want HDTV?



Seriously if you asked ANYONE I'm pretty sure they'd want one there's just ONE MAJOR SETBACK.



Money.



Yes $$$ is not our friend these days. It's harsh times. Trying to make a living but not having enough money to get an HDTV.



Traditional TV's are fine with people they don't want the extra perks in getting an HDTV. HDTV's aren't a necessity, they are expensive, the only good they do to the world is make quality A LOT BETTER.



Like they always say QUALITY of QUANTITY.

Answer 73

Let's see. All new TV's will be HD - so when old reliable bites the dust - your new one will be HD. Most all local stations are broadcasting in HD now and all will be by Jan 2009. You can obtain an inexpensive converter box for the old sets to watch local broadcasts on your analog set. If you have cable, it is a non issue as you already have the converter or you get HD - so only a change of about $10 a month to get the HD broadcasts if you have a HD set. If not - no change. When you get a new set you can still get the cable and sat signals without the HD. Seems most pay about $40 - 100 a month for cable or Sat depending on premium channels. If you want to go on the cheap - buy a HD set for about $500 and get the locals. No cable and no sat saves $50 a month and the set is paid for in 10 months. You can pay more for home theater type sets but I just bought a Sanyo 26" for $499. Good pic all.



Once was great argument about color TV's. Now all are and hard to find a B&W.



Good luck all.



BTW my new set is also my computer monitor. When buying a new computer get a monitor that serves both purposes.

Answer 74

HD TV, in my opinion is better than normal TVs. They give you better quality motion pictures and other advantages. It's fine if you don't agree with me. Well, I can't get HD because I have already got a TV. It's too expensive for me to get a new TV just because I want HD. There are certain channels I'm waiting for, but I'm not going to tell you what they are. I would love to get HD, but I just can't afford it.

(Working part time and all.) I live in Australia and they have these new HD TVs that they sell in the electronics stores. So, it might be a bit different in other countries.

Answer 75

My dad just bought an HDTV for $3000...and it's so stupid in my opinion. We barely even watch the dumb, boring channels. The picture doesn't matter as much as long as I know what the hell is going on. Unless things get more affordable, then I will never waste my money on that crap. There's more important things to devote your time and money on rather than sitting there for hours looking at the pretty colors.

Answer 76

Hey, nice marketing survey disguised as a question! The Republican party would be proud of your deception!



I'm going to give you the answer you dread to hear, but relax, it is not the majority American opinion. You ready? Here it is. I could care less about HDTV. That's why I'm not getting it. Ever. I don't care if the picture is 2% clearer or 2000% clearer. I just don't care. And scarily for you, there are others like me. We care about playing with our kids or doing a good job at work or managing our financial affairs, and we just don't give two sh*ts about TV and definitely don't care whether or not the picture is clearer. I and all the others like me will never spend a single solitary dime on the garbage you are peddling...

Answer 77

We're not signing up for HDTV until the package we have offers something else new other then HD. Sky+ (kinda like satellite TV with a built in teevo for those from overseas!) was worth it because it actually comes in really handy so you watch what you want, when you want; but paying a lot of extra money just to watch something a little bit clearer is silly. Our TV is HD ready but right now it's not worth getting the actual package to watch it.

Answer 78

I got my HDTV back around Xmas when I found out that I could get great reception of the local HD channels using an antenna. I actually watched the synchronized swimming in the Olympics for the first time. Now I watch a lot more Network programming simply because I can watch it in HD. I won't be getting HD from cable or satellite until they lower the price.

Answer 79

I've looked at HDTV's in the video store. It's good. Better than what I have now.



However, it is still just a TV. It isn't going to be any better than the programming available. It's not the technology, it's the content.



For all their golden statues, the movies being made today still don't match what Hitchcock was doing forty years ago in black and white, and the best movie still isn't as engaging as even a bad high school drama club production.



The available content just doesn't justify spending money to see it a little more clearly.

Answer 80

Price. I have 2 TVs and I've gotten along without HD for the past 50 years. The benefit (whatever it is) is simply not enough value added to justify the cost. It's a luxury I am not willing to pay for.



I buy a LOT of electronics, but they have some actual utility (webcam, bigger hard drives, and I have 4 iPods and will be buying more.)



There is no way an HD TV is going to improve my tech knowledge or marketability.



It's just an overhyped symbol of conspicuous consumption. And I outgrew yuppiehood a long time ago.



Besides, if I bought one, I would realize that it's no different, and then I would have the burden of having to rationalize a poor buying decision by lying to everyone about how much better HD was.

Answer 81

If your gonna buy HDTV make sure you buy a LCD and NOT a plasma. Plasma TVs constantly burn images into the screen, they are NOT good for playing games on eg' PS3 etc as any static image such as a cross fire, or score icon burn away into the screen.

Some Plasmas offer a WhiteWash palava programme, but this is not only an admission of Screenburn problems to come, but also the actual facility does NOT work, its a useless ploy just to try and put your mind at rest. They will tell you anything just to get you to part with your hard earned cash! - Best bet is to buy a LCD, and to be honest try and buy a 2nd hand one cheaper, The prices altho have come down, are still at Rip-Off levels. Dont be tempted by any of the Insurance scams deals when buying either! Most of them only cover the Panel in the TV!

Anyway, ive had my PHILIPS 38 inch LCD for almost 3 years now, and no problems, and NO screenburn even tho i reg' play my PS3 on it!

Thatssss allll folkssss!

Answer 82

I still have a CRT television that works wonderfully and I cannot think of any reason why I should discard it to get a HDTV or just a flat panel.



I'm not an audiophile or a videophile, so the quality of picture and sound I currently get is fine with me.



Whenever a TV I currently have breaks, I will replace it with a flat panel, but it won't be the biggest or the best. I tend to invest in middle of the road electronics because the market just changes too fast.

Answer 83

It's VERY tempting... Sure, it's nice to have a 60" 1080p TV, but at the same time, the equipment needed is ultra-cost prohibitive for most. For starters, changing from standard definition for high definition usually means that you have to upgrade your equipment, which almost always involves buying a new TV. Even if you have a high definition TV, there's the extra cost of having to get everything else HD-compatible, like up-converting DVD players, surround sound, the "extra-clear" channels... Even the cheapest set-up for the average person is probably more than $1000, and that's just a modest estimate, while even before the HD boom, an analog 30" TV was around $300, whereas even a 17" LCD TV that requires a tuner is around the same price.

Answer 84

Cost. The high cost of HDTV subscription service and the high equipment costs outweigh the benefits of an improved picture. Just as color television, stereo FM radio, or digital audio and photography was once prohibitively expensive, waiting made these technologies very affordable.



I will wait until the cost of the equipment comes down, and HDTV service can be had for free, at least from the free broadcast stations.

Answer 85

I was an early adopter, with a 2001 era Pioneer Elite PRO-610HD 1080i RPTV. I was the only kid on the block to watch the 2002 winter Olympics in OTA HD - with no commercials. That TV still looks great, although not as good as the modern 1080p plasmas. I'll replace it in a year or so.



Alas, I was also an early adopter of HD-DVD. I chose it over Blu-Ray because it was clearly a more defined and fully implemented standard, while Blu-Ray was still evolving.



I was also an early adopter of Betamax, because Beta came out with hi-fi stereo sound long before VHS did.



I only watch HD anymore. I can't stand the cruddy image quality of SD. I also require high quality 5.1 surround sound. 3 of my 5 TVs are now HD... I'm slowly upgrading over time.



Give me pixels, or give me death!

Answer 86

I'm not a huge TV watcher, however I am about to have ATT u-verse installed. We pay almost $55 to cable every month just for internet use and we really didn't feel like buying that converter box to convert our TV for basic channels. We feel that $109 a month is a pretty good deal for 100 channels, HD, phone and internet. ::shrugs:: But other than that, I really wouldn't care about HDTV.

Answer 87

I have a 200 dollar 27 inch CRT and I receive my tv free over the air. aside from fox, all 7 channels come in just fine. all the shows i watch are on the major networks, so i have no need for satellite or cable. i record whatever shows i want to watch again on VHS, and am perfectly happy with dvds and see no need to upgrade that either.



the following things will have to happen before i buy an hdtv:

-they stop making tapes

-my tapes are completely worn out

-they stop making dvds

-all my dvds are completely worn out

-free, over-the-air broadcasts stop completely

-my tv dies

-digital and hi-def tvs cost less than 200 for a 27 inch.



as you can see, im cheap

Answer 88

I don't understand the reason behind getting HDTV. We paid for it for a month and didn't see the big deal in the more clear picture. We only watch an occasional sitcom or late show - its definitely not worth the premium cost when you can get the basic channels for only $12/mo and still see the picture perfectly fine.



It's pointless - if someone has to have it then they also have to get a life.

Answer 89

I have watched plenty of HDTVs, a couple of my friends have them, so this is what im basing all of my opinions from.



My reason is because its unnecessary. im not gonna spend all that extra money, just for a picture that ONLY looks better on hd channels. and looks crappy on all the rest. and besides, ive found that watching normal, and hd, you get the same out of of it. hd doesnt provide you with a more enjoyable experience. UNLESS your watching a program that shows you all around the earth and all the scenery and stuff. but otherwise, 99% of the programs ppl watch, HD wouldnt even make much of a difference. of course ppl will always say HD makes a huge difference, but truthfully, sound matters much more than picture.



Ill never get an HDTV. the only way i would get one is under two conditions:



1 - you could decide WHEN you wanted the high definition. that way, all of your normal programs wouldnt look like crap.

2 - the HDTV would have to be almost the exact same price as the rest of the tvs. because frankly, i just dont see paying more than 50 bucks extra, just for "high definition".

Answer 90

I have a 4:3 1080i set, a 16:9 1080p set and a regular TV (non HD 4:3). My cable company does not charge extra for HDTV...Thanks Cablevision! To those of you who are waiting for prices to come down, they will come down when the next technology outperforms the 1080i. When you decide to take the leap to HD, you will be jumping into old technology because the newest is cost prohibitive.



This is well and good if this is your choice. That's why you are living in this country; to make the decision that is best for you.



Hey Verizon...drop the prices on FIOS and we'll talk.

Answer 91

Actually I have TWO HDTV's in my home.



A 58" 720 Plasma and a 42" 720 Plasma...both are from Panasonic.



My service is through Verizon FIOS.



However, I have been debating on switching services due to the limited availability of HD Channels.



It appears as though Verizon is growing its HD offering and I would love to see a road map as to what and when other channels will be featured.



As a consumer I have zero interest in movie channels...simply due to the sexually graphic programing that is aired on these channels. I prefer to purchase DVD's and manage first hand what movies are shown in my home.



I do however enjoy sports programming in HD.



I prefer the FULL HD thus utilizing my full screen capabilities, but I noticed that some of the channels appear to broadcast in some limited format, thus cutting my my screen by nearly 30-40%



I am looking forward to when the following will be available in HD through Verizon, in order to keep me from switching.



VS for Hockey games!!!

Fox News - the best media outlet there is

Fox Soccer Channel and other Soccer programming



More sports, more history/discovery, more crime documentary shows...these in HD would be some great additions.



Again...FULL HD broadcast would be greatly appreciated...it appears as though local stations broadcast in a limited HD and this is somewhat annoying, but it is what it is.



So if I didn't already have HD in my home, I probably would wait until HD had more channels...or find a service that had a larger HD offering.

Answer 92

My reason for not getting a HDTV is mainly because I'm a gamer. I'll explain:



First off: HDTV PDPs, LCDs, OLEDs and DLP TVs (and other types, those are just the main HDTV technologies) all have video lag because of their slow responce times (yes even PDP and OLED has a slower then ideal speed for gaming) which automatically should put them off the list of TVs for all gamers. Even when you attatch component cables to upscale the signal from 480i to 480p or higher depending on the game console, lag is still noticeable. This is highly noticeable when playing Rhythm games such as Guitar Hero or sports games with a swinging/kicking meter.



That leaves HDTV CRTs (Tube TVs) left. That is fine for modern gaming consoles (with the component cables mentioned above) Such as the Wii, Xbox 360 or PS3, but HDTVs leave slightly older gaming systems such as the PS2 and even older ones such as the N64, PS1, SNES, Genesis, Etc. completely unplayable because the TV must "downscale" the signal to 480i/240p and that takes quite a bit of time for most TVs to do (up to a half second). Combine that with the above technologies (not the CRTs) and you have even more video lag.



My second reason for not getting a HDTV, is that I don't see a major difference in picture clarity from SDTV like advertised. My Uncle has a top of the line Samsung 26' LCD TV and I don't notice any difference in picture clarity compared to my 2005-made Magnavox 19' SDTV(that I got for FREE!!!, lol!), even when watching HDTV/Digital programming. I might even say my Magnavox looks better! It's probably because LCD pixels are slow to begin with, creating a blurry picture in motion. In fact, I would also say my Magnavox is better in terms of contrast ratio. The Magnavox's blacks are REALLY black and the Samsung's are more like a dark Grey. But regardless of the LCD's natural slowness, the manufacturer still is promicing a better-then-SDTV TV picture and I'm not seeing it.



There are some small advantages with HDTVs though that make it appealing to buy one such as thinner sizes, a flat screen with perfect picture proportions (no bent picture on a round or flat CRT picture) and light weight allowing for more placement options such as hanging it on a wall. But overall when you find a place for your new TV you won't be moving it much other then to dust occasionally so neither of those reasons are enough to buy them.



The third and final reason is cost: They're way too expensive for what little benefits they have. I doubt they will ever improve the TV-watching experience enough to warrant the qu

Answer 93

To be frankly honest, the prices of the TV and the packages are not reasonable in my opinion. With the cost of gas prices and the economic recession there are just better thing to be spending my hard earned cash on. Besides, we are paying for the HD service even when we are not using it because in my eyes, most of the time we're out of the house working or doing other things. If you actually look at the time spent in front of the TV, it's a very small percentage compared to the percent of money spent on the HD service and HD TV. We spend so much on this luxury but spend very few hours utilizing this service. Sometimes I'll just come home, watch the news and go to sleep. The weekends are the only time I may get time to watch sports. Yes, maybe with HD, I can see the threads on the football but is that a need for me? Not with the current costs. Besides, with some of the costs, it's cheaper to actually go to the games and experience it. That way, I already have my two God given eyes and that is the ultimate "HD receiver".

Answer 94

I don't watch TV. The only time I need a TV is when I bought or rent a movie. Price is a major factor. If I can get a comparable standard-definition TV at a cheaper price, I will buy it instead of a HDTV. It doesn't matter to me that the images are super fine with HDTV. When viewing, it is the content that matters most. Yes, it's pretty to look at, but does it has substance? For now, I'm taking a wait-and-see position. HDTV may or may not go mainstream. If it does not, I'll be saving a few dollars by not purchasing it on impulse.

Answer 95

My family actually bought the HDTV package recently. I think it's a really good, worthy buy. The picture is really good and clear. However, it is a bit expensive and thus, many are avoiding it. In addition, I think Verizon needs to have better service. I use them as my cell phone carrier and every month they charge for data, even though we cut data off the phone. We have to keep on calling monthly, but it never stops. If people get this kind of service, of course they'll avoid buying Verizon's products. I still use Verizon for t.v. and and cell phone, but they could make a couple of improvements regarding service and price. :)

Answer 96

I think the price in the economyony is a main reason. I also think that the fact that we are having big businessess shove this down our thoughtst's tick's me off and also why should we subsidize the businesses by paying for two forty $$$$ coupons out of our tax tdollars for every family in the United States. When did our tax's start paying for this kinda of B/s. If the industriesrie wants to force us to have HD shouldn'tdnt they pay the cost to convert analoglag to digital TV. This is just another e x-ampl of letting Big businessess dictate to the customer on the customers dollar.

Answer 97

well my dad like 5 months ago got HDTV because he loves to watch NHL hockey on the best quality so that if there is a replay it can be clear if the puck did cross the blue line or not. in year 2004 when the Flames got to the finals against the Tampa bay lightning there was an question about the save or not a save that khabibulin made on the flames my dad thought it was in and i did not thought it was in so that is why we decide to have HDTV for clearer view to see if the puck was cross the blueline.

Answer 98

I do not need HDTV. I watch television for local and national news. We occasionally watch a movie or two. Explain to me why I need anything more than what I already have.



I spent $350 on a 36" television that has a great picture, but I watch it two to three hours a day. What cost to benefit factor can you use to convice me I actually need an HDTV?

Answer 99

I am happy with my old tv. Eventually I might get a bigger one and since Walmart only sells the high end tvs now I guess I'll have to get one of them....in a few years once the price go down. I am not one who have to own the newest electronic gadget. Heck I have yet to get me a cell phone and really don't need one. Price is really the only thing I look for in stuff I am buying. If I can get it for cheap or on sale (after Thanksgiving sale?) I am getting older every day and my eyesight and hearing is only getting worst so why do I care if I have high definition or digital or not...I won't be able to tell the difference anyways. It's nice that they are gonna try to force people to get new tvs and dvd players....and whatnot. Thanks for getting rid of vcrs and our old (and cheap) tvs. Guess I will read more books.

Answer 100

Some of the HD channels work really well, but others still look like to old classic cable with all the pixels filling in right before your eyes. And How about the people who actually live in the "HILLS" as they would say? Really are they going to be able to receive HD television signals?



It's all about price, money and who can actually afford the luxuries.

Answer 101

Certain Channels I'm waiting for? Hmm.. I'm more into HD Gaming Channels such as G4TV and Anime. Anime in HD would look nice.



Only thing that well affect my decision to get HD is because, its the new thing now. Everyone i know pretty much some kind of HD at there homes. And as technology grows its more demanding to have it.

Answer 102

Yes, HDTV has a beautiful picture on an HD set, but the price is way too steep. It's just television, after all. There's nothing on there that I can't see just fine on my current standard definition television. If the price ever comes down to rival standard def, I'll get one. Until then, my current TV is only about 2 years old. When it dies sometime in the future, I probably won't have any choice but to get HD.

Answer 103

I don't buy something until the old is broken. I won't get HDTV until my current TV breaks and I have to buy another. Besides, I don't watch that much television, most of the time it's on just to keep me company (I live alone). Much of the television that I do watch is old shows, which would probably not be as good in HDTV to begin with.

Answer 104

I don't watch TV. I do watch DVDs and streaming video on the internet, but because we have the licence fee in this country, i cannot justify spending money on a service i wouldn't use simply to own a device which can pick up broadcast television. I also don't like the large screen size, which i find dominates the living room in a way which i find disturbing. I also think plasma TVs use up too much electricity. Frankly, i would be happy if TV was still 405-line black and white with two channels, and think there are better things to do than watch it. I'm also unhappy with the effect it has on my children's attention span and expectations of life, and see it as a negative influence. I don't like the idea of not being able to choose what's on the screen, which is what TV amounts to. Besides that, i think it's important for analogue TV broadcasts to continue and for analogue TV to be available for emergency purposes, such as in natural disasters, and analogue switch off concerns me for this reason too.

Answer 105

The HDTV's are very expensive and until the primary televisions in my home fail, I am not just going to go out and spend 10-15 thousand dollars to re-tool my home. Over the course of time we have ended up with 4 televisions in our house and there is no way that on any particular saturday that I am going to go and pick four new televisions.



There are too many channels as it is... too many reasons to sit and watch TV. Tivo makes it worse... while it allows you to be doing something else and watch later, it belies the fact that maybe missing a show here and there is not such a big deal and that just maybe, no offense to HDTV, the quality of the programming coming into our homes is more important than the image quality.



TV has made us a fat, slow, and lazy nation... and that is reason enough to avoid spending thousands on new televisions.

Answer 106

I got a Samsung big-screen plasma TV and it's an HDTV. FIOS is unavailable here, so I have Optimum (Cablevision), HD channels are free, so I have them.



Honestly, though. I can't see ANY difference between HDTV and the same broadcast in standard format. Maybe it's just me, because most of my friends insist that the HDTV picture is far superior. But I can'r see it and if I had to pay for it I wouldn't have it.



Plus, for whatever reason, the sound keeps dropping out on the HD channels,

Answer 107

My dad has it and although the picture is nice, it seems he is always having to adjust it. Also it was big, big bucks. My mother can't figure it out and just watches her own little 13' regular tv and is happy.



To me there is no cost/benefit factor. My own 35" regular screen PIP tv is just great. It is without a doubt the best television for the money. The same TV would cost three times as much in HD and I'd pay double the cost for service. Add to that that I only watch about an hour to an hour and a half of programming a day and it just isn't worth it to me.

Answer 108

Among my friends, only the home theater geeks have HDTV yet. We finally got ours last year after our "perfectly good" tube TV gave out. The prices for comparable HD sets was ridiculous, and they're still too high to just say, "Hey, let's go get a new TV."



I should add that the cable company really needs to stop charging extra for "digital" and "HD" service because it will be *THE* broadcast standard after February.

Answer 109

Me personally, I have 2 HD TV's, I would never go back to anything less. For me, it's for the sports and my video games. My PS3 plays Blu Ray movies and of course the games and I get the most out of my system by playing them in HD. I have Direct TV and I have nearly 60+ channels that support it, and basically I'm planning ahead, because I know soon every channel will be in high def.

Answer 110

I don't even want HDTV.



1.It's way too expensive!

2.It takes more electricity. That results in me paying more for the electric bill.

3.It hurts the enviroment. When you throw out an HDTV, it hurts the enviroment more, and it takes up more power, which hurst the enviroment too.

4. It's pointless. All I want is a TV, I don't care if it looks like I'm looking out a window.





The End. I never had HD, I don't have HD, and I never will have HD.

Answer 111

Price.



For now, there isn't any extra cash in the budget for it. We're new homeowners and we'd much rather spend extra $$ on extra mortgage payments, painting, etc. than a fancier TV set. We don't really watch a ton of TV and don't have cable so I'm not sure how much it's worth to us to pay for HDTV to see the 4 or 5 shows we do watch in better clarity.



We plan on just buying the converter for now. Maybe 5 years from now prices will be low enough for us to consider the upgrade.

Answer 112

I don't have HDTV because I don't own a HD television. I would most likely subscribe to an HD package with my satellite provider if and only if I had an HD TV. Otherwise it's pointless. My Flat Tube television is still working, and until it breaks, I won't be getting a new TV.

Answer 113

There should be no hurry or worry for having to buy a new HDTV's etc. unless your old TV has done it's life and not working anymore. Don't run after fad's that everyone has it !! Look after your priorities first e.g. education, mortgage/rent, food, clothing's etc., Don't buy things on credit cards unless you can pay them at the month end to clear all your debts. Luxuries like new TV and cars will only put you more in debt unless you can pay hard cash for them right away, then its ok.

Answer 114

The current technology for HDTVs is still underdeveloped. I have sony xbr970 CRT HDTV because CRTs TVs are the only ones good for gaming. Even the most expensive LCD HDTVs still have lag and nausiating image smearing while plasma burns in image. I'll wait until they come up with HDTV with response time and durability of CRT and image quality of plasma.

Answer 115

Oh yes, price is a big factor for me not buying an HDTV. Also, I have seen some HD televisions and wasn't too impressed. I find that since the HDTV is larger than standard cathode ray televisions, the quality of some HDTV's I have seen is less than expected. But most brands are clearer, but not revolutionary to me.

Answer 116

NET ADVISOR:

1080p refers to a progressive HDTV signal with 1080 horizontal lines and an Aspect Ratio of 16:9 (1.78:1). All major HDTV broadcasting standards include a 1080i format which has a resolution of 1920x1080, but the progressive HDTV broadcast standards in place right now only allow a resolution of 1280x720 (720p). Currently the only applications using 1080p signals are Blu-ray and HD DVD.



Creating a progressive 1920x1080 signal is problematic because of how MPEG-2 and AVC profiles are structured. Rather than having separate framerate limits for different progressive resolutions they assume a resolution of 1280x720 for progressive video. In practice this has turned out to be less of an issue than it might seem. By limiting 1080p video to the same framerate as 1080i (30fps), the same hardware used to decode 1080i video at 30fps and 720p at 60fps is generally capable of 1080p at 30fps.



Although all 1080p displays can produce a progressive image from 1080i video or an upscaled 720p image, some older models can't actually accept a 1080p input signal. Since its technically outside standard HDTV specifications, neither can 720p or 1080i displays. Newer 1080p HDTVs are designed to accept these full resolution progressive signals, and in fact are generally capable of displaying 1080p video at framerates of 60fps or higher. However, practical bitrate and hardware limitations make this a purely theoretical possibility at this time.



Advantages

Since almost all HDTVs are progressive in nature, even when they're designed for interlaced display, 1080p is a natural evolution of display technology. As HDTVs have gained in popularity, so has proper (progressive) treatment of progressive sources, primarily from film. Since HDTV hardware isn't tied to a particular framerate there's no reason that both film and progressive video of all types can't be encoded to remain faithful to the source video.



Disadvantages

As noted previously, 1080p video falls outside the standard encoding profiles for both MPEG-2 and MPEG-4 AVC high definition encoding. This means hardware designed to closely match those profiles may not be programmed to handle 1080p correctly. In addition, since 720p and 1080i HDTVs aren't able to decode 1080p signals it's always necessary to provide an alternate signal, either 1080i or 720p, for the majority of HD displays.





Related Guides

Getting Started With HDTV



Afterdawn HDTV Buyer's Guide

Answer 117

I have already got one, in a sense. I don't have a stand-alone unit, rather a tuner box that ports into my laptop. I like the extra channels availible over the air with the new digital signal, as well as the higher pic/sound quality.



However, I don't watch enough TV to justify the 600 or so for a new unit. Still debating on getting one, though it would probably get far more use as a big computer monitor!

Answer 118

I might actually care about HDTV if television was the center of my life, but it isn't. My televisions serve me well, and it's really not worth spending thousands of dollars more on something that seem to make only a 5% difference to me visually.



I should also mention that it irks me to know that some people out there are struggling financially but still feel it necessary to spend the money that they barely have on a brand new HDTV...but I suppose that's a whole other story.

Answer 119

As of right now it's a money factor. First, I don't have an HD Television, so why pay for it? Second I find the televisions to expensive for my income. I am a single father, and a nice HD flat screen TV would be nice but it's a luxury I cannot afford.

Until the prices come down, I will have to be happy with my basic digital cable and older TVs. I do, however, want and enjoy HD TV very much. The color and picture are just awesome.

Answer 120

The Brilance of HDTV compared to Analog and Standard Definition.

Answer 121

I have a satellite converter through Dish network for my old timestyle TV, the cost of buying an HDTV are too high for now, I will hold off till the prices are down.

Answer 122

What effects me is the cost of the package. TV right now is basically free. So if I am going to upgrade to HDTV (which is not a neccessity), I would want lots of channels that display in HD for a low price.



EARN MY MONEY!!!

Answer 123

My name is not Jones so I do not have to keep up with them. I'll wait for the kinks to clear after 2/09 and for the price to drop. In my area, HDTV is received on my 9 year 9", 11 year 13", and 23 year 19" and the picture is received most of the time with no thanks to Comcast.

Answer 124

HD televisions cost money, I need my money for groceries and gasoline.

Also TV is just TV, there ain't nothing special about TV. All of these cable and satellite companies trying to get our business don't seem to realize that they can offer a thousand channels but they cannot guarantee quality of programming on any channel. I'm sick to death of all the crap that is on local and cable channels. On a Saturday afternoon I still cannot find something entertaining to watch. So as far as HD TV goes, I'm waiting on something good to watch.

Answer 125

Richer picture quality basically and I must stress that it IS in fact worth it. Once you have and HDTV, you're good to go. They're also compatible with many new gadgets that are being developed which makes it all the more, better as opposed to when you have an ordinary standard definition telvesion set.

Answer 126

I'm not planning on getting one in the future unless someone is willing to foot the bill. Heck I don't even have a tv at this point. If I did, I'd be happy with just a regular tv to get basic channels and a simple dvd player.

Answer 127

Many reasons for not getting it.

1. Number 1 is price - I wouldn't mind paying extra for the TV but paying more for the service is too much.

2. Quality of Non-HD programming - When I see what "regular" tv looks like on my friends' hdtv, the quality is much worse than that of a regular tv. I don't know if that is true for all of them, but I was unimpressed.

3. DVR - Most DVR's (including my current one) can't handle the memory for HD programming anyway, and I watch all of my non-sports programming after it has been aired. Given the choice between DVR and HD I choose the DVR ten times out of nine.

Answer 128

HDTVs are not just for watching HD channels coming from TV stations / digital cable subscription. HDTV is made for watching high def shows in pure, pristine digital format such as movies on blu-ray discs that you can treasure and enjoy over and over again all your life. It is also for enjoying 1080p capable video games such as PS3 if you are a hardcore gamer.



HDTV are only for videophiles. And for those who have 20/20 vision (to enjoy the amazing images and graphic details) . Besides budget of course. Buying an HDTV is not mandatory. But for sure it's a must have piece of appliance. After all, CRT/tube TVs will be gone very soon.

Answer 129

We got a 44 inch HDTV LCD flat screen. We get a few channels in hi-def. We can live with that. The cost of paying for more is just too high. Eventually the cost will go down and we will get a hi-def package. But not at current prices. They are obscene.

Answer 130

I wish the HDTVs were less expensive. $1500 for a TV that looks nicer, but a tv that has a screen that I can't even tell is any clearer. I'd rather just another 35" tube tv for $300, than get an HDTV that's 35" for $2000.

Answer 131

Digital and high definition television are two of the best things that have ever happened to home entertainment. The picture and sound are so much better that once you experience it you will never want to go back to standard analog tv. It really is that good.



The biggest problem keeping people from buying into the new technology right now is price. But that is changing and sets are becoming more affordable.



I needed a new tv anyway so I went ahead and took the plunge and bought a 26" Samsung 720p, (max resolution1080i) lcd flat screen. It was just over $650 on sale. Not really that expensive if you consider the life and quality of Samsung products. Would I have liked to have had a bigger set? Of course but the one I chose was what I could afford. It works great with my Playstation 3 and LG Super Multi dvd - ram recorder and I couldn't be happier.

Answer 132

Because of the economy and gas price we just use internet to view anything on TV, I really have no idea whats going on CNN or Local News. And if I put a TV antenna up I hear its not gonna matter in a year, everybody will have to get cable or satilight...so..we get netflix and read the newspaper online. I am not paying 60-100 a month to watch TV.

Answer 133

I thought a HDTV would be a great addition. Piece of crap! Insignia Tv 720p

After a few months of usage this wonderful machine refuses to read my xbox 360 hd and regular cables, and my computer. It is only serving as a screen for my dvd player and im waiting for that input to **** out, also just a reminder, you probaly have to get a new television plan if yours doesnt cover HD..those sneeky ***** =D

Answer 134

I gave my old TV to charity, because, you see, there comes a time in every man's life when he must put down inferior technology, and meet his destiny as a man and get HDTV. Seriously though who wouldn't want sharper more precise details while watching TV? HDTV will soon be a part of every home. It's the order of things. Sorry if this wasn't the kind of answer you were looking for.

Answer 135

i do have a HDTV and I see pros and cons.

First, it is VERY expensive!

not all channels are digital. so you end up buying the digital channels in the hopes of making the HD live up to its crystal clear picture reputation.

In the end I am paying a lot of money and now I am addicted to the new channels and cannot see myself giving them up.



As for the advantages of having it, the digital channels are indeed quite crystal clear and lovely to view.

The installation fees etc and buying the digital box are a one time fee and the monthly fee is not much more than what i used to pay.

Actually bundled with my internet and phone, it is almost the same as what i used to pay before.

it looks GREAT in my living room and is sleek and compact compared to the huge boxes the older nonHDTVs are.



So really, I dont know. After buying it wouldnt go back to the old TV but it is REALLY expensive.

I am kind of waiting for the day when it is more easy on the pocket.



I do own 2 other nonHDTVs, so I havent shifted entirely to HD mode. They have been delegated to the bedrooms now.

Answer 136

I would get hdtv because you get an amazing picture for a cheap price.

Answer 137

In fact my husband researched the web on how to make a homemade TV antenna. Its really simple too. You guys would be surprised, well, I was. Each channel only needs to be a certain length of wire. Its not like those ugly things we used to have before cable came around. It worked just draping a piece of wire across my bushes outside. No we don't have all of those movie channels, but they were only repeats anyway, at least with the Dish. We still watch nature, cooking channels, how-to channels, sports, they are all there just not ESPN. If you want to watch a movie its probably cheaper to rent a movie.

Answer 138

HDTV really does make a difference from normal TV but sometimes it goes fuzzy it you have trees next to your house. The leaves and branches block the reception.

Answer 139

Well unless you can buy a 1080p hdtv then I wouldn't go for it. If your main use for it is video games then you should go with a computer monitor, some speakers, and the cables you need.

Answer 140

As with most people, it has nothing to do with the TV programming. HDTV makes games and Blu-Ray movies look fantastic. HDTV is just a perk (and paying $7 a month to Comcast for HDTV programming is wonderful).

Answer 141

WOW! Is everyone broke? I know our economy is bad but all the excuses for not having a modern TV is ridiculous. Lets do this by the numbers:



1) HDTV is clearly superior to analog or digital reception as the clarity is far greater, making for better contrast, color, detail and clearly depicting the directors image.

2) The sound that accompanies most HD broadcasts are usually Dolby 5.1 or 2.0, far superior sound to analog.

3) Blu-Ray and High-Def Gaming(360/PS3/PC) brings immersion to a new level. This is what technology is all about.



Clearly stepping into our future with a HDTV is a worthwhile and enlightening experience. Also a great distraction from our failing economy, high gas prices and property value decline. Worth the cash, cause unlike gas the TV stays forever.

Answer 142

I have spent over $5000.00 for an HD TV 67 inch tv and the High Def programs did'nt look any different than the regular digital channels.

I had Direcway and now i have a cabel company that offers HD but from past experience i dont want it.

Answer 143

Prices are still dropping fast. Every month I wait the TV I can get on my budget gets better and better. Once I can get a 120 Hz, 47" (Plasma or LCD doesn't really matter) or larger for around $1,000 I'll buy one.



I figure this will take 18 months to 3 years from now.

Answer 144

I got HDTV because we bought a new TV. If its the regular channels playing then it will turn blurry. Also, not quite satisfied with the HDTV because it doesn't offer the channels that I wanted in my area.

Answer 145

A whole list of financial reasons for not getting one that take priority over having HDTV:



Food

Mortgage

Various Taxes

A host of Insurance needs

Utility Bills

Medical Bills

Gasoline

Car maintenance

Clothing

Children's Education

Charitable Giving

Home maintenance



Need I say more? It all boils down to WANTS vs. NEEDS. People forget that part. We don't need an HDTV, no one needs it.



Our tv works fine, we already have Directv, we don't even need that. Now companies are trying to push the HDTV craze to make consumers think they need it as well.

Answer 146

I bought a 42 inch wide screen High-Def (1080i) TV in 2004, mainly for my home theater so I can better enjoy my wide screen DVDs. (Looking forward to getting Blu-Ray when prices drop some more!) But it also picks up over the air HD signals, and I'm lucky enough to live near a city which which has broadcast of the major networks in that format. Just as my friends are surprised when they see how much of the picture is cut off to make a full screen DVD, they are also surprised to see the extra width of a HD broadcast, in addition to the added picture clarity. Sporting events are much more enjoyable, and many prime-time TV shows, such as CSI are in HD.



I still have several "old style" TVs which I will keep for a while longer. Then I'll sell them over the next few years to those who think there is no difference. (To those people... "digital" does NOT necessarily mean the show is in HD!)



I don't plan to get a digital cable or satellite HD package, unless the variety goes up or prices come down. I'm happy with my over the air network broadcasts in HD (for now)

Answer 147

TV's used to break down and not last long when you had tubes and the old fashion tuner before the remote control.



now TV's and VCR's and DVD (and computers) last a long long time

and if a car could last this long the car compaines would not be able to

stay production at the current rate.



Most people have several TV's that will be used before they spend the

money on the new HDTV..I seen the picture of the HDTV and it is impressive but not enough t o switch until I have to



I am retired but I look foreward to the new HDTV but tomorow?

Answer 148

HDTV is fabulous. It's amazing how much more enjoyable ALL programs are in HD. I've had my 55 " LCD Rear Projection for 3 1/2 years now. I've replaced the bulb once. The TV is as beautiful as ever. I switched from cable to satellite a few months ago and got many more HD channels.

It really changes your viewing habits.

Answer 149

I remember when all television was black and white. In the 1960's, TV Guide used to put B&W or COLOR next to the television show's name. You had to *Get Up* to change the channel or adjust the 'rabbit ears'.



If a plane passed by, you had to wait for the signal to come back. The Victor television we had was advertised as 'portable', opposed to 'console'. That 'portable' weighed in at over 100 lbs. My mother used to laugh at it was billed as 'portable'.



Around the channel selector, there was the fine tuner. That's if the station's signal was not quite right. Some days, you turned it to the left, other days, to the right.



Our neighbors had a TV with a remote. It had a cord. When remotes went cordless, you had three choices: Power, Channel Selector & Volume. It used 'ultrasonic technology' and you had to push the slider very hard to get it to click, no batteries, though. Usually the TV would 'hear' it. No difference there.



When you turned the TV on, it would take about fifteen seconds for the tubes to warm up. The sound would come on at about ten seconds and then the picture about five seconds later. When you turned it off, it went off right away except for this white dot in the middle of the screen. That would take about seven to ten seconds to fade out. So sad.



TV was heavily censored. When Lucy of "I Love Lucy" was "with child", she couldn't say "pregnant" on TV, she was an "Expectant Mother".



Nothing gross ever was on the TV and you could trust them not to scare you, except during Hitchcock or Twilight Zone. When pictures started coming back from Viet Nam, it all started to change. A scared public makes more purchases.



Now, I have to close my eyes during the Discovery Channel promos while some jack eats a worm on TV, or some girl gone wild embarrasses me in front of my wife. Sure, I can change the channel, but ITS A COMMERCIAL. You used to change the channel because of bad programming. Thanks for setting a good example, media.



No, really; there are times I'm GLAD it's not High Def.



I can afford it but I can see my current television fine enough. I push the remote, the television turns on. I push another button and it changes the channel.

Answer 150

I won't get another TV until my old one wears out, which it hasn't yet done. In addition, I just moved from one end of the country to the other, and expect that I will buy a home within a year. It seems more sensible to retain my old electronics at least until i am finished moving, so that I don't risk ruining the new ones. My failure to buy HDTV has nothing to do with a failure of HDTV, but is a consequene of my recognition that I don't have to instantly own every positive technology available.

Answer 151

What's an HDTV?



lol. I have a TV, and I don't have cable, meaning I get channels 5, 7, 11, and sometimes 23. It's probably because I make around $7,000 a year, am in college, and way too broke for pretty much any and every luxury there is, that I don't get a fancy HDTV.

Answer 152

Because my old 25-year-old TV my mom gave me works just fine. I get three channels from a six-dollar antennae I bought at Target. That's all the money I'm going to spend on TV. I do have a DVD player though...I'd rather spend money on a cool movie (or read a book) than watching crappy reality shows, pointless sports, or dumb drama shows like Grey's Anatomy.



Not to sound bitter about it....just that people are flabbergasted as to why refuse to get cable.

Answer 153

i actually have a sony HDTV with verizon network and couldnt be any happier with my tv. and when i say tv i mean the tv is great. people cannot understand the difference untill they see it with their own eyes. HD is not just some marketing thing it is a world of difference. as far as verizon network i am not a big fan. verizon cuts out all the time and has few hd channels.

Answer 154

All the TVs in my house now are in perfect working order, and I have satellite TV service. My satellite service gives me a digital signal anyway, and it's perfectly acceptable for me and my family. I'm not replacing my current TVs with HDTVs until the current ones die. There's just no valid reason to spend the money until then.

Answer 155

First of all lets just say I have other things to buy like oh say GAS, FOOD, especially with the prices rising an HDTV is out of the question.



I'll get an HDTV someday when it becomes affortable. Until that day, my old 1996 TV will do just fine.

Answer 156

I am waiting for the price points to come down. I want to get the most bang for my buck with resolution and screen size. We only watch movies so we will also be updating our DVD player as well. The gear I have is obsolete but it will work until I can get the best deal. Let the early adopters pay the higher prices. Waiting is good because Plasma's are more reliable now and Blu-Ray won the HD war. I am relieved I do not have a HD DVD paperweight or less capable but largely more expensive TV.

Answer 157

The cable company in my area says they do not have the capability for HD TV - crazy huh?



But I just put in an order for DIRECT TV - so I will now be getting it.



EDIT: September 16, 2008 Wow, I curse the day I ordered the Direct TV!!! First, they have not got my order completely installed. I see hardly any difference in the HD part of it at all. They are charging me - yet they have not completed my order and I am beginning to wonder if they will. I tried to cancel it and they say they will charge me a total of over $600.!!!!!!!! PLUS they will not come and get the junk they have polluted all over the place even if I DO cancel - like all the wire they left all over the place nor the dishes which they HAD to put on the FRONT of my house (which they did not have to put THERE ) No, I really got burned on this deal. I will NEVER do this again. I wish I had never called to even ask about the service.

Answer 158

Not getting HD, Why? Because It's just a status symbol, like a Rolex. You can just buy a cheap plastic watch (in this case a non-HD television) and it does the same thing as the more expensive Rolex. I just want to tell the time. But you know how the saying goes to a salesman, time is money lol.

HD was probably invented to see how much money could be milked from people to buy something:

a.) they already have

b.) don't really need and

c.) at the highest possible price.

Answer 159

The Price for the TV, plus the Price for monthly subscriptions for Fios, Comcast, Dish etc., plus all the little things like buying a up conversion box for watching DVD's or Blu Ray and getting the true HD picture.

Answer 160

Yes i do want an HDTV, cause i want to watch certain channel that is hd and high wuality visual. But most HDTV being sold here is either incredibly expensive or sold out.

Answer 161

Right now, I have little time for TV. Most of the stuff that is on my television is for my kids who are 5, so it's basically children's programming. Not somthing I am in need of high definition viewing of!

I'll keep waiting until the TV's blow up or when they get bigger. As well, the longer you wait, the more prices drop and technology gets better. No rush..

Answer 162

Having a hi-def picture doesn't really matter to me. It's just TV. Besides, I am a cable subscriber and won't need an HDTV set to receive TV channels.

Answer 163

I am sticking with my old satellite setup that converts the signal to HD. I will stay with it until it does not go anymore.

Sure, HD TV is great, I have seen all the TV's at the local stores and I have to admit that the image is fantastic. On the downside, TV at most of the time is downright boring, and full of repeats. It is nice to have the TV technoligy. I just don't see that it is worth spending out all that money to watch repeat after repeat of TV shows on an expensive HD TV. Sorry.

Answer 164

I don't see what the BIG deal is about HD or even a HDTV?

I have a regular tv and no cable, satellite or anything but my rabbit ears. And I'm totally fine. And this 2/17/09 date when all tv will go digital is just stupid. I went and got that converter box and it's worse than rabbit ears. I can easliy adjust my attena but w/ the box..it's just stupid. Sorry to go off on bunny trails. Just had to vent a little.

Answer 165

I am not wasting my money on HDTV because I don't NEED it. Yes I watch a lot of television and DVD/VHS movies.. but for what is being charged for the HDTV sets AND the box that is required..



It is not worth the money. And frankly, with the quality of television today.. I am not likely to change my mind. Sure I would like to see some HDTV sports..but it really isn't necessary or justifiable.

Answer 166

Complete waste of time and electric. If you want a good image, then get outdoors and see some real sights. I don't own a TV at all and will only watch the box when I'm with someone else, and I don't often do that. Most of the stuff on the tele is complete rubbish, followed by adverts from people trying to sell you rubbish, followed by more rubbish. Most people don't actually switch on to watch anything in particular, but to the find the least abhorrant program on to waste their time watching.

Answer 167

Us that are on disability, can not afford a new TV. Its the working class that has the credit cards maxed that are buying them, the people that can afford the New TV they just go buy what ever there told by the sales man because they don't have any knowledge of TVs, like Hurricane Gustave the poor aways suffer the most, and get the cheapest type of TVs or Hand Me Downs, So you mean if you have the money , The Koreans make The best TVs

Answer 168

Too expensive. Have 2 TVs that work perfectly and am on cable. Now I hear there is another method in the works that will be 4 times better than the current HD. I'll wait until the shakeout is complete.

Answer 169

I know someone with HD TV and was not very impressed with it. The HD channels looked good, but nothing spectacular. However, the channels that aren't HD come in sooo crappy.

I don't see any reason to buy a HD satellite box atm.

Plus, I'm not in charge of my family's TV choices

Answer 170

Can't think of any reason I should waste the money on it.



I don't have a plasma screen, and don't want one. Do I really need to be able to count Meg Ryan's nose hairs when I put on a movie? If I am watching a football game, why should I care that I can see the grass stains on the guy's uniforms and tell if the quarterback shaved this morning?



What do I "need" all that "Hi-Def" for?



My TV's work just fine the way they are.



I don't need it, and don't want to pay for it. It adds nothing to my life (my life involves more than just TV) and it costs a lot of money.

Answer 171

Right now I have a perfectly good TV. That's what's keeping it. HD would be nice, but I really don't care enough about it to get it. It's just TV, It's not like there's actually anything to watch with it these days. Sports are about the only thing interesting on TV these days. That and Mythbusters... And I'm not shelling out a thousand bucks for two shows.

Answer 172

I don't get HDTV because I have a subscription to Netflix and get Blu- Ray movies in 1080P sent to me. HDTV is nowhere near 1080P right now. I'd rather watch movies with awesome visuals then inferior T.V. that lacks storylines and plots that is barely where Blu-Ray is at.

Answer 173

i don't like digital quality. all this BS about "better quality" is pure hogwash. i lived in south korea for a year, and most cable channels there are already digital. when it rains or there's any disturbance in the signal, part of the screen breaks up and gets pixellated. analog handles adverse conditions way better than digital.



speaking of pixellation, digital images don't blend together. try watching a video online, and expand the image to full screen. the edges of anything that moves looks blocky and chunky. how can people possibly say this is better than analog?



and i'm not just peeved about quality. what is this cr@p with the gov't forcing this down our throats? gee thanks for the coupon, that really helps with my portable TV that DOESN'T HAVE A CABLE-IN JACK.

Answer 174

I have a HD converter. I live in the downtown area of Chicago. Some of the HD channels I can get some I can't. I have trouble getting a good signal. I don't watch TV any more because my signal always scrambles.

Answer 175

I didn't actually intend to buy my hdtv when I did. My wife and I were really shopping for a refrigerator for her mom for Christmas. The salesman at the appliance store showed us some hdtvs. I wasn't really interested but I could see my wife was. When the salesman offered to throw in a refrigerator for free, we decided it was worth it. 2 years of no payments, no interest. Pretty sweet. Now we have DISH network, the leader in high definition television, and we have more than enough high definition channels.

Answer 176

Nothing much good on anymore that could be shown in HD. Boy Meets World, Married with Children, Friends, Seinfeld, Martin. Certain movies are the only exception.

Answer 177

I really don't see the difference in HD and regular TV. I have a nice flat screen, so I'm content. (Samsung which is like the greatest company ever)



Also, HD is expensive. I will definitely wait until the price comes down like I've done with cell phones and computers.



Importantly, I would love for the day you can watch shows on your phone with a clear picture...It's too much like dial up 11 years ago. Especially since I'm hardly home to watch anything on a TV.

Answer 178

Unnecessary expense at this point. We have three TV's that work perfectly fine. We have a large (57 inch?) Sony, that we've had for 8 years that I believe will last forever. My husband and I have an agreement that when it goes, he can replace it with a flat screen HDTV. I think I caught him encouraging the kids to throw a baseball in the house the other day.

Answer 179

HDTV is awesome because it comes in like so much more clear its amazing. I like it because i can understand what people are saying. On my other tv which doesn't have it i have to put the caption on the tv but then i cant see half of whats on tv. Everything is cleaner and more clear. I think some of this is still based on your tv. But when you are watching movies it is like u are in a movie theater.

Answer 180

I'm not getting one because my little old set is doing just fine for me. I watch DVDs and that's about it - I can get anything else new that I'd like to see online. Streaming online is the way it's going - I don't have time to waste with commercials, etc, and why spend the money on a TiVo or similar when I've already got high speed internet?

Answer 181

As a poor college student, I'll have to say the main factor holding me back is the cost. HDTV is great to watch, but hard on the checking account.

Answer 182

My husband actually works for Verizon Communications, but we have not switched to Fios for one major reason. Verizon has yet to sign a deal with the NHL and MLB, so we cannot get the sports packages. Our hockey and baseball teams are not local, so we will not switch until they are available.



We currently have HDTV with our cable provider and it is worth every penny, HD is amazing. I've heard Fios is even better and we will switch the second we can get the NHL and MLB packages.

Answer 183

I honestly believe, after seeing the quality, that everyone would have it. But we all don't have bottomless pockets. When you are a hard working family, trying to pay the bills, HDTV is the last of your expenditure needs.



It's easy to say that you don't have it because of programming schedules, but if the truth be known most ordinary people cannot afford it.



We wish we could

Answer 184

I have an HDTV, but when we got Dish network and told us that we had been hooked up to HD they lied and for 18 months we paid for something we did not have. We went with Direct TV but they want entirely too much money to hook up the HD. So I am not wanting to spend all that money again.

Answer 185

if you like the entertainment of HDTV then yes get one..If you dont care about this then its just like not getting an Ipod or something.

I tell you what though... I have an HDTV and I only watch HDTV channels because of the difference. Thoes who say it not a difference need there eyes checked. Yes its expensive but so are Lambo's and Mercedies etc... There is a difference and in my eyes its worth the money.

Answer 186

The price, the extra box and that I'm happy with what I have. I don't need or want a zillion channels--just want to settle in a watch maybe 4 shows a week. I have better things to spend my time and money on.

Answer 187

Price of the TV, paying for the channels I don't want, all the commercials, repeat channels, sports, "reality shows".... there are more important things to spend my money on other than a new TV where all the channels have the same exact show on at the same exact time or a bunch of stuff that I pay for that I have no interest in. Give me a package where I pick and choose my channels and I may consider it.

Answer 188

The cost. My husband and I don't even have television now period, because it was costing us way too much for the amount of time we spent watching only a few programs. I think satellite companies should offer an option where you can pay per channel and only order the channels you watch regularly. At least they'd be making some money from customers. We'd chose that if it were an option. Since it is not, we don't subscribe all together and just check out movies and shows for free at our local library.

Answer 189

I am not getting any HD TV as of yet until i save enough money to get one getting an HD TV is extremely expensive even getting a small HD TV cost hundreds of dollars and the reason i can buy it because it cant break easily once dropped. Getting an HD TV isnt a walk on the park its very very expensive and sometimes hard to afford. So when i get a well balanced job you can sure bet that i will get an HD tv for my entire family.

Answer 190

To be honest..... I never did understand the hype of HDTVs. I'm happy with my little TV. The quality seems to look fine for me. I don't really see a big difference with HDTVs either so why would I even bother spending an arm and leg for one? I always thought in some cases, things are better off "good enough" and "better than enough". We never should have improved TVs to "HD" quality. TV was fine the way it was.

Answer 191

if you have a blu ray player or are getting a ps3 that looks way better on a hdtv than a norm. tv

Answer 192

Call me old fashion at my age which is 30,I prefer the simplicity of things. I don't need a fancy television or high grade cable/satellite to enjoy shows.That is why I have internet for.If you think about it,for the cost everyone is forking out on cable/satellite which is astromical.Invest your money into something that is useful such as groceries,health care,gasoline. You can find news,valuable information and watch shows on the internet.I don't have television in my home as I prefer not to have it or I do I have the money to waste on something I don't use.As I was told growing up,There is a world to explore and learn,Don't waste your life doing nothing.

I also know how to limit the usage of the internet as well.

Answer 193

I'm waiting for the rush for hdtv to subside. Like all new products the price is always high. As long as my current televisions work with cable I can wait.

Answer 194

I've gotten converter boxes for both my tv sets so have no reason to go out and spend more money for HDTV. When one of my present sets breaks, then I'll probably replace it with HDTV.



I have no desire for a mammoth TV, upgrading to HD would have little effect on a smaller screen.

Answer 195

I have two tvs that work just fine, thanx.

When these ones bust, I'll get flat screen with digital.



I do have the digital package, for all the extra channels, which is probably what the cable companies really care about...

Answer 196

i have an hd tv, i got it because it is big and has a good picture, however i have digital cable and only a small percentage of the channels are high def and i do not have blu ray or a hd disc player, so a good reason for not getting one is that if you dont have a lot of high def sources the picture won't be any better

Answer 197

Our TV broke, so we ended up buying a new 42 LCD HD TV. I have to say, I wasn't too happy about the situation when my hubby told me we needed a new one. But now that we have had it, the difference is amazing. I am not a big TV watcher, because I like books better, but I have some fav shows on Nat Geo, Animal Planet & Discovery that look AWESOME in HD. Plus, when we watch the Chiefs games, or any sport for that matter, its so much clearer. On our old TV, you couldn't see the football when it was in the air.

Answer 198

It all comes down to what's important to me. Cost wise, I don't want to get an HDTV, they're so expensive, also I have a T.V., all I need is a digital converter, which I will get later. I'm in school now, so I have to focus my attention and money on more important matters than T.V. Also, I spend most of my time online than on T.V.; I watch videos online.

Answer 199

I adopted it a couple years ago, but the first and foremost reason people are hesitant is that it's too expensive. Why pay $800+ for a 27 inch tv, when you can pay $150 for the same size, plus, not every channel is HD yet.

Answer 200

For HDTV, the picture is perfection, and it's really good-looking. However, it's simply too expensive to be worth getting. The digital picture is clear and bright enough, without spending all that money. And the boxes for converting it are what, $30?

Sorry, when they come down in price, I'll consider it.

Answer 201

Well as a consumer I'm always waiting for that next "big thing", but the problem is once I get that "big thing" something else comes on the scene that out performs it. The main factors that affect my decision is cost and shelf life so to speak (how long is it going to be the cutting edge to justify me spending my money on it?)

Answer 202

All my TVs work just fine. Why do I need to replace them unnecessarily? If, by the time none of my television sets work, there is only HDTVs, then I guess I'll have no choice but to buy one. But until that time, I'm perfectly happy.

Answer 203

1st off, there are few LCD monitors that dont look "grainy".

2nd and most of all, their price.



Although they are a nice space saver. I think I'll wait until they make a slim version of the CRT. The tubes last longer and you cannot scratch the screen.



Try charging for a quality product and many more people might buy.

Reminds me of when projection TV's first came out.



Everyone was boasting; but I couldnt view their TV from an angle or standing??



Their just a phase.

Answer 204

Television producers must produce much higher quality programming before I will part with any more money to watch a better picture. The offerings now do not merit the picture quality that we are getting, much less the expense of a better picture of the same old garbage.

Answer 205

The cost is what is stopping me! I will not buy a new TV until I have to. I'm sure it would be great to have an HDTV, but I don't have the extra money to buy one right now.

Answer 206

I heard the other day that the Chinese are working right now on invention of an HD that will be many times better picture than the HD available now. So, when will that be available? Kind of like why buy this years model when in two years it will be obsolete? But.. why go two years without?

Answer 207

Because I can get my local channels in HD for free with out paying a dime just by a having an antenna that receives HD signals

Answer 208

I will probably get an HDTV whenever my current TV craps out, but it depends on how long away that is. HDTV doesn't excite me too much. I'm not that worried about having my viewing time enhanced.

Answer 209

I have a HDTV and love the service I get from Fios. I just wish it was offered in true 1080P instead of the 1080i it's currently transmitted in. I also wish Fios offered Howard Stern on Demand like cablevision.

Answer 210

1. Cost of an HDTV and HDTV package

2. I'm content with my digital satellite package... I don't need to see every drop of sweat or blade of grass on a sports field, or every hair on a game show announcer's head.

3. There is still a rather limited selection of HD channels, but this is becoming less and less of a problem.

Answer 211

digital hdtv in tandem with new displays is undoubtedly a revolution in the technology for bringing the shows that they make into your home. clunky old analog transmission and the cathode ray tube have finally been put to sleep. the problem is that, other than sports, the shows that they make are not worth watching. even the news gets tiresome. there has been no parallel revolution in this department. i don't have a tv. i miss live tennis but i can go to a sports bar for that. i don't think i will get a a tv for my home, hd or not, until there is a revolution on the other side of the camera. first give me something worth watching, then sell me the technology for watching it.

Answer 212

I refuse to change anything that has absolutely nothing wrong with it until something happens that forces me to do so. So I probably won't switch to HDTV until months after the supposed deadline. I think it's ridiculous for government to be sticking its nose in television now of all things.

Answer 213

Why get an HDTV? Computers are replacing TV's altogether, get with the times!



I no longer own a TV and I don't expect to buy one ever again.

Answer 214

HDTV is the best thing that has ever happened to me!! The picture is so clear it looks like what ever is on TV is right in front of me in my family room! Who cares about the price...Trust me it pays off sometimes i dont even watch some shows because they arent in HD I'm an adict and i will admit it.

Answer 215

its crazy bc i have cable and now you have to buy MORE things in order for you to view the channels, the package is like 80 dollars more, and its the same tv programs. I love football, but just dont see the point in paying 80 dollars on top of what im already paying, just to see the same thing the next person is watching, just clearer.

Answer 216

I don't like to constantly be forced to up-date electronics by the government or companies. I have a good library of VHS movies. Then DVD's came out. I have a good library of DVD's now as well as VHS. Now HDTV and Blue Ray are the future....Consumers should be allowed to chose for themselves not strong armed. I will eventually get a HDTV and Blue Ray CD player....But I will keep both my old VHS player and DVD player and current TV's as long as they work or can be fixed at reasonable cost.....

Answer 217

I would have to say the price of an HD package, TV and equipment. Also, DVR through the cable only can save 15 paused minutes of live TV whereas the regular digital broadcast goes for 45 minutes.

Answer 218

I shopped over a year and a half to find a price that was reasonable for a brand new flatpanel HD tv.

I still do not have HD service, but will look into that at a later time.

I am also taking a look into the HD antenna idea, which I think takes local HD broadcasts.

All I want to do is watch NFL games in HD on my 46" LCD, which the local channels should suffice.



we shall see.

Answer 219

My problem is with WHO benefits here. Congress has mandated this change forcing consumers to junk what they have in favor of the industry when analog signals stop being transmitted over MY airwaves. And if they want to keep using a perfectly good analog set, they will have to subscribe and PAY for cable or satellite. No one asked ME and supposedly the airwaves belong to ME, the taxpayer. My problem is that congress has mandated that I SPEND MONEY if I want to use a perfectly good analog TV set. So, in answer to who benefits, Congress, from the lobbyists buying them with contributions, the cable and satellite distributors, or the people selling HDTV's. Today, I have several VCR's and a couple TV sets, and I can record several overlapping programs to watch later one at a time, and this change effectively turns this capability I presently have to zilch. My question is, is it worth it to pay all of these people for what is a questionable benefit for ME? How do I, as a consumer benefit from this? Sorry, but simply a better picture quality than I presently have is simply not worth the huge amount I will have to pay to see HDTV in the proper format. Converters change HDTV to my present format, which does NOT improve the picture I see and STOPS me from recording one program while viewing another, and I have to spend money just to continue to use my TV. How does spending money on a converter benefit ME? This whole subject angers me, that Congress would mandate consumers spend money just to continue use of existing TV sets is UNFAIR to us consumers and only serves to put money in the pocket of the entertainment industry. Congress=twits, pawns of the TV and electronics industry.

Answer 220

I enjoy HDTV over the air and have cut my cable out. Granted, less channels but I get my entertainment else where these days.

Answer 221

cuz, number one, the cost is outrageous!, number two, my regular tube television looks pretty darn life like, and number three, i only watch about 4 different channels (Discovery, History, and 2 cartoon channels) and i already have like 60 other channels i don't watch! if i could customize my cable, i probably would only have to pay like $15. subtract that from the $50! why would i spend $50 for some dumb images to appear on a screen? and i walk into circuit city or someplace, i see the HD, and i see NO difference from a regular tube TV. if i were you, i'd pay off my mortgage before TV.

Answer 222

The price is ridiculously high, and every year it gets higher. I HAVE HDTV, and sometimes I wish I didn't because of the cost. But now that I have the TV, going back feels weird and pointless.



Honestly, I'm thinking about just buying TV shows when they come out on DVD, and just cutting TV out altogether... if it wasn't for my addiction to Football and Wrestling...

Answer 223

How does the extra cost make my life any better? It doesn't. Eventually I will be forced to get one because one or more of my TVs will die. Hopefully, the cost will come down by then. I still have a Sony console TV that's 25 yrs old. It works and looks nice, so I'm happy. It's aggravating to me that I can no longer find an SDTV in stores. Hey, I still use VCRs (have 3 of them)! I dread the day when they're no longer available.

Answer 224

I don't plan on getting HDTV because I see it as completely unnecessary. The TV I have works just fine and the picture is as clear as I need it to be. It's just television, for crying out loud. For my health/medical needs, sure - give me the latest technology. But for my entertainment, come on, who really cares? If you're the kind of person who feels like they've just GOT to have HDTV, maybe you need to get some perspective on life and remember that there are indeed still starving people all over the world who don't have running water or electricity, and will never see a TV in their lifetime. When you're sitting in front of your "crystal clear" picture with "amazing vibrant true-to-life color", do you feel like your life has been enriched because you're finally seeing every fine detail of Ray Romano's nose?

Answer 225

Over the air is horrible as far as reception goes and where I live it's about $70 a month plus fees (such as hook up fees) and taxes for a whopping 22 or less weeks of fresh programing on basic cable a year. That's when the cable is working. Also there is very few shows I would watch. It's more cost effective if I just buy the seasons on DVD rather than watch it on the cable. At $70 a month that's $840 a year, but a whole season of a show is about $60 at top price and $30 or less in the bargain bin. With other fees and taxes, that $70 could go up to $80+ a month.

Answer 226

I got HDTV because I got a new TV, a flat panel, and was rather annoyed at the blurred SDTV images. I knew that was coming, but I didn't realize it'd be so bad. I wish for a few more channels in HD (more music, kids networks, and G4TV please!?), but i am very happy with my image quality.

Answer 227

Im not getting hd because the tv's are to expensive and I dont know how to get hd channels, plus I dont think there is that many hd channels, plus does it even make a difference?

Answer 228

For getting:



Large, bright, clear picture

Very natural colors

Slim large size screen picture

Can be used both as TVs and computer monitors



for not getting:



Currently the most expensive HDTV technology. Large TVs are several thousand dollars

Can suffer from “burn-in” resulting from static images

Relatively short life expectancy (20,000 to 30,000 hours)

Relatively new technology; overall reliability is unknown.

Power hungry and generates more heat than other technologies

Answer 229

It is very simple and can be summed up by one word - Quality. If you enjoy watching TV and spending time with family watching movies, or spending time with your spouse watching your favorite TV programs then HD is for you.



Its a way of life for me.



Once you experience watching football, or any sports on a HDTV you will understand the difference, and why I am such a freak about it. I wish there was a direct TV package that offered only HD and nothing else.

Answer 230

At this point in time, I have no particular interest in HDTV. I have a perfectly good TV that works just fine and is PAID FOR, and I don't plan to get HDTV until my existing set goes out. I'm not interested in getting the lastest wrinkle in ANY technology unless it's for my own purposes, and not because some big company tells me that I just MUST have it.

Answer 231

I already tried it with my cable company as an add-on service, and I could see no difference between the HDTV channels and the regular ones. It was a waste of money, so I canceled. Also, few channels I watched even benefited from the HD quality.

Answer 232

Just as with vcrs, dvds, large screen tvs etc., I'm waiting to get the most for the least. HD is in the early stages, the prices will go down eventually.

Answer 233

i have a 62in hdtv 1080p which costed $1300, i just bought it to watch movies with my surround sound system and to play video games, i think its a waste of money buying a hdtv just to watch tv, especially the news, what difference does it make if you watch the news in hd or not, its still news

Answer 234

Ｇｅｔｔｉｎｇ　ａ　ＨＤ tv because it gives you better graphics and a bigger screen plus, it looks thinner and sexier compared to the original tvs.



The only reason in which I think you shouldn't get an HD　ｔｖ　ｉｓ　ｔｈａｔ　ｉｔ＇ｓ　ｐｒｅｔｔｙ　ｅｘｐｅｎｓｉｖｅ．

Answer 235

I don't even have cable. I download whatever shows I want to watch so I can watch them commercial free whenever I want to. I can't schedule my VERY busy life around my TV shows. The little time I have to spend watching TV (2-3 hours a week) isn't even worth the cost of regular cable.

Answer 236

Do you mean an HDTV like from sony or something or do you mean HD programming?



I'm not getting an HDTV because our house is being remodeled and we currently don't have the money.

I'm not getting HD programming because, well I don't have an HDTV

Answer 237

I currently own 4 tv's, reception is through my antenna, no cable. I used the coupons to get converter boxes which work in fits and starts. I live in a heavily wooded area. If I have to, I'd much rather get cable than buy 4 new tv's. But for now, I see no reason to squander money on new tv's.

Answer 238

Well HD is too broadly used for the crappy HD (720i) and for what we realy want (1080p)... i Have 1080i and i went to best buy the other day and saw a clip from pirates of the caribbean in 1080p and it was 2-3x better than 1080i and costs about 2-3x as much. i think you sould actually TELL people who don't know technology what HD they're getting instead of making a huge deal that you're selling a 40" HD TV for $210 when its 720i and bearily any better than 480i (standard definition)

Answer 239

GOOD QUESTION. I am not investing in HDTV because Blu Ray will be the leading technology. Just like many years ago when they came out with VHS vs. Beta -- or music tapes vs. CD. Consumers are being technology riped off. Toshiba has officially announced that it will stop producing HD DVD products, bringing an end to the format war in the meantime buyers should steer clear of the now-defunct HD DVD format. Also, you will notice that you can buy HD products really cheap. They tell you to buy a service plan knowing that it will be obsolete in a few years. Cnet is a good site for reviewing technology.

Answer 240

Here we only have about 12 HD Channels - So what's the point in buying a new tele to get some extra channels which show the same thing's just in HD ? && If you wanted to watch a HD DVD e.g. Blueray I think it's somthing else now... ? Then you'd have to buy another DVD Player - also the extra subrscription of HD is about 15€ + a month...

Answer 241

Price is one reason. I also will wait until my current TV dies and my collection of media is useless. Having paid repeatedly for content I am a lot more cynical about "the latest and greatest." Big deal! I gotta pay for silly things like rent and food!

Answer 242

i'll watch my favorite channels on the internet before i get hd or a box to convert. it really angers me that the government already taxes everything but now they are going to tell me that i can't watch my local news without buying a converter box. Starting to make this country sound less and less like a free country.

Answer 243

well 1st i have a hdtv but right now its going to waste theirs not enough hd sources out their the only thing i have is an xbox 360 and the hd is just for games and not for movies the ps3 does do it for games and movies but i want tv stations in hd for free and non of this subscribe to view them

Answer 244

I bought a 27" Samsung flatscreen tube tv like 5 years ago and it still works great. So I guess I won't buy a HD TV until it finally breaks down.

Answer 245

I have an HDTV but I can tell you FiOS is great. However, there are a lot of billing problems that people I know have had especially around promotions that are promised. It takes a while and sometimes 2 or 3 tries (if you have the patience for that) to get it working, but once you do it is well worth it.

Answer 246

Although HD is amazing (so I hear), I stopped watching TV years ago. Im 23 and I have better things to do than numb my mind for hours a day. So what if I dont know about new music, sports teams, trends, tv dramas, corporation controlled news, or who spongebob is?



When the aliens come I'll be prepared because I spend my days practicing mind-control resistance and building an underground bunker! THE TV SIGNALS HAVE ATTRACTED THEM AND NOW THEY COME TO FEED ON OUR NEURO-ENERGIES! DONT LET THE MAN FOOL YOU WITH THE WAR ON TERROR! BE FREE AND BE READY FOR THE THREAT FROM SPACE!! THE TIME FOR EARTH'S DEFENSE IS NEAR!!

Answer 247

The price. also I live in a state where the budget hasn't been passed yet. The governor has threatened to pay minimum wages. tv or food and rent. I choose the latter two, by the way I don't have cable or dish either. I am using the converter boxes and they are fine for now.

Answer 248

We recently got HDTV and it is actually better. The reason we did so now is because we moved, and could not get cable in our new place, and so we reassessed the whole shebang. We only had one small tv at our old place, and needed at least one new one for our new place. We decided to do a full upgrade and got a new higher-end tv, satellite service with HD included.



Had we stayed at the other place, we would have kept what we had because we were satisfied.

Answer 249

After the DTV thing happened my TV stopped working. I don't care enough to pay for cable, so I just plain don't need or want a TV. (Let alone an HDTV.) Also, price is an issue. I use my TV for watching movies and playing video games, and that's it. So I don't need a HDTV.

Answer 250

I don't really watch much tv. The tv I watch, I download.



And I would certainly never do business with a company like verizon. I tried to cancel my internet and their phone system doesn't let you wait on hold, it just disconnects you after 3 minutes. Slimeballs.

Answer 251

I honestly really don't watch TV.

I prefer my media to be interactive and real, not coming from a one-way tube. I much prefer the internet :-)



If the makers of televisions would make it easy to hook my laptop up to a TV set so I can watch a netflix video on my HD TV, vs my computer, that would be cool, I might get one then, but only if Netflix or other sources provide HD downloads.

Answer 252

i won't get HDTV because it's patently illegal!!!



When they came out with color television in the Sixties it had to be compatible with the existing B&W sets---THAT was the job of the FCC---NOT worrying about what Howard Stern is doing!



Anyway, HDTV is just more channels of CRAP...anything worth watch you can catch on Hulu, YouTube, and a host of other places on the internet:)

Answer 253

I have HD on my bedroom tv. The only reason I have it is because my TV would show terrible picture without it. However, I think HD should come in more channels.

Answer 254

Costly HD TVs, Costly HD cables, Costly HD channels, Costly everything. Sure, the pictures better, but somethings gotta give.

Answer 255

The concept is just too new. Why run out and buy something when the price will go down on it little by little? I will wait until it becomes more commonplace and then I will consider it. My 27 inch Panasonic regular TV is fine for now.

Answer 256

Verizon is a joke. They CLAIM to offer TV service but actually do NOT, because they just don't have it together yet, and aren't legally allowed to offer TV in almost the entire country besides a few select townships. After they sell you TV service, the call Direct TV and have them attach a satellite antenna dish to the side of your house so you can look at satellite antennae tv. Waste of my time and money, even WORSE than the cable company!!!

Answer 257

I honestly have never seen that much of a difference in quality between HD and regular cable programming. Our TV is not HD capable and the difference in price doesn't make it worth it to me. And there are certain things that you just don't want to see with extra clear definition... like say Funniest Home Videos for instance?

Answer 258

Size matters. I wanted a wide screen for our family room, so HD came with the set. I didn't buy the cable package to support it because I had a legacy "package" on regular TV, and the cable company would not convert it to HD.

So I moved to an area where there is no cable, and got satellite service. Went with HD (and a dvr) and love it. Had to buy a new TV for the living room because the older one wouldn't fit, so still ended up with another HDTV. Picture is amazing on both sets. Love the definition (I think it was invented for football).

Answer 259

we havent gotten HDTV because we live in an apartment and my husband really wants a new TV but I am begging him to wait until we buy a house so that we know what size would be best etc etc.

Answer 260

I just got HDTV and I wouldn't go back. In Astralia, ree-to-air channels offer HD content unavailable on analogue.

Answer 261

I don't want to spend the extra money for HDTV. I think it's a rip off anyway. If the providers offer it for free, then we'll talk.

Answer 262

Didn't CBS have a thing on that about HD burning your eyes? If that's the case, then I won't be planning to get HDTV.

Answer 263

I have a HD TV, But am staying with cable because the HDTV services are too expensive for my taste. It's just TV after all.

Answer 264

Don't care to. Nothing is simple anymore and I am happy with keeping things simple. Plus we are not a family who sits in front of the television on a regular basis. We like to find better things to do. Additional to that, the quality of television programming is declining. I really do not care to watch a crappy tv show or annoying advertisements just because the picture has "superior" clarity and quality. Big deal the show still stinks. Plus it's another excuse to raise prices which are absolutely rediculous as it is.

Answer 265

Two reasons



First my old tv still works! So why throw it away?? So I can get the same channels only clear??



Second they cost too much....I'm not going to spend half of my families income for the month on a tv!! How about I go to Wal Mart and come out with food instead??

Answer 266

i got hdtv. i got it only cuz my family could afford it, if i move out, i would probably spend a lil cash for an hdtv. i see some out there for 500 now a days, a decent investment to make i think, i mostly watch t.v. on my comp tho and go to the movies. comps got a dvd player, not a fan of original series and such so no biggie to not have a t.v. for me really.

Answer 267

Yes Verizon I have Fios and I'm STILL waiting for new HD CHannels. You all have abandoned everyone in California and Texas and I am about 1 week away from switching to Dish or DirecTV. The way you treat your oldest/most loyal customers sickens me.

Answer 268

You do not need to get an HDTV.



However, on Feb. 17th 2009, all over-the-air analog TV signals will cease. This will require that you purchase a digital TV converter for a TV that does not have a built-in digital tuner.



Your satellite receiver IS NOT a digital TV receiver. (although newer units may have this feature)



Also, HDTV is 16:9 aspect ratio. Standard definition or analog TV is 4:3. To fully appreciate an HDTV signal, you will need to purchase a TV that will display 16:9 correctly.

Answer 269

I have a HDTV, which will probably be perfect for at least another 5 years +.



Once that's done with, OLED TVs will probably be all the rage, and by that time I may have my own place so I'll invest in one and drool at the amazing quality that is organic light-emitting diodes. HD is nothing compared to OLED.



At the moment my TV provides me with a big picture for freeview, and great quality picture for my games consoles (1080i and 480p), but in terms of television viewing there's no chance I'll be getting something like Sky HD because it's way too pricey. I'm willing to get a Freesat box, but that'll have to wait as I have better things to spend my money on.

Answer 270

I have a 32" HD TV for my xbox 360. Games look A-Mazing

compared to my dull standard def (that was, to be honest, 10 years old anyway)



As far as TV goes, I want freesat (Freeveiw for HD) but with only about 5 HD channels and at £200 whats the point

Answer 271

Price is most definitely the biggest factor of my wallet. I cannot afford this HDTV, and I see nothing wrong with the analog signal, so the forced switch to digital only forces me into buying a stupid converter box, wasting money for something that I already have.



Capitalism imperialism at it finest.

Answer 272

I hardly ever watch TV because there's nothing good on,I use the internet more,and my parents don't want to pay for the HDTV

Answer 273

I love my HDTV. To me it is almost the differnece between BW and color. Their is no comparison. Now there are enough channels to make it worth the extra money per month (DirecTV is only 9.99 extra a month). Worth every penny.

Answer 274

It costs too much, I only watch about 8 hours of TV per week. I pay too much already for channels I never watch.

Answer 275

will the concept of getting great resalotion + multi-functionalities ,,



that is sure great ... but ... its VERY VERY VERY EXPINSIVE!!



I'm a student ... and my income is less than 264$/mo*and NOT ALL THE TIME !*... an HD will not be less than 1400$ so saving for such thing isn't worth it when ,like in 2 years it will devolop yet improve more and more ,,, the old ones prices will drop ,,, so ... not worth it I will use what I have till the prices get decent or till I get better income ...

Answer 276

When we all first got cable it was around 15.00 now my bill is 120.00 and climbing. Yes I love my cable and all the really cool features and the premium Chanel's. But I don't feel most people will be looking to add to their bill, they are looking to lower it.

Besides with the price we pay now for TV it should come with it. After all don't we deserve to see the clearest picture?

Answer 277

My 32" Sony is not broke yet, its not even flat screen, but soon as this dies then yes i will get one.

By 2010, you will probably have to buy a HDTV, a HD-DVD or Blu-Ray DVD Player, and HDTV television service.

Answer 278

My current TV works fine and the HDTV are too costly. If mine dies then I might get one if I can afford to pay cash for it. I never finance a luxury.

Answer 279

cabel is good enough for me.

and HDTV is too exspensive.



Even if I dont have TVguide because of freaken comcast, dosent mean I should go out and buy an exspensive HDTV installment.

Answer 280

well i have had one or year. i believe its the most advanced one out there.

personally i dont care, i would be fine w/ a large regular television but my husband is a total fanatic about HDTV's.

he loves how amazingly clear the picture comes out.

we have 1080p w/ 120hz which is a motion sensor. when a blue ray disc plays truly and honestly it looks 3D and as if you were right there.

everytime someone new watches our TV they totally flip out.

also he is a big gamer so the graphics look really good.



as far as TV/cable...the channels are pretty crappy. so i dont really like that even the HD channels are ughghh and there are not too many of them anyways

Answer 281

The AVERAGE american cannot afford it, and if they do it's normally with their TAX REFUND. And that is just in reference to the Television itself. If you get and HDTV it will only be superior if it is streaming from an HD source such as HD digital cable or HD satelite services. And that is a handful of money every month as well. Lower the prices and make them more reasonable. I think you already have your answer.

Answer 282

Got HD tv with HD satellite to take advantage of high definition display. HD looks a lot better than standard digital and it's a lot better to watch most sports in high def.

Channels I'd like in HD: Comedy, Chiller, and national movie channels like TNT, FMC, etc.

Answer 283

well its not worth getting a hdtv yet for mainly 3 reasons



tvs are still pricely and secondly in my country where i live hdtv channels

are barely offered and number 3 blu rays costs much more compared to DVDs

Answer 284

Don't care for the GD phony reality programs, the police shows that brag how much better the female detectives are than the men,who always have to be clued in by their female partner as though they were mere school boys with juvinile ways of judging human behavior

Answer 285

I can't afford an HDTV, that's my only reason. If I could afford it I probably would, but I just don't have $500 to blow on something when I have a perfectly fine TV that's nearly new to begin with.

Answer 286

well I have seen a HD picture compared to a standard picture but I do not see much of a difference, I don't see what the hype is all about, I say sky one on a 47inch 1080P HD picture then changed to the HD version and there almost no difference, also, the price, if I was going to get a new HD TV it would be 1080P and it would be massive because otherwise it's pointless... but it's pointless already, it's also the same story with games consoles, I have seen Halo 3 and gears of war on HD and standard TV's and see no difference, it other words, HD is a load of bollocks

Answer 287

I don't like stuff that encourages me to slump and watch my super hdtv all through the hrs of the day, everyday. It' in my opinion, isn't worth it if you want to be a television hog. A big no-no. Execept if it was huge, not just any huge but triple the size of usual screen dimensions.

Answer 288

What are the channels I'm waiting for? Uhm, how about ALL of the channels being converted to HD? The cable networks also need to convert ALL of the PPV channels to HD, too.



As service providers, I feel that our cable networks are not keeping pace with HD technology.

Answer 289

Plus I worry about all theses things dependent on electricity. We know that our electric supplier chooses which neighborhood will get electricity and which wont depending on the crisis, even though we are all PAYING for it on a regular basis. In addition to that we see all the new condos etc going up everywhere, even in places one shouldn't put up housing and we don't see any new job hirings, or electrical plants (which are unhealthful) being built.

Answer 290

Im not getting one because



a) there are only a handfull of channels/programs available in HD.



and



b) im fine with my old tv. Why do people feel the need to keep up with this techonology because everyone else is? This world needs to slow down...

Answer 291

HDTV is the greatest pic. It costs a little more but then you just stare in awe at the screen.

Answer 292

I would like it very much if the price of it went down. HDTV is not that much different than normal TV.

Answer 293

We aren't getting one. We have five working tv's in this house.

We get cable so we pay for the tv we watch.

If someone would grant me 3 channels more.. I say

1. Boomerang

2. lifetime movie channel

3. 1 music station

Answer 294

My girlfriens mom has hd tv and beleive me it's not any cheaper then regular tv is yah you might get more chanles but most of them are same as regular tv your waching differan shows. but the sent chanels that you can get on hd are lkie hbo cinamax and other things like that but if i;m corecet you still need to order them the same way you would have to on reagular tv.

Answer 295

i got one set of HDTV and one converter. the reason holding up for the second set is waiting for the price to drop down to $600 for a 42" set and more features (i.e. 120hz become standard)

Answer 296

Why does Verizon care? Don't you have phones to sell? I've had HDTV for a couple of years now. Thanks to DirecTV I can actually get more out of my purchase. More HD Channels. All channels should be HD....

Answer 297

My tivo will not work with HDTV. I'd need to buy a whole new box and begin paying for the service!

Answer 298

Complete waste of money. It's sad that Americans are so high in debt, but cable and phone companies try to portray something as worthless as HD Tv as a necessity...They should be ashamed of themselves. I have more important things to spend my money on.

Answer 299

It's really just the price. If that went down my parents probably would buy one. But I'm only 15 and my dad still kinda lives in the past where he misses the old days. Maybe if they made something that could make older people want to buy a tv or a new gadget then you would probably sell more.

Answer 300

I am not going to get an HDTV. It cost money. I have cable service that costs me $15 per month. To get HD signals, I would have to pay for digital service, then another fee for HD service on top of that.



I have a 19" color TV that works just fine. It would be a waste to get rid of it.

Answer 301

Price: It is prohibitively high.

As a technical issue, HD TV is just a commercial strategy to boost marketability, without defining what it is.

Ever since TV standards were set, the 'definition' of the picture frame has almost been frozen. There was no scope as you may have to change the specification of all broadcasting gear as well as a billion TV receiving sets world wide. What the (TV) industry should have done is to enhance the standards to put proper definition of picture frame to the fore. Define 'definition' that is compatible to human eye. This it failed to do. Human eye has certain limitations translatable to frame rates and pixel spacing (inter-pixel time) and colour definition (or contrast). This is a lucky situation for industry and at least one of them should have revised standards/specifications even if it amounts to scrapping the electronic hardware world wide. The industry lacked courage and chickened out. Now, that the opportunity presents itself face-to-face, they or one of them should grab it with both hands and upgrade (or re-define) the standards to the proposed level.

Such action redounds in view of the specific requirements of 'Computer display screens'. Here it is the definition of letters in a two-tone background that is important. It is a peculiar requirement and implies a much higher spatial frequency to be factored in designing 'screens' for computers to ensure sharp edges and lines. In a movie on TV screen this may not be required as the transitions are smooth, contrast wise or colour-wise.

To sum it up, manufacturers in TV industry, making both transmitting and receiving electronic hardware should sit and draw up new standars accented on definition. Also it should take into account concommitant problem in Computer screens (you can't say 'it is outside TV'). They should collectively bell the 'marketing' cat.

Final comment: Consumer (Customer) should have the choice to choose the standard/technology. But he is not upto the task to go into technical details. Manufacturer has an advantage that the consumer does not demand very stringent technical specs as his apparatus (eye) itself has limitations. Buyer is happy if his eye is happy. I recall an old industry adage 'Don't know squared'. That is the consumers don't know that they don't know (on technical matters).

Answer 302

I'm still paying for my daughter and her (husbands) They have a 32" that they have in their bedroom. I'm looking at a 20 year old Sharp in the living room.... All I have to do is pay for it as usual. What's the difference between punctuation and getting upset. No one else can see you're note re: punctuation.



MOM still paying for it all,pardon me I have to clean the foot prints off my back

Answer 303

We choose not to our home with TV, so HDTV is worth about as much as a bushel of sewage, and it is similar an many ways.

Answer 304

Price and the fact that all 6 of our televisions work perfectly. Until they conk out, we won't be buying HD. Most shows (that damned reality craze ya know) suck anyway so I don't need to see a clearer version of suckiness.

Answer 305

I would love to get an HDTV but i cant afford one at the moment and we still have a good T.V.

Answer 306

hi, well first of all i dont even think HD is available in my town yet, and even if it was, yes its very nice but its WAY to expensive.. first the price of the new tv.. i saw some at circut city for over 3,000$!! the nice ones were 4,000$!! the setup, special equipment, and monthy fee.. i have digital on demand from comcast and thats pretty good for now.... unless it comes way down in price, definitly not happening.

Answer 307

Already have 2 HDTVs Im a UPS driver im not poor like these people Boricua baby

Answer 308

It is a waste of money. We have an HDtv and had the service with our old company and I could hardly tell the difference.

Answer 309

I would buy a PCI TV card in conjuction with the 24 inch LCD monitor of our PC. Also we watch DVDs thro our PC anyway.



Better still, buy a USB TV card so that it could be used on any computer.



Why spend money on a TV when you could have bought a really good PC with the money. A simple $400 dual core 2GB computer, not the $2K all-in-one-multimedia portable entertainment PCs.

Answer 310

I purchased an HDTV (42" Sanyo LCD) for about $450.

They are getting cheaper by the day, so price shouldn't be an excuse.

I have yet to get HD programming from Comcast, but that's because I don't watch enough TV to be worth it. I mainly bought it for my Xbox 360.

Answer 311

i keep looking, and then walking out of the store,,, i go to others homes and see that there are so few actual shows being done other than prime time in hd that i don't feel the need for it yet. i will be the first in line to go hd when the cable networks broadcast full time hd

Answer 312

I am not able to afford an hdtv because i am going to a private school

Answer 313

I feel like I am being nickel and dimed from all fronts. My phone bill, cable, pretty much everything. Besides-I really don't care, I don't need to see everyones nose hairs up close and personal. I am happy with what I have. There are those of us who do not feel the need to keep up with the Joneses and are happy with the technology we have.

Answer 314

2 Reasons

1) My family purchased an HDTV To Replace Our Broken TV

2) We wanted a Widescreen HDTV with a HDMI DVD player so we can watch ordinary DVDs in HD

Answer 315

costs too much. new technology always costs a lot of money for many years. witnesseth the texas instruments calculator. you'll see.



most TV shows are not worth watching, so why should i wait for a show?



have you noticed how thin newspapers are getting?



newspapers are much better than HD TV to learn about what is going on in this country and the world. but, you must make the journalists write in a non-slanted and cohesive, fair way.



web page news is bad too.

Answer 316

Because of money! I have an old TV that I paid $35 for at the thrift store and when I hook it up to my satalite (Direct TV) I still get to watch many of the same programs. Simply, HD is out of my budget. I would rather spend the money on gas and food.

Answer 317

Price is the only thing I can think of right now, Cause everyone need to view real pictures. If HDTV is put together with the normal one and one has to make a choice, I think everyone will go for HDTV.

Answer 318

I dont see the point in getting a hdtv yet, the tv i have is perfectly fine plus i dont have the money to even buy a hdtv

Answer 319

Price!

HDTV is just looked as leisurely item for us to afford.

We're just happy with our normal TV, it gives good pictures and sound, and we use a digital satellite, so the quality is cool too.



Plus we just take ages to come in to the new technology. Like we won't buy HDTV until it completely catches on and everyone is buying it, at affordable prices.

Answer 320

Maybe someone who has control over programming will read these answers and take a hint. Most of the shows on TV now aren't worth watching regardless of the picture quality. A pig in a silk dress is still a pig.



When HD is the only thing available and all of my sets break then I'll consider buying one. However, right now there are too many necessities with ever increasing cost that are more important, think food, fuel, electricity, etc.

Answer 321

I got a HDTV to see shows like Discovery and National Geo. in high def. I love love love it. It seemed like forever that we had an old old old handmedown tv. I have Comcast and it's comastic!

Answer 322

Because the flying spagetti monster told me it was a bad idea.



-



No, seriously... the cost. For the price of one HD television, one can buy a regular television of equal size and still have plenty of money left over.



So why waste the money?



(Also, there really isn't any good television to watch, either.)

Answer 323

I bought mine in response to the digital transition scheduled to take place on February 17, 2009.

Answer 324

Oh, maybe the fact I'm thirteen years old, however, I continue to recieve E-Mails from random companies/people who want to sell me Cialis, Rolexes, HDTV, etc.

Answer 325

I see no point in getting it. Cost. Besides, I only watch one channel and the News.

Answer 326

It is EXPENSIVE and the screen is tiny compared to my tv now. I barely watch tv as it is, so I'm in no rush to get HDTV - everything I want to see is either out on DVD (and I'm patient) or legally available online.

Answer 327

It's not my immediate priority. I'll get the converter box when the signal is no longer available. Other things affecting my decision are other expenses which right now are way more important.

Answer 328

We're all "fiosed out" at our house but HDTV's are wayyyy too expensive for us. We just can't afford it. We'd LOVE to have an HDTV flat screen, especially since are rooms are so small and we could hang it on the wall, but we just can't afford it now. The prices have to come way down.

Answer 329

Because I am on disability, and my check just barely pays off the bills I have to pay, plus my prescriptions and food and other necessities. I don't watch TV much any way, and my TV and DVD and video players are all I need. My TV has beautiful color, if I could get local stations, but I can't afford cable either.

Answer 330

TV is becoming a thing of the past.



Many of the people in the recent generations are smart enough to realize that television programming is a big mess of brainwashing garbage.



It makes everybody think alike and it makes everybody much dumber than they would normally be.



Even the educational channels have programs that are littered with twisted facts and faked footage, because the creators had entertainment & sell value in mind rather than educational value.



That's why I don't have HDTV.

I'm just not dumb enough to be suckered in.





.

Answer 331

HDTV is best. As my Wii comes better, with a special HD component cable. Brill!

Answer 332

Too expensive for me (reason number1)

Compared to Flat screen TV's I don't really see a big difference in image quality if you consider the difference in price between the two of them (Reason 2)

Answer 333

1. I can't afford the tv's they cost way to much.

2. I really don't need a new tv right now

3. my apartment won't allow me to have satellite and they monopolize the cable, and dont plan on upgrading the old system soon

3. if you dont have HD cable, or pay for it,,, the TV wont work as properly

Answer 334

The price. I can not afford to purchase an HDTV until the price drops quite a bit. They're expensive!!!

Answer 335

My parents have it, my girlfriend's dad just got it, most of my friends have it.. and it looks wicked..



The only drawbacks I've noticed are lag when switching channels, i.e. hit 'Guide', it takes a second or sometimes two... how dare they make me wait.



Give me convenience or give me death...



That's no big deal.



But the lack of channels filmed in HD is the main issue, I think. However, I think in the next year, the number will explode. Alot of chennels are advertising the HD switch coming up, alot will occur in the fall line-up.. hopefully...



But the channels than CAN be viewed in HD make it all worth while, the result is spectacular.

Answer 336

I'm waiting for OLED TVs to get bigger (currently the largest is about 11" i think) and cheaper (the 11" one costs about $2500 / £1250 at the moment - if it's even out that is) They're the next step



"This size zero googlebox measures a mere 3mm thick, making it one of the slimmest sets in the world. In addition to taking up hardly any space, it boasts a massive 1,000,000:1 contrast ratio thanks to its OLED panel and it doesn't even need a backlight as it emits light on its own."

Answer 337

We will not get HDTV. We have a very poor signal out here in the wild and don't want television bad enough to buy a good antenna or whatever it takes. TV is at the bottom of our list of wants and is not on our list of needs.

Answer 338

I have other priorities with regards to my money. Like my mortgage, gas, food, day care. My TV works fine, and I see no reason to buy the latest gadget when I have to pay my pills, including the cable bill.

Answer 339

The price.plus when it rains you get bad reception go figure.it's great but i rather not see what people on tv really look like.on the big screen tv my mom has you a 42 inch and i can see a huge pimple on raven samons face.it's all i think about.so now i can't watch that show until it goes away.thank you very much HD for ruining my favorite show.

Answer 340

Poor Energy efficiency

Answer 341

I am not interested to this tecnology, simply because I find it totally unuseful. I am fully satisfied of my dvds and digital satellite broadcastings on my 32" widesceen tv set with dolby digital audio system. Why had I to waste my money to change it? There's no reason.

Answer 342

We bought a HDTV because we also bought a PS3. The games and movies are perfectly clear. AWESOME! BUT we will never use Verizon AGAIN!!!

Answer 343

I have a 36 Inch JVC I bought in 2001 - it works just fine. I'm not going to replace a perfectly good TV with one that has a small difference in picture quality. I can find plenty of other ways to spend my money.

Answer 344

The only reason at this time is cost. Once I graduate college in a few years, it may be an option, but we do have 3 kids as well.



Personally, I'd rather feed my family healthy nutricious meals than have a cool tv to watch and get fat.

Answer 345

Yeah, getting an HD TV is kind of expensive, and the HD channels do not offer enough variety. So really, it boils down to money.

Answer 346

WHY GET HDTV: Simply a clearer, more realistic viewing of your favourite programmes.



WHY NOT GET HDTV: It costs thousands of dollars.

Answer 347

Price. Some people want to have the best of everything, but I am going to spend what money I have on things that matter most to me. To have a slightly clearer picture does not justify (in my mind) to buy a new tv and pay for expensive programming.

Answer 348

I spend a very small percentage of my life watching TV, Therefore, in my situation, paying more so I could have HDTV wouldn't be worthwhile. I'd rather spend my time and money "living", not "watching"

Answer 349

Only reason most Americans DON'T get one is the cost! the economy is doing horrible. Why spend 2,000 bucks on TV when i can get one for 99 bucks! Yes the quality will not be as good, but it will do the job!

Answer 350

The only reason I purchased one is because my TV is getting old.



Otherwise, while the newer TVs look "really good", there is nothing new on television worth watching. Most of the shows I watch came on 40-50 years ago. I doubt much, if anything will be done to the shows I watch to really make it worth the $1,200 I spend for the television. I purchased a Sony 40in. wide screen KDL40V4150.

Answer 351

I don't like TV enough to spend extra money on a new TV so I can see pimples on actors' foreheads. Regular TV is good enough, I can think of hundreds of things I would put on my "to buy" list before a new TV.

Answer 352

Of course I have HD! I have HD tv's and I work for your compeditor, Time Warner Cable. My parents have HD also because Time Warner offers a package where it's completely free!

Answer 353

I'm not getting HDTV because we don't watch TV at our house. We don't even have cable! There are a couple of shows my kids watch on-line but other than that we pretty much rent movies if we find ourselves with a little time for it.

Answer 354

Well first of all it cost allot and also i do not have space in my room. Also my current TV is good and i have had it since 1996. So i see no reason to change right now.

Answer 355

I am waiting until the cost comes down and there are many more channels. Right now, it just doesn't seem like a great value.

Answer 356

Until I know that all the channels are in HD, I will not invest in one, but with the major cable/satellite company's charging for HD but only giving standard. I think ill save my money

Answer 357

I have an HDTV, and the reasons I bought it were:



1.) Everything is much clearer; you can see things in HD that you can't see clearly in SD.



2.) Nearly all of the channels and shows that I watch are on HD. Local News, History Channel, Discovery Channel, Nat Geo, A&E, FOX, ABC, NBC, CBS, HBO, Showtime... I almost never have a problem with a channel not being in HD. The only channel I am still waiting for in HD is the Military Channel.



3.) I bought a PS3 as well, so to fully enjoy next-gen gaming, an HDTV is the way to go.



The primary reasons against an HDTV is that they are expensive, (and it definitely cost me A LOT), and that some people are perfectly fine with what they have. Some people still even have analog TV (though not for long).



I see the price going down within the next few years, just like DVD players and many other electronics did.



The benefits of owning an HDTV, if you can afford it, are obvious every time you turn it on.

Answer 358

Cost. There is no sense in spending three times what I paid for my current TV or only a slightly better picture. My current TV looks stunning with just the digital converter box.

Answer 359

TOO EXPENSIVE...i migrated from Germany and Cable and HDTV is much cheaper...how cheap?? How doe 4.99 euro cost per month...tha's like $7.00/month and don't get me started on home phone and cell phone provider costs!

Answer 360

i am saving to purchase a hdtv. retired and have very low income hope to get one before the end of the year

Answer 361

We watch about 3 hours of TV a week, and usually find it more worth while to put in a DVD of our favorite sitcom so we can skip the commercials.



I would rather spend my time playing with the baby, being outside, playing with the dog, gardening, sewing, screen printing, playing video games, jogging, baking, looking at the internet, checking email, reading, chatting on the phone...

Answer 362

the cost!!!!! reeally expensive. though that is for an enormous television, but it just doesn't seem worth buying a small hdtv for some reason.

because it is so big, i guess it would cost more electricity to run than a CRT television, but i dunno if that would be deciding or not. probably not.

also, playstation3 games only go up to 720p at the moment, so it'll be more worth it when they're 1080p (same for tv channels, blu-ray [or are they 1080p now?], etc.).

Answer 363

why is the fcc fixing what isnt broken-MONEY. hd has about the same problem as before,some channels are more clean than others. so the next time you have to seek shelter & your portable tv dont work,the radio plays the same warning over & over.you will quite literally be "in the dark" .

Answer 364

$ and $ and $..... This is technology still in it's early stages and I will wait and see....when it becomes widespread, much cheaper and available i'll consider it. Unfortunately the "look" of programming does not improve it's content ...and in Canada that is a big issue as Canadian networks do not abiode by CRTC rules in producing enough good indigenous programming , drama and comedy, employing professional casts , writers and crews - NOT reality shows, which are often retreads of US formats transplanted to Canada. It is interesting that Verizon is asking this question no doubt to help them market HDTV to consumers.

Answer 365

The main reason I won't buy one is the cost. Basically they are forcing people into a new format and the price range should be reasonable. A tv should not be more than $500.

Answer 366

i am not getting a HDTV until my butler buys me one

Answer 367

I will have ALL my non-mortgage debt paid off by mid-October. Broadcast TV goes all digital in mid-February. That gives me 4 months to pay CASH for a new TV.

Answer 368

My reason for not getting HDTV is because it's unneccessary. I think it's ridiculous to put that much importance on TV- it shows how out of whack our country's priorities are. No wonder our kids are obese- we put too much emphasis on sitting around watching TV. We should put that much time and thought into giving them activities to get them moving and using their imaginations. If it were up to me, our house wouldn't have TVs.

Answer 369

No money but the only reason why i have one is because we want to get better credit!. Its awesome but for those people who don't have the money there no rush in regards to getting a HDTV .if you got a decent areal your fine and if you want to get digital tv just get a cheap set top box.

Answer 370

I don't see any difference from normal TV and HD, looks the same to me. I know that HD has more pixels and colour. I don't see what the fuss is. Anyway, HD is only available on a few channels, not really worth it yet.

Answer 371

IM NOT GETTING HDTV UNTIL I COULD AFFORD IT.



IM WAITING FOR A CHANNEL THAT ARE DEDICATED TO FANS OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES.



I DO NOT ALSO WANT HDTV YET BECAUSE I DO NOT WANT TO FEEL LIKE A SHOW OFF IN FRONT OF MY FRIENDS & FAMILY.

Answer 372

yes. Good Hdtv

Answer 373

Primarily, price. I've got a somewhat low-end HD set... but I refuse to pay the ungodly prices for something that does 1080p, or for HD cable service right now. I only really bought the set to go with my Xbox 360, anyway.

Answer 374

Well I don't know if I have HDTV or don't but according to dish I have it and if I do then it is very good quality. It's just regular tv to me but I love the new quality.

Answer 375

well hdtv is an example of our todays technology but its not really that recommended to have since the quality of the shows are the much important thing here

Answer 376

I live in the uk and HDTV of a decent size do not come cheap, so i will have to wait a bit.

Answer 377

I already have a TV with a picture that is clear enough for me, I'm also broke and not that much into TV watching anyway if I get some spare money later on I'm more likely to lay them on upgrading my computer/getting a better one anyway.

Answer 378

There's nothing wrong with the picture on a standard TV, what's the sense in buying an HDTV?

Answer 379

well, hi def has a lot of channels mostly sports. the reason i have hi-def is for all the graphics and motion. it never lags. so id say HD is perfect. it also has all the channels a regular TV has and if you want 1 sell you TV and got to work longer.

Answer 380

The reason for getting: The Picture and Sound is better.

Reason for not getting: The cost

Answer 381

The TV I have works fine. The picture is clear enough for me to watch re-runs.

Answer 382

Not really, although I do have an HDTV/monitor (for image editing, though). There's nothing on TV worth watching...it's all crap.

Answer 383

I don't care about watching television. I have an antenna (no cable). I only watch local news, national news, sports, etc.... I think that watching TV is a waste of time.

Answer 384

The deciding factor of what company to use for us was that Direct TV was the only one to offer NFL Network.

Answer 385

I'm not paying all that extra money just for a better picture when I can watch TV perfectly fine for a much lower price. If I want super duper crisp and defined images then I'll go to a movie theater,

Answer 386

I'm waiting till it fits into my budget, or until you can do the 10 channels for 10 dollars again.

Answer 387

why wouldnt u get an hdtv, they are awesome and cheap these days

Answer 388

Price. That's the number one reason. Number two, well, I am fine with what I have right now. I don't need anything more. It's TV.

Answer 389

I got HDTV because standard over the air reception is very bad in my area. Most people have cable because the reception is so bad. However, over the air HD is free, the quality is great, and no more cable bill! It paid for itself in a year.

Answer 390

Not all channels are in HD and also there isn't a big variety of the HD channels. Most of the channels which are in HD are either documentaries or movies.

Answer 391

there are free channels in most metropolitan areas that only require an antenna to get, and the quality is often better than what you get when you pay. also there is free stuff online, not HD, but decent. hulu.com is my favorite.

Answer 392

i'm not getting an HDTV until the plain old tv i have now dies of old age. we have cable so it converts. HDTV's drain too much electricity and our electric bill now is outrageous.

Answer 393

I've already two HDTV's, but the channel selection is limited. Couldn't all channels be available? Why am I limited to discovery type of shows?

Answer 394

I purchased high def because of the beautiful picture and sound (1080p). I cant even start to imagine downgrading back to a normal television. I know the prices are a bit steep but the end result makes it all worth it.

Answer 395

Main reason is the TV I have now works fine. Until it breaks, I don't see the need to get a new HD set.

Answer 396

Well, I'm thirteen and frankly, the future freaks me out. I stick with normal tvs. Not flat screen or HD or whatever. I honestly would rather not see my favorite movie stars 5 o'clock shadow or be able to see all the actors make up in a zombie movie. I don't like change and a normal tv is good enough for me. =]

Answer 397

well for starters i have a 1080p 42 inch visio and its nice. but the thing i dont like is, i pay for the hd cable box, then i pay again for the hd channel package, and i barely get 20 channels. so im just watching regular tv now on my hd until more channels are available in hd. ( oh xbox is beautiful on this thing)

Answer 398

Remember when the Playstation 3 was 750$?

Ridiculous. Same reason. Now, you have done your market research.

Answer 399

Whenever my current TV goes, I will get an HDTV; because, eventually that's all they will be making.

Answer 400

I do have an HDTV and I am very happy with it, I'm a comcast subscriber and it offers service even verizon cant beat

Answer 401

When the majority 90% of the channels support it i will go for it, but at the moment its like buying a F1 car to drive round town, pointless.

Answer 402

We already had an HD television, but needed the box or something to get the channels. Anyway, my boyfriend did it for two reasons- Football in HD, and the Discovery Channel!

Answer 403

HDTV, iva FiOS, Satellite, or Cable, would cost me several hundred dollars annually.



Television programming is boring rubbish. It is not worth paying for.



I work long hours. When I have free time, I am not going to waste it sitting on my butt in front of a television set.

Answer 404

I don't need to count the actors' pimples. My current TV has a great picture and I see no need to let the ad business tell me I need to spend money needlessly on something I don't need.

Answer 405

I'm not getting one. I think that TV will create a new excuse for me to be lazy. I have better things to do like study, exercise or be with friends. When my TV goes it goes for good.

Answer 406

I purchased an High Def TV because of the picture quality and major enhancements it does to the movies I watch and video games I play

Answer 407

Because it's very hard not to get it. I.E. you can't buy just a basic black & white TV anymore. Everything comes with so many bells & whistles (which just break easily meaning you have to buy a new one).

Personally, I don't see any difference.

Answer 408

I don't have cable or satellite. I receive my signal over the year and don't expect that to change anytime soon. Standard televisions work better with signals over the air compared to HDTV. Besides, with my eyes, I see little difference between the two.

Answer 409

My family makes a decent amount of money but cannot afford an HD TV in these economic times.

Answer 410

I have a 1080p screen and an HD-DVD/Blu-Ray player, but there is nothing worth watching on TV anymore. If they remaster the original Law and Order or Star Trek TNG into 1920x1080 then I would consider subscribing.



If I had to guess, I would say that:

1. It is too expensive for most people, especially if they can't tell the difference between 480i and 1080p (or don't care).

2. The different standards haven't been conveyed to the public well enough. Most people are probably intimidated when it comes to buying a 1080p screen. I mean, if you really don't know what pixel density, oversampling, firmware, resolution, color saturation, gray scale testing, response time, or HDCP are; or if you can't tell the difference between HDMI, DVI, or Component video... then how do you know if you are really getting a good screen. But hey, ignorance is how you really make money, amirite Verison?

Answer 411

HDTV makes everything look more realistic.



But I watch TV to _escape_ from reality. Who needs more realism??

Answer 412

I had purchased a 42" plasma HDTV. It was stolen, and I have no intention of buying another one. I live with in sight of the police station and city hall.

Answer 413

I've had HDTV since 2001. Clearer, sharper pictures.

Answer 414

Channels like CNN only have SOME coverage in HD, but not all coverage is available in HD yet. Networks need to expand their HD coverage and get more HD equipment.

Answer 415

I got hip to people who want my disposable income when the game play systems came out, there was always going to be some kind of up grade invented. While some of these inventions one just cant live with out like one's cell phone, I don't need a camera in my phone, I don't need all these other things and I don't need HD tv. I know its spectacular but what I have is good enough for me. Plus I worry about all theses things dependent on electricity. We know that our electric supplier chooses which neighborhood will get electricity and which wont depending on the crisis, even though we are all PAYING for it on a regular basis. In addition to that we see all the new condos etc going up everywhere, even in places one shouldn't put up housing and we don't see any new job hirings, or electrical plants (which are unhealthful) being built. Lastly our economy is in a slump and many many people are unemployed and don't have the disposable income let alone income.

Answer 416

the new tvs cost to much will wait a couple of years and try to buy a used tv.

Answer 417

I have cable, so I'm not overly concerned about it all.



TV is not that big a priority for me - I get all my news from the 'net.



Besides, I'm having WAY too much fun answering questions at YAHOO Answers!

Answer 418

I would like to get a 40 inch Samsung LCD TV but spending $1100.00 on it seems not logical at this point.

Answer 419

Price. I can see just fine with out HDTV.

Answer 420

I have HD on my plasma and love it. But there's not enough channels to support the price. It is expensive !! and not all my HD channels always work. :(

Answer 421

I'm not getting one yet due to price and my opinion that although they obviously look better, it is not enough better to warrant buying a new TV when all our current TVs work

Answer 422

We do not watch much television to justify even having one anyway.

As with anything, we will wait for the prices to go down, and THEN consider whether or not to get one.

If we do, it'll be just to see the weather from Scott Hetsko, the best weatherman we ever saw.

Answer 423

No I don't want one. A normal TV is better, it's cheaper. Why waist 2000$ or more for JUST A TV THAT YOU CAN WATCH LIKE A NORMAL TV? it is more clear.. but that's no point. I'll stick with my normal TV 37" that cost only around $450.00 here.

Answer 424

It's a total waste of money. Trust me on this. There is actually no improvement in the picture whatsoever.



Plus, when you're sport or something like that, since the cameras aren't made for hd, you get really bad white lines around all the players. Totally ruins the experience.

Answer 425

the biggest deterrent is cost. the HDTVs are a bit more expensive than a standard definition tv. i am well aware of the better audio and video quality, but in this case my wallet has come between me and the nicer stuff :)

Answer 426

I have the HD ready TV but I'm waiting for the HD signal to be available on free to air TV. I don't have cable or satalite and I don't want to pay for them.

Answer 427

I recognize that I probably sound like my father did when color TV came out but I really don't see the difference. The picture is a little sharper but not so much that it is worth the cost.

Answer 428

Full HD Television does not play an important factor, but gaming and Blu-Ray movies are noticeably more fluid and clear.



However, gaming devices and blu ray are still expensive, so i suppose money would be most peoples achillies heel, as a 1080p television requires a ps3, and 5.1/7.2 sound, and full hd cables.

Answer 429

The high price vs what I get in return. I already have to pay a high enough satellite bill then to get the HD channels I have to pay an extra 20 or so dollars a month. To me the price is not worth it I don't see that much of a difference to pay that much more.

Answer 430

I'm not getting an HDTV unless it simply happens to be at a better price. I'm not interested high definition commercials. I'm not driven to see the sweat on a guys brow on third and goal. While watching stations like Discover or TLC in HD would be of interest, it isn't worth hundreds to me.

Answer 431

I love HD. The color is more vivid and the picture is crisper. It's worth the money, and prices are going down now.

Answer 432

I have four channels that come up with my rabbit ears. Living in NYC, with rent, metro and electric, I could not afford any extras.

Answer 433

It just came with the TV i bought. it would be cool if you could watch any sports team you want for free all you would have to do is like type the name of the team on your remote and it goes the the game or the pregame.

Answer 434

I love how everyone says HDTVs are so expensive.



You're simply looking in the wrong area.



I bought a 22" widescreen monitor (yes, a monitor) that has an HDMI input, and displays 1080i resolution. It cost me $220, and I got it from newegg.com (the Hanns-G brand, by the way).



With the HDMI input, I am able to plug into my computer (via a DVI to HDMI converter), my Xbox 360 (for high-def gaming), and into my cable box, which has an HDMI output.



Not expensive.

Answer 435

TV is still to some extent a vast wasteland.

For all the shows on, there is very little worth watching.

Radio, as old-fashioned technology as it is, provides the news, as well as music and talk shows.

DVDs help with whatever movies a person may want to see.

Why have any tv at all?

Answer 436

Money $$$



and LCD/plasma TVs look worse than my current Sony tube TV.

Answer 437

I will get a converter box because that is better than my TV ending up in the landfill.

Answer 438

I just don't watch that much TV to make the switch affordable. If and when it becomes the industry standard AND my sets don't work, then I guess I'll have to switch.

Answer 439

Well its just the beginning of HDTV.

My family doesn't need it.

We have cable and all that good stuff.

But its just another toy.

Not worth the money in this economy.

Maybe later.

Answer 440

I'm too poor to have cable, internet, home phone, etc. That is for "rich people". I'm lucky if I can use the internet at work or a friend's house.

Answer 441

I have a life!! I'm simply not that consumed by television that I need every new gizmo that comes along. TV just isn't that important. I see what I need to see.

Answer 442

I would rather just wait from my DVD player or my Blu-Ray player. No need to spend extra for HDTV.

Answer 443

I like digital TV has the picture is sharper and the sound is more crispier, its like you are there and you can reach out to pick the flowers and the sound is more natural and sharper.has for the channels i like channels without adverts, because the adverts are stupid, the TV networks get enough money so why should we have to pay high TV licenses for rubbish and repeats.and get some descent programmes.

Answer 444

Verizon sucks! They are greedy morons! I think it's sad that Verizon has to advertise on Yahoo Answers! Advertisers should be booted off here! All this company is doing is asking survey questions here! I think its sad that they have to ask what the customers might like. Verizon just sucks! They are the a greedy company anyway! Who would sign a contract for t.v.?

Answer 445

TV has become nothing but a pathetic cesspool of rubbish.



Why would anyone want to watch 90% of the programming on there now, let alone have to fork out big bucks to watch it on some damned high definition piece of junk.

Answer 446

I don't care about HDTV or whatsover.All I want is many many nice packages that allows consumers to choose only those channels that they want to see.I don't want to have any channel that I am not interested in to watch.I am waiting for those days when they will allow us to choose our own channel and our own price to select from.

Answer 447

Price! I want a 32" HDTV (vizio), but for $500 I could spend my money on other things. Lowering prices will equal more purchases.

Answer 448

at its best its 5% better and there are additional chanels



at its worst its garbage



things to consider

1. its expensive

2. it gets worse with age

3. hardware will only work for 3 years ( codec changes)



I have decided not to purchase HDTV for ~3 years

Answer 449

I bought a 50" plasma. I can use it for video games and DVD only. I can't hook it up to my cable because almost every channel has some sort of logo or ad. I have been informed that prolonged exposure to these ads can burn the image into your screen. Plasma manufactuers are working to resolve this issue. It's probably done on purpose to force plasma owners into HD services where the ads and logos have been removed or converted into animated versions.



HD cost a lot of money. It's worth it if HDTV/DVD is your life.

Answer 450

Most of the stations contain junk. Many of the hours, I have trouble finding one show to watch. When I do, the show is not all that entertaining. I like true crime, but those shows are all repeats too.

Answer 451

price and not enough HDTV channels.

Answer 452

I switched to verizon for 1 month and switched back to cable because my bill was to high.Why pay for same service at a higher price ??

Answer 453

For the same reason that I'm not jumping on the Blu-ray wagon...either DVD or VHS is quality enough, affordable enough, and that's enough.

Answer 454

TV is crap. What isn't a brain dead reality-TV is another re-run I've already seen twice. A high definition picture isn't going to improve anything.

Answer 455

I'm 17 and I got it in my room, In fact its what my computer is hooked up to!! There good, novelty wears off after a while though

Answer 456

I have one because it is big and good looking (42"). Also, everyone is getting one these days and its the way to be a part of all this.



-It makes a great TV for movie nights.

- Its easier to play Wii on it.



**Its much LESS bulkier and takes up less space and its easy to move compared to fat TV's.

Answer 457

Not waiting for channels,only waiting to win the lotto so I can afford it.

Answer 458

I personally don't have it but my neighbor (also a close friend) has it and whenever I go to her house and watch TV, I am always amazed and commenting on how CLEAR and real everything looks. I love HDTV.



I could not focus on the actual TV show because of how clear it was!!!

Answer 459

I have a digital up-converting receiver which is also my dvd and surround sound, that combined with my Digital Satellite gives me a near HD picture with out any extra service fees or other receivers. Plus if I get HD I lose my TiVo and no DVR is as good as TiVo, with it's perks. NONE!!!!!

Answer 460

Price - costs do not exceed the benefits. We're in a recession. I just lost my job. Got a working TV already.

Answer 461

I think its useless and too expensive! I have cable, so when cable says I have to get an HDTV because their signal is not going to work...then ill consider it...or I can just turn to my computer for it.

Answer 462

I don't really have an interest in HDTV. TV is just TV... I don't care how "High Def" it looks. It's expensive, encourages us to watch more TV than we should, and just isn't worth it unless you can afford it. Don't get me wrong, I think it's cool... but I won't get it until I KNOW I can afford it without a problem.

Answer 463

I'd love to get it, I have satellite tv and you have to pay per box already. To add hd is $11 a box more a month and I can't afford it. Maybe if the price goes down.

Answer 464

We just bought a new TV and it happened to have HD, so we got it as a bonus (we didn't really care if we had it or not). Also, I don't really like HD because you can't tape the show unless you leave the TV on the whole time or buy a HD recorder. It's REALLY annoying!

Answer 465

We don't have the money to but a new tv. Plus it doesn't make the shows better.



If is was all cheap, then I think we would all try it.

Answer 466

We do not have TV.

No broadcast TV.

No Cable.



We have a TV, an old VCR and a DVD player. That's it. Only movies and only sometimes.

Answer 467

My existing TVs work fine. I'll use them until they wear out which maybe another 10 years or so.

Answer 468

my opinion is that you will always get your money worth, if you enjoy the entertainment, television have on today , many of the channels have provided teen interest shows and cute kiddie programs our very educational. , and the adult channels are sometimes to visionary base on too many topics , like gay shows , triple XXX rated shows, guns , blood and the whole bit . what ever happen to shows like I want to be like her or him when I grow -up shows ? But the news stations are A-1.

Answer 469

Only one reason - I have no idea what HDTV is - does that make me sad, or am I one of the few sensible people left on the planet?

Answer 470

HDTV is simply a waste of time and money, IMO.



I can see clearly on my television. It's used JUST for television...so why do I need to upgrade my service and my television?



But, I don't waste hours sitting in front of the tv, either.

Answer 471

Its a better picture with no lines going down the screen.

Answer 472

first of all the price for TV and the other expenses attached to it.

secondly i'm a student and i need to graduate with the GPA of 3.5 and above not just graduate with 2.5 GPA. so i need to spend more time on my studies. i live on a tight budget, so i can't afford the HDTV.

even if i am not a student and i have enough money to spend on i will not buy the HD TV caz, i can save money.

Answer 473

Costs too much money. That's the only thing that affects my decision.

Answer 474

I just don't see the point in it. I get a clear picture as it is and the price isn't worth the difference in picture.

Answer 475

i have an HD but i don't get HD channels because the HD package is too expensive...satellite people should charge nothing for them...i'll even pay for the equipment...

Answer 476

None of the new TV's fit my very expensive entertainment center

Answer 477

The television I have now is fine. I'll buy an HD television when my TV breaks. But I'll only buy it if it's cheap. I don't mind my television now.

Answer 478

Price of HDTV is outrageous.

Answer 479

i have an LCDTV and i like it. the only reason that i have one is because my other tv was going out and at the time something came up that allowed me to purchase the tv otherwise i would not have gotten one.

Answer 480

The price and not needing a new TV

Answer 481

Not getting it. I have a perfectly good RCA square TV and the reception and picture are flawless. I use satelliteTV.

Answer 482

With all the things I have to spend money on, I don't have any money to spend on HDTV.

Answer 483

I don't watch tv that much. And when I do it's usually at friend's houses, on their HDTVs!

Answer 484

Well I think when we talk of HDTV we talk about something else than ordinary tv. HDTV is the latest technology and the quality of image and sound are completely different. With HDTV you live the action whether it is a good movie or an interesting topic. Yes, it is expensive since it is still new but it is really worth the investment and I am very satisfied.

Answer 485

I don't notice the difference unless it's being shown side by side at the TV store, so why bother? Basically, don't care. Would you buy $50 wine if it tasted the same as $7 wine to you?

Answer 486

The quality of programming on tv now does not make me want to spend $$$$ to get a better picture.

Answer 487

I am not getting HDTV until I can afford it. Plus the HDTV's are too expensive themselves.

Answer 488

I simply don't care about it. The tv I have does the job just fine and there is much more to life than television!

Answer 489

It is currently WAY too expensive. I don't mean too expensive to where you can bring down the price a little and it'll be ok. I mean too expensive as in I'm waiting quite a few years until standard def. is so obsolete it's hard to deal with and HD is standard and very affordable.

Answer 490

Yes I happy to have a HDTV for the ABC 2 Paralympic games and other sport.



I am female and very glad to enjoy a HDTV. I as well as sport I like animal documentaries.

Answer 491

holy **** a lot of people answered this question anyways i have HDTV and will never go back to s**ty tv again

Answer 492

there are a couple of reason why i have a HDTV



blu-ray looks wonderful

i need a Wall mount Tv and only HDTV's are wall mountable

Answer 493

i don't have one but i want one. but there too expensive. if you want a great tv that's big, has 1080p, and 120 hz you will be spending a truck load of money. but i think there great, but making them more affordable would be the main source of my complaints about them

Answer 494

The reason i have for getting a hdtv is that the picture is clearer.

Answer 495

I have HD, but am dissapointed that the technology available is 20+ years old, and still costly..

Answer 496

I don't see a need for it. I'm perfectly happy with what I see now anyway. There is so much crap on. Why pay more to watch or not watch the same crap, just with a clearer picture?

Answer 497

I too had no intention of converting until my TV died. Ironically my TV died last year. This surprised me because I didn't think TVs died anymore, but they do.



Anyway, I now have HD and almost never watch any channel except HD. There is just no comparison.

Answer 498

too expensive for me, since we would have to get a new tv and pay more every month for a few more channels



Besides, i can hardly tell the difference anyway!

Answer 499

hi

Answer 500

Who cares how 'clear' it looks? its just TV., i havent even turned a TV on in months anyways, its a big waste of time and time is money, and HD TV's are a LOT of money.

Answer 501

13-inch televisions dont support hdtv well

Answer 502

We got it last year for the better picture, and all the HD choices we have with Comcast.

Answer 503

The price of the new ones and my old set 15 y.o. works just fine!

Answer 504

MONEY!



I've still got to buy an HDTV and then I have to pay MORE for HDTV access than I do now for standard.

Answer 505

I would love to get a HDTV, but in the area i live in they are too expensive.

Answer 506

Initial reason was for gaming, but hope to get HD television service if and when rates drop.

Answer 507

I have HDTV and am very happy with it. The pic is much clearer then standard tv screen

Answer 508

I'm waiting until OLED TVs get bigger and cheaper, which won't be too long with the way technology moves forward so quickly.

Answer 509

After Feb, 09 our old Tv wont work (w/o a converter), so in buying a digital TV, may as well get an LCD HDTV, when by then all channels will broadcast only HD. SO there is NO reason for not getting one.

Answer 510

HD does not make a difference on the ancient TVs I own, and I'm not upgrading til I get a TV on which it actually matters.

Answer 511

if your old remote control runs out of battery, it's time to buy an HDTV.

Answer 512

The overall cost is what will keep me in the digital dark ages.

Answer 513

may have no choice than to get an HD tv FIOS turned the regular TV off today ....i thought I had til December!!

Answer 514

Don't watch much tv as it is, so I don't see the point. I don't buy new things simply for the sake of buying. That's stupid and wasteful.

Answer 515

Simple: Spend more for tv service or put more away for retirement.



HDTV is cool but it's a luxury.

Answer 516

I'll tell you what Verizon, send me a HD TV for free and ill tell you why i would or would not want to get one. Email is



[e-mail]

Answer 517

I have HDTV, but it isnt from verizion, and i wish that more channels would switch.

Answer 518

Price would be the main reason many people don't get one.



I enjoy mine very much though. I bought mine used and love it. It's like reverting back to dial up Internet once you tasted high speed broad band. It's hard to go back.

Answer 519

It all comes down to pricing and affordability. Once the market is saturated with them and they are no longer regularly stolen, then i will get one. Until then I am content to play the waiting game for the prices to come right down, they always eventually do. Hey but if you want one now and have the money spare, then good luck to you and enjoy it.

Answer 520

I have a HDTV. It is 42 inch. I was surprise to see the view. The colors were just fantastic. Now I am going to buy the same tv, sony, but unimaginably big. I am going to get a 101inch tv wasting money is the disadvantage but look on the bright side....

Answer 521

well honestly, HDTV is nice but it's sooo expensive. i already bought LG and it look nice and i got 44 inches.

Answer 522

I don't watch TV at all. It would be stupid for me to get a high tech model of something I won't use anyways.

Answer 523

I have one, I love it, but, It is pricey and I wish the HD channels didn't cost more. :(

I would like to get another HDTV but they are so expensive, since when does verizon have them?

Answer 524

I do have, and I will always have HDTV. I love the quality; especially when I play video games.

Answer 525

Well I'm waiting patiently for YOU Verizon to come to my area with FIOStv!



Maybe then I can get in on one of those deals for a FREE HDTV that you were giving out to those who got your service! Please hurry up and bring FIOSTV TO THE BRONX NY!

Answer 526

I do have HD TV becasue there is nothing like watching football on HD. I mean there is no comparison. It also helps that Basic cable is included in my HOA dues. That is a win win siuation.

Answer 527

reason for getting:

- you can enjoy your PS3 and Satellite's in HD thanks to the connexion HDMI or other, and of course you will enjoy it more that any tv while watching without a satellite



reason for not getting:

-it is too expensive and sometimes u don't find a place to put it and to enjoy the TV you should have a 1080p

Answer 528

For:

Able to receive the 'HD' variant of free-to-air channels.

The use of gaming consoles (XBOX 360 and PS3)

Design



Against:

PRICE! PRICE! PRICE!

Nothing that is a major improvement over regular TV's

Can be hard to position in some rooms (space)

Answer 529

If you are talking about HDTV LCD or Plasma then the reason I got one is the picture is so much clearer plus it will save me on Electric bills compare with the same size CRT TV.

Answer 530

will not get a HD TV



don't really watch TV . maybe jeopardy one or twice a week.

I get my news from the internet or from collegues, friends

Answer 531

I just got it last week and it is AMAZING!!!!!!!! The picture is better, more clear, and even more crisp! You can see every little thing you couldn't! We watched a movie, and you could see every strand of grass!

Answer 532

Price is a major reason. Otherwise I would buy another for my upstairs bedroom.

Answer 533

Too high of price



Why have HD when the quality of the shows are so "low" definition?



The reality show experience isn't improved by seeing stupid people better.

Answer 534

I don't have to get one because yesterday I was given one on my 60th birthday (Labor Day) by my children and their families.



Since I'm electronically challenged my daughter did all the research and knowing my preferences she made the selection.

Answer 535

it's clear, but i don't care so much about the difference in what i have now, and how much better it can get.



plus, i really don't like seeing ray liotta's or edward james olmos's craters on my screen. paying extra for those channels doesn't mean much to me.

i like to think actors have flawless skin, cause their bad skin just breaks my concentration!

Answer 536

Definitely the PRICE! Not only do you have to buy a certain expensive TV, but you also need to upgrade your current television package, which is also expensive. Can't afford it and probably never will.

Answer 537

i don't see the point of HD. all it is, basically, is improved colour and a slightly better picture. too be honest i can't be bothered with it until my T.V actually breaks and then i will buy one. also has anyone ever compared a regular t.v with a HD on because i would aslo like to see what all the fuss is about and how brilliant it really is. because i bet it isn't

Answer 538

Easy one this. Reasons for not getting HDTV? I don't watch television.

Answer 539

We have one so that we can get better reception. They are expensive, but it's better than having extra boxes laying about the house.

Answer 540

I am waiting for it to get a lot cheaper before I buy one.

Answer 541

I DEFINETLY WOULD NOT GET VERISON HDTV, BUT THERE ARE OTHER AND BETTER/CHEAPER HDTV PROGRAMMING SERVICES.....



SUCH AS THESE ONES





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FsXr1MRrFOg







http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FsXr1MRrFOghttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FsXr1MRrFOghttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FsXr1MRrFOghttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FsXr1MRrFOg







http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FsXr1MRrFOg





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FsXr1MRrFOg







http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FsXr1MRrFOg











http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FsXr1MRrFOg









http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FsXr1MRrFOg

Answer 542

What will make me not get it is the price. First, I would have to buy new TVs.

Answer 543

Price is a big factor for me. It's too expensive right now.

Answer 544

With gas prices and everything, people need more of their money now for necessities, instead of wants. If there isn't a HUGE HUGE HUGE HUGE difference, I wouldn't spend the extra money on HD. We'll see.

Answer 545

The quality of the picture that I receive is fine for me. It wouldn't make a difference if it was better or not.



Oh, and the price.

Answer 546

I got HDTV because my husband said it was the best thing to get and i still cant tell the picture difference

Answer 547

I watched my first BlueRay movie the other day. I was so blown away that I had to convert a room in my basement into a home theater. The cost to do so was not much however the end result was my own mini movie cinema. Awesome is all I have to say.

Answer 548

I don't watch enough TV to make the price worth it. They are way too expensive. When the price comes down, I'll consider it.

Answer 549

Im only 15 and the reason that i bought a HDTV was for better gaming, bigger screen size, more enjoyable, and to watch regular tv channels in a big tv. But the main reason was for gaming. I use to have a 51cm Tevion standard tv, i had fun with it, but i just wanted a bigger and better tv to enjoy watching tv more and to enjoy playing more. and i bought a

AWA 32" (81cm) LCD HDTV. Its only a start you know...when i be older...say about 21 or something ill buy like a 52" samsung or sony or wateva...

Answer 550

well i wont be getting hd tv till it is more affordable im not rich nor is any one i know and hd tv is just not some thing that we have to have to survive so until it is forced into the game like digital now is then im not upgrading

Answer 551

i would get a hdtv as you would get more channels

Answer 552

The economy, can't afford my utility bills, no way I can buy a new TV.

Answer 553

I only have local channels, no cable/satellite.... I plan to keep it that way too, guess I just have to buy one of those stupid converter boxes now, ugh. But it comes down to price mostly

Answer 554

I just don't need a sharper picture. It's not that important to me. If I wanted to spend money on TV, I would get TiVo.

Answer 555

the price of televisions now is unreal. those moronic coupons shouldve been for more and for a television. of course its all a marketing ploy. a brand new television looks exactly as good as one of these overpriced rip offs. the government gets on gas stations for price gouging they should do the same for these overpriced televisions

Answer 556

I have a 50 inch HDTV and love it. The reasons why I got it is because it works brilliantly with my son's and my video games on our XBOX 360 and PS3. We also love watching TV on such a large size without looking extremely pixellated with HD channels. We can notice tiny details we never noticed before

Answer 557

Almost entirely price. I bought mine on sale two years ago, and haven't regretted it. Had it been any pricier, I would have passed.

Answer 558

HD gaming and HD movies.



Price will be effecting my decision

Answer 559

well my old tv broke so we had to get a new one plus me and my parents thought wow imagine that everyday and man its great to see it

mine is a vizio

Answer 560

I barely watch TV.

When I can take college courses at M.I.T. and STANFORD and CARNEGIE-MELLON and the University of Toronto, then I probably will get it.

Answer 561

who cares, we've been watching normal TVs for 50 years what has changed that we would need a clearer tv, its not like were going to miss that key moment in reality tv that would change our lives if we only had it in HD.

Answer 562

I don't watch enough TV for the difference (which isn't all that noticeable) to be worth the price.

Answer 563

How about burnout? Some people say the flat screen tvs might not last as long! That's something to think about.

Answer 564

I have HDTV and love it, the only downside is not all the channels are in HD.

Answer 565

One reason, is that if mine breaks, I'm not gonna waste a hellofalot of money just to replace it.

Answer 566

Picture quality and content

Answer 567

i love my hdtv, but there's still nothing on worth watching!

Answer 568

Quality

Answer 569

MONEY.



My tv still works and I can't afford to buy a new one just because it's bigger and better. And there's no reason to pay extra for HiDef service since I can't see the difference.

Answer 570

I'm not willing to pay the extra money just so the picture is a little bit better.

Answer 571

when my old tv breaks down will buy the best one for the price could care less if its hd-basic cable-tv is such a rip off anymore

Answer 572

HDTV isn't needed...by me...

i have perfectly good tvs that i use

Answer 573

no the channels are great it is just to expensive more than double what i pay now

i cant afford it

Answer 574

Wowie....800 answers!

Answer 575

The televisions are still ridiculously expensive.

Answer 576

THeres nothing good on british tv

Answer 577

I dont want to encourage myself to watch more tv plain and simple! It's expensive and I don't want to invest the little money I have in the box!

Answer 578

Because TVs will be obsolete in the not too distant future

Answer 579

I have a house full of functioning non-HD TVs. I can't justify spending $K's to upgrade my televisions.

Answer 580

It doesnt make the program better. TV will still be TV, satelite imaging and pixels to form the image. Regular TV good enough. :D

Answer 581

Reason for getting it... (actually have it)

For playing games in HD, and watching movies



Things i Don't Do with my HDTV...

Seeing Regular Tv., Or cable or any of that ****, thous cable is expensive, and don't have enough to pay cable. I don't have much time for watching tv (and a don't really enjoy it) i rather games and pc

Answer 582

I have 2 tube tvs that both work perfectly well, I see absolutely no reason at all to take 2 television sets that work just fine, throw them in a landfill somewhere, to buy 2 overpriced tvs that the technology will be obsolete within a few years. Since what I've already got is considered obsolete, I'll just wait until they quit working.



And, I honestly don't see that big of a difference between "regular" tv and high def.

Answer 583

its still too new. not all tvs and not all channels are in HD, so the price you pay for the few channels you see a difference in is not worth it.

Answer 584

PRICE!!!!!!!!!!!!!! the economy is really bad and u should get alot more channels y not spanish channels.... o ya and a question.. y dont u guys get the iPhone for your plan?????????????

Answer 585

http://www.prizerebel.com/index.php?r=528204

sign up completely legit 2 days in and already got 1600 xboxlive pts

Answer 586

my tv was broken and I needed to buy a new one so I bought a hd tv

Answer 587

None, as long as commercials rule Television I won't watch it, period!

Doesn't matter if I can forwind or not!

Answer 588

As most consumers.....Price. Everyone wants the best. It's just a matter of what is affordable.

Answer 589

The picture is better with HD... but the quality of the majority of the TV shows is very low... and better picture is not going to improve it...

Answer 590

There are some channels that are not HD. Which kills the whole HD idea. HD programming, for cable and satellite providers, is not cheap.

Answer 591

I might not get one because I really feel like I have no use for one but you might never know...I might end up buying one

Answer 592

Waiting for them to be affordable - say under $250.

Answer 593

To expensive

Answer 594

u tell me,



the economy is not searching for a HDTV right now. '

ONE DAY I WILL THOUGH SO KEEP THAT THOUGHT IN MIND!!!

Answer 595

Too much money - two many choices and no clear values

Answer 596

ok i know everyone worried about price but to be honest, high definition is amazing for things like football and sports. but really isnt that great for anything but sports i believe. i have it but i watch sports all day.

Answer 597

Cost coupled with rapid advances making this year's model obsolete in less than a year.

Answer 598

Why should I when I have cable?

Companies are spending millions of dollars on advertising to scare people out of their socks over it.

It makes me sick.

Answer 599

whats the point????



well for me, im not saying that HD Tv isn't clearer than than normal tv and it does have better sound and all!

But y do we really need it! its not gonna like get us happier or pay less money you will actually pay more!

Me i tell my dad not to get it CuZ tv is tv wheather its clearer or not i can STILL SEE Tv even tho its not HD and al that loud sound! i dont need it! no use for it!

Answer 600

I'm not unhappy with the quality of the current NTSC image, so it makes no sense financially to replace my current analog TV until it fails.

Answer 601

I can't even afford the necessities of life right now. I certainly can't afford luxuries like new TVs.

Answer 602

For me personally, I haven't gotten HDTV for the simple fact that, I already have a set top box, and I thought that would enable me to have HDTV when the time arrived, however - it's only standard, so I now have to go and buy a brand new set top box, and it's not on my agenda currently. But it would be nice to see how the HDTV looks. lol

Answer 603

you would get almost the same experience for a couple hundred dollars more. its the same with blu-ray, which more expensive for the same thing.

Answer 604

Not enough, channels!!!



I have cable HD and it has like 20 channels in HD?



I need more.............. in cable

Answer 605

Price is not worth the gain.

Answer 606

I use my 32 inch for lots of movies and gaming, so HD is allot better for me. Im actually using it as my monitor right now wich is saweet!

Answer 607

Lol i have a 26" in my bedroom, they are much better than non HD tv's couse they take up less space, look amazing and have a clear, clean picture.

Answer 608

There is nothing wrong with the TV I have now.

Answer 609

1. It costs too much.

2. I'd rather spend money on my computer than TV.

Answer 610

I don't watch much TV, my old TV works fine and I have better things to spend money on.

Answer 611

I have HDTV clearer

Answer 612

not sure if that type of tv gives you more channels



but most people get them for better graphic

Answer 613

The price.

Answer 614

i have an hdtv because my boyfriend is a sports fanatic so its basically just because he likes to watch the games in a clearer view

Answer 615

well they do look good like other people said but its not cheap. i rather save for fuel then a tv.

besides HDTV are pretty expensive and not good for the environment

Answer 616

It would be very nice to have a sharper, nicer image on the screen, but it depends on the money.

I know I might be able to get it because of the price factor.

But if my TV broke, then I would for sure get it. xD

Hopefully I can just live with normal TV...

Even though HD is awesome...



^_~

Answer 617

I got HD, and WOW it is awesome. 52" of pure bliss in the living room, and doubles for my computer.

Answer 618

For getting one:The picture is clear.

For not getting one:Too expensive.

Answer 619

Cost.

Answer 620

I don't see a difference on my tv so why spend the money.It's a lot of hype don't waste your $$$

Answer 621

Life is too short and nothing will stop me in enjoying the new technology. But for those cheap bastard they can bring their money to their grave.

Answer 622

i am set up for hdtv, but the price is stopping me!

Answer 623

Way too expensive. And the tv programming seems to be getting worse and worse.

Answer 624

The reason for not getting is they are to expensive and I televisions already.

Answer 625

Not really a good reason yet,



i got a big screen plasma tv because they save space and the graphics are awesome.

Answer 626

Too expensive.

Answer 627

Our kids each have tv's in they're bedrooms, and the ones they had was pretty old, some of the buttons pushed into the tv itsself and the remotes were broken, they were ready for new ones. We bought them new ones and they each got HD's, which were no more expensive then the others actually. They love them.

Answer 628

Who the hell can afford HDTV when they are paying outrageous prices for Verizon phone and internet services?

Answer 629

i buyed a 32 inch vizio tv for 600 bucks its a really nice tv an i love the sound an the pic is awsome

Answer 630

I have high definition TV, and I love it. My main TV is a 57" back projector and was sold to me as 'HD ready' in 2003 when I got it. Thankfully it was, and goes as high as 1080i.



The television shows look amazing. I just got a Bluray player (Sony PS3) to watch HD movies. And now I only use DVR to record HD movies where possible, because watching them in low definition is just nowhere near as good by comparison.



HD is something all Americans need to think about if they like TV. As a nation we jumped on the color TV bandwagon and got NTSC, while Europe waited and got the sharper crisper superior PAL format.



But HD erases this mistake with superior image and sound quality. I only wish everything was in HD! Once you've experienced HD and DVR, you won't want to go back. It's like listening to music in stereo and then being asked to go back to mono. You just don't want to do it.

Answer 631

reasons to get, its clearer and more theatrical effect.



reason not to get, expensive.. wait till the price drops and eventually get it.

Answer 632

its cool seeing scary movies cause...man u just got to get it...same as sports makes everything clear u can see everything....better

idk its hard to explain

Answer 633

HD has so much better quality and picture

Answer 634

I know I won't bet getting it anytime soon....Why? Because I live in South America....we still use Air signals...Heck...We still use smoke signals!... There are some people we have the facilities....but the majority don't...

Answer 635

The main factor is the price

Answer 636

I got mine for my PS3 because it makes it so much more pro also I got it for football games and other sport games

Answer 637

The price.



If I was to get HDTV it would be 1080p

Answer 638

Money

Answer 639

its to expensive. just for a clearer screen. lower the price.

Answer 640

well my tv broke, and i needed a new one, and i had the money spare to buy one so i did



and you dont half look brilliant do they

Answer 641

Cost, almost entirely. Our TV is set up to accept it, and I'm sure it'd be nice, but the cost is appalling.

Answer 642

Why bother? I have Direct TV and really don't watch that much anyway.

Answer 643

$$$$$$ I can think of more important things to spend what little money I have on.

Answer 644

i agree with the second answer, the HD tv cost too much and then after you buy the damn tv you gotta buy the HD package, its just a hassle and costs too much. any tv is fine for me, and i feel lucky to have my basic cable...

Answer 645

If you play games or watch movies on it, it looks great! You don't really notice it with normal shows (cartoons, news ect.)

Answer 646

I am too poor and nothings wrong with the way tv use to be! I will just get vhs/dvds and do with out tv!

Answer 647

Wow! Four weeks to ANSWER! It won't take me THAT long!!!



TOO expensive!



Tooo expensive!



I can SEE, if I want to WATCH, what is going on, without having to SEE the number of THREADS in the weave of a suit! Nor do I need to count the number of blades of grass in a lawn! I can still SEE whether or not it's GREEN, or sun-baked, and turning brown!



I don't WANT, or NEED, to PAY MORE for THAT!!!



If I can see the steam coming off a fresh cow-pie, that's CLOSE-ENOUGH for me! I don't need to see the FLIES flocking to it!



If I want to WATCH in DEPTH, I can go to the MOVIES! Or, better yet... go out in the back yard, and SEE REAL leaves, on trees... REAL blades of GRASS... And SMELL the fresh-cut lawn, when I MOW it!



If I have to PAY for THAT kind of entertainment, I would rather READ a BOOK, and let my MIND fill-in what I can't SEE--- and FEEL...



And, I don't have to PAY for THAT! And, I can do it at my own pace... and ENJOY it!



Sorry... I'm not THAT hooked on TV!



Good Luck to those of you who ARE!!!

Answer 648

I want the Japan Channel - TV Tokyo, which is impossible to get in California, then I will get it.

Answer 649

I got a 50" Sony Wega from my work since I can purchase at cost and am SO glad I did. The picture from HDTV to SDTV is night and day, such clear visuals, plus with the latest technology in video games and Blue Ray DVD's makes it just that much more worth it. If you are debating on getting HDTV, I would do it, but shop around on prices first a lot of times you can get it on sale near holidays for cheap.

Answer 650

My housemates and I decided on getting Sky HD due to a recent drop in price and it is spectacular.



We enjoy the quality of the HD transmissions - suits the large TV and the Football (soccer) looks spectacular... Worth the dough, especially as ths Sky HD box is a 160GB PVR too and the scheduling is spot on as are the functions.

Answer 651

I have it cause of my xbox 360 and my Ps3. those are really great! also i have DirecTV which is ok. i use verizon for my internet so i cant really hate on you guys.

Answer 652

the price and by the time I was to get all that they would come out with something better

Answer 653

if half the population is men...the other half of the population "females' dont care as much about HDTV. its more about listening than seeing every dang detail.

Answer 654

My main reason is because I don't need one. I work at a home theater place and my discount would be substantial on most televisions, but at this point all the TV's in my house work fine.

Even with my discount, price is still a factor but only secondary to the fact that I don't necessarily need an HDTV yet.

Answer 655

Plain and simple: the expense.

Answer 656

becuase i dont have any money left.

We already have a LCD HD and MY SKY HD so no more money for more stuff

Answer 657

My vision isn't perfect, so what doe's it matter what it looks like. Money

Answer 658

I have two TVs that are still working fine - no reason to upgrade ♥

Answer 659

big factor is cost. i have children. the extra money you spend in the tv plus the special packages you have to buy can be applied to their college fund. i'm not missing anything by not having it!

Answer 660

I won't get one because the equipment and programming is far too expensive!! :(

Answer 661

Today someone told me a joke, and SOBE came out my nose!

Answer 662

Why do we have to pay for that to be pushed off on us? So the govt.(FCC)can sell more bandwidth to the highest corporate bidder? I bought a house so that I didn't have to pay rent anymore! ;-(=

Answer 663

price. after you spend $800+ on a tv you shouldn't have to pay a monthly fee.

Answer 664

Well, I won't get one if Verizon is the "service" provider.

Answer 665

Too expensive. I rather get two converter box with the coupon!

Answer 666

Too expensive for me at the moment.

Answer 667

I am not getting it I hardly watch tv so why pay more for something I seldom use?

Answer 668

Please, get a life, what is the carbon emissions on a flat wall set to the cathode rays? Really, trendy ah? At any cost what about the flippin environment what kinda custodianship do you leave for children in living colour and graphic clarity other than a democratic dictatorship of being told what and how to vote so long as working families loose their home to pay for a flat screen tv up against the wall in a designer apartment they cant afford nor afford to not have, well could luck the blessing is cursing the environment we leave kids? Prove to me a flat screen TV is healthier and I will get one, in the mean time couch potatoe I am walking I have better things to do.

Answer 669

Our biggest TV doesn't even support HD : (



MAYBE if we ever get a HD TV ya.



Also yeah!! what the dude bellow me said! Make the Japanese channel free damn it =(

Answer 670

OMG!!!! The pictures are so cool. Very detailed, crisp, color is great, and so on. We have one and I love it.

Answer 671

The $$$ factor.

Answer 672

I'm considering about it, it's a little expensive.

Answer 673

What are you planning to sell all the "morons" next?

Answer 674

I like my cable bill as small as possible.

Answer 675

i heard hgtvs have a gas in them that are very bad for the environment! i hope they arent toxic to people tho!

Answer 676

until the 'reality' garbage is finaly buried in a long over due grave, i refuse to watch TV in general let alone stupidity in high def...

Answer 677

Are we getting paid to contribute to your market research?

Answer 678

i have an HDTV sony bravia

Answer 679

Whether you can actually get it in your area once you have bought the fancy TV.

Answer 680

The price!

Answer 681

I get most of my entertainment from websites like http://www.bofads.com so I don't need high def...yet.

Answer 682

Verizon, I agree with prekinpd.

Answer 683

I have a tv that works just fine.

Answer 684

my flat screen sony works,when it breaks i will buy a HDTV.

i am not a latest fad tool like some peoples

Answer 685

too expensive! If it could be offered at a lower price I would want it for sure!

Answer 686

there are no good shows on TV

Answer 687

i got an HDTV for my PS3

Answer 688

TV is a WMD

that is a weapon of mass deception!



OFF

YOUR

TV!

Answer 689

Nope when im borde i watch anything thats on.

Answer 690

dont want it or need it. Tv is not my life, my wife and children are my family and would rather watch them

Answer 691

why bother paying extra for clarity they should offer that standard

Answer 692

Because I won't have a choice, it's all a big scam by the HDTV makers to force people to get HD TV and their signal.

Answer 693

costs a fortune

Answer 694

HOCKEY HOCKEY HOCKEY HOCKEY! I love sports and Hockey ALONE is worth the HDTV purchase!

Answer 695

I have no money.



Thats my main reason for not getting one

Answer 696

Currently we do not have an HD tv. When our living room set goes, we will get one...won't have much choice, the other type are severly limited!!



The reasons not to get one now:



1) current set still good.



2) don't really care about HD picture; i am satisfied with current picture



3) my mom has one and you have to constantly change the channels and settings to get the HD feature. She does not even bother!!!



4) price is to high right now.



we're fine with what we have and will only change when it is necessary.

Answer 697

Definitely cost. I already pay too much for the cable service I get now which just recently cut the channels offered and raised the price of their service. And you want me to pay more for something that doesn't look that much different then I get now? In this day and age when I can barely afford the gas to go to my teaching job that just cut my pay due to budget cuts.....get real

Answer 698

So ahh have fun reading all these

Answer 699

DO NOT FALL FOR VERIZON!!!!!!!! THEY PROMISE LOW RATES, BUT THEY RAISE THEM WITH A BUNCH OF HIDDEN FEES AFTER A FEW MONTHS!!!!!!!!! STICK WITH CABLE!!!!!!!!!

Answer 700

The only thing I can say is that MONEY, you know fundage, dead presidents, etc.....

Answer 701

When you're paying that much, it seems unneccesary and unethical.

Answer 702

It is just a waste of money.

Answer 703

The prices are astronomical

Answer 704

HD is great. Especially on the PS3

Answer 705

I believe the airwaves should be free.

I refuse to pay to watch junk on tv.

Answer 706

My reason for getting my HDTV was because of my Playstation 3



edit: why the thumbs down? am i allowed to buy HDTV for my Ps3??

Answer 707

Soooooooooooo expensive. Personally, I do not watch that much TV. It isn't worth it to make a large investment in something that I will hardly ever use. I can afford it, but why would I want to waste my money? There are so many other ways to use my money to keep me entertained as well as in shape (both physically and mentally.)

Answer 708

pictures are sometimes disoriented and there are sometimes there are many squares across the screen.

Answer 709

Wayyyy too expensive, I'm sticking with my 42-inch LCD thank-you-very-much.

Answer 710

I already have HDTV, or my roomie does, and I loove it. It makes everything better. I would like to see all the sports networks get it, especially the racing ones. It would add to the racing, and we'd get to see Jeremy Rose even better.

Answer 711

I have digital and hd

Answer 712

well first of all i cannot afford it but if you would be so gracious as to send me one i would very much appreciate it :)

Answer 713

Once you've had HD you won't want to watch TV any other way.

Answer 714

TV is no longer entertaining.

Answer 715

Cost!

Answer 716

Cost!

Answer 717

Lack of security in my house ...theft magnet

threat of nuclear war. ...nukes are hard on electronics

Answer 718

too expensive. my tv now works just fine!!

Answer 719

It's not worth it - the quality is not worth the hassle.

Answer 720

$$$$$$, It is a want not a need and I need to make my wife happy.

Answer 721

i have HD because its much clearer than regular ones.



i love my HDTV :)

Answer 722

I don't watch television

Answer 723

I watch too much TV. I don't need another excuse to watch more.

Answer 724

some good channels are not inHD

Answer 725

economy is so down, dont have money for new tvs

Answer 726

MOney talks and the other stuff walks.

Answer 727

I just have basic cable, to save money.

Answer 728

I have DirecTV with the HD channels, but I am waiting for Verizon FiOS to be available in my area!! What's taking so long Verizon? :) (Located in Bay Area!)

Answer 729

The main reason- COST!



I'm sorry if that sounds like I'm a cheap skate, but cost is a huge concern right now. Considering the strain that the recent economy has on all of us, I just don't see the need to pay that much money for something that we truly do not need.



I don't "need" a flat screen TV, I don't "need" surround sound, I don't "need" HDTV.



I'd rather save that kind of money for a rainy day. Vacations with my family, groceries, and of course...GASOLINE!



HDTV is not a priority. It's a luxury not a necessity.

Answer 730

I don't need to watch the news in HD. The 'HD' channels are often compressed, which makes it not so great. Why pay 70 bucks a month for hundreds of channles you never watch? If I ever got an HD TV, it would be hooked up to my computer, which has a blu-ray player, and better graphics than an xbox 360. Maybe if I could pick and choose the channels I wanted, and have the price based on how many channels I pick. That, combined with reasonably priced on demand options and the ability to use them on my computer's digital tuner might help me along a bit.



There's also this great thing called the internet, where many networks like to put some of my favorite shows! I think to many people, hulu doesn't seem like much of a threat now, but it will grow in popularity. Once you can compete with its cost, rare and short ads, ease of and widespread use, then you'll have a shot. Advertising has become ridiculous on mainstream tv. I'm happy to watch hulu's 30 second ads every 15 minutes. They've even got FREE HD! As long as there are free alternatives to your service, people will use them.

Answer 731

Well, I don't know, actually. We just kinda GOT HDTV...

Answer 732

No money. This is a brutal economy.

Answer 733

I have had an HDTV for almost 5 years now. I never regretted getting it and are content with HD. Cost? Well, that's not a problem for me.



HD is getting cheaper and cheaper, and in the future, will have replaced SDTV. Those who stick with SDTV instead of HDTV with an excuse other than cost are technologically backwards. :-)

Answer 734

you can get hd on your tv that has no cable.

Answer 735

expensive

half of the channels dont even work

Answer 736

Too expensive, and it's just not worth it's "weight in gold".

Answer 737

It's expensive,plain and simple.

Answer 738

I don't watch TV.

Answer 739

too expensive. there are a lot of other things i need more...gas, food, etc..

Answer 740

My husband says it's better for sports.

Answer 741

Because there is nothing but garbage on TV.



*

Answer 742

There is nothing wrong with my old TV.

Answer 743

more positive programs for asians.

less bashing of asians.

my father and brother hates american tv.

Answer 744

Go buy a motorbike instead.. they are way more entertaining

:D

Answer 745

bff rose

Answer 746

I always wear a condom so hopefully i will never get it

Answer 747

Costs too much for me

Answer 748

I've still got good television sets. I don't think they are any better anyway, personally.

Answer 749

Because of its price that's why.

Answer 750

No need for it and the cost.

Answer 751

money. But it seems you are asking questions just for stars. This is just small talk question sorry.

Answer 752

they cost to much .

hey if u buy me one i will thank u lots !

Answer 753

i barely got money for rent how will i buy a new tv

Answer 754

Already have mine. I was going to wait, but an appliance store manager I know called me. He knows I'm a cheapskate and said they had a floor model for half off if I got down to the store fast enough.



So, instead of being a holdout, I am an owner. I like the reduced electricity bills already.

Answer 755

bob te builder knows i'm dead serouis call him

Answer 756

I have no money so as a poor person, you just dream on.

You are rich, send me one?

Answer 757

i like them for gaminggggg

Answer 758

WHAT CHEEPOUTS VERIZON IS THE WORST, THEY CANT EVEN PAY FOR A RESEARCH GROUP!!!!!!! GO AND GET FREE INFO FROM SOMEWHERE ELSE!!!!!!

Answer 759

To damn expensive

Answer 760

it is the matter of price

Answer 761

the fact that verizon's service sucks.

Answer 762

I got it because after(I forget the date) If you don't have it, you don't have TV unless you have cable.

Answer 763

it is very expensive. I hope there will be discounts.

Answer 764

price

Answer 765

No, the price.

Answer 766

price

Answer 767

i think verizon is too expensive pls some help here

https://answersrip.com/question/index?qid=20080902124402AA0S9X0

Answer 768

TV's are too expensive and service is too expensive..

Answer 769

I don't have the money. Too poor.

Answer 770

You need to remove your entry off my credit report!





I DONT OWE YOU 1,300!!



YOURE RUINING MY CREDIT!!

Answer 771

budget... im still planning to have one but not now.

Answer 772

$$$$$$$$$$

Answer 773

cost too much

Answer 774

not getting it because TV is lame...

Answer 775

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Answer 776

by the year 2010

all will change

you will have to have hdtv.

ask the usgov why?

best

Answer 777

I hate verizon.

Answer 778

I would like to see Real3d HD.

Answer 779

I watch television on occasion, but not much. The TV is very good, a 27" Sony flat screen CRT. I think that a converter box will suit me. I don't subscribe to cable, etc. I just pick up about ten local channels, some better than others.



If you want to buy a great big LCD or plasma TV, by all means do it. But that's the only reason. Unless all the publicity about converters is nonsense, spend the $20 - $60.

Answer 780

i dont know is my mom desicion

Answer 781

cost way to much.

Answer 782

i just want the clearest picture as possible. Its good and you can impress visitors as they come to your place and watch a HD movie.

Answer 783

I can't afford one until we get our tax check. Gas prices,food, rent all come first!

Answer 784

the reason for me owning a HDTV is to play my ps3 game and I am finally able to read the text more clearer.

Answer 785

Decision is effect by quility of chennl

Answer 786

the smaller tv is better

Answer 787

too expensive that s why

Answer 788

cost and inconvenience

Answer 789

I have HDTV and I wouldn't go back. I spent the money for a 55" HDTV and wanted HD programing to complete the package.

Its only $80/month for TV, not bad considering how much I watch TV.

Answer 790

They offer no porn channels whatsoever.

Answer 791

i thinks it's awesome

Answer 792

who knows?

Answer 793

u from becoming a couch potato... or or, turning obesse.

Answer 794

It's expensive and i'm skint!



---------------------------------------------------

Play Blobbeez Flash Game! >> http://www.blobology.com

Answer 795

CBS, FOXMO, FOX

Answer 796

It's too pricey...

Answer 797

TO MUCH MONEY FOR WHAT YOU GET.

Answer 798

my dad is too cheap

Answer 799

It's only TV...

Answer 800

None.

Answer 801

I have no use for it. I barely watch tv, I only watch locals and the picture that I have now is clear enough for me! I can waste my money on better things than upgrading a picture I dont watch anyway.

Answer 802

I cant afford it thats why...

Answer 803

it is too expensive

Answer 804

I can't afford it.

Answer 805

Mostly price, and no real reason at this stage.



Harriet

Answer 806

I have 2 HDTVs and here's why

* Having a slick slim tv is way cooler than the old CRT tvs which take up too much space.

* It's 2008 c'mon people $1,600 for a 46 inch TV is actually not bad.

* The picture is awesome and games look great.

* Visitors get jealous when they see my awesome tvs.



I am waiting for BBC, CNBC, BET, Current TV and G4TV to be in HD.



I am not worried too much about the price but FIOS isn't available in Long Island City where I live and that pisses me off.

Answer 807

Its a piece of luxury I really don't need. Even if I had that much money, I wouldn't buy it.

Answer 808

too much money

Answer 809

I also say, PRICE, PRICE, PRICE! While HD is great, the price of it right now is not, we can live without thanks.

Answer 810

The only thing that will affect my decision on whether to get HDTV or not is the money i.e.when the prices come down to where it is affordable to the regular working man, then maybe I'll get on the bandwagon, but with the price of everyday life continuously skyrocketing, well, HDTV is the least of my worries. What worries me more is feeding my family in this greed striken world in which we live. As I said, when the price becomes affordable, then I might decide. In the meantime if my regular t.v goes out then I might just do without until the market realizes America is tired of this.

Answer 811

TEH PRICE

Answer 812

It's not in my budget.

Answer 813

it probably cost more.

Answer 814

ONCE YOU SEE IT . IF YOU CAN AFFORD IT .THEN YOU MUST HAVE IT. IT'S COMPARING CELL PHONES TO JUNGLE DRUMS.

Answer 815

Don't need it. A'tall.

Answer 816

Its all what you can afford, luckily I can. =]

Or at least my family can.

Answer 817

because i dont NEED it

Answer 818

No FIOS in my area (HINT HINT VZ)

Answer 819

Too expensive and it's overrated.

Answer 820

I am waiting for the yard sales so I can get one for what it is worth.

Answer 821

the cost of it... i dont have any money

Answer 822

Price!



Geesh...why in the hell is it so expensive???

Answer 823

I got them for my xbox 360 but I mostly watch tv now. I love how the dvds look on them.

Answer 824

because the government said so......

Answer 825

suck my dick, yea ohh yea ur mouth feels so good oooohhh sexy harder harder!!

Answer 826

price!

Answer 827

i want to go to bed..

Answer 828

I'm to broke, stop making fun of me *****... **** VERIZON!

Answer 829

I'll wait until it is well-developed and archaic.

Answer 830

I have no need for HD since, my life is way more exciting than anything on TV.



I LIVE in HD, I don't need to pretend in HD.

Answer 831

I don't have the DAMN money!!!!

Answer 832

no money

Answer 833

price!!

Answer 834

I can't afford it!!!!!!

Answer 835

$$$$$$$$$$$$

$$$$$$$$$$$$

$$$$$$$$$$$$

$$$$$$$$$$$$

$$$$$$$$$$$$

Answer 836

becouse its awesome!!!! its worth the money!!!

Answer 837

COST

Answer 838

cus theyre cool and stuff

Answer 839

I got mine for the PS3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Answer 840

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

















thats about it.............

Answer 841

£££

Money/Cost.

Answer 842

Money to burn, business is good.



Definately better picture, i own 4 1080p sets all 32in except one 50 in lcd. More advanced everything and better quality. I'm a big movie/video game fan.

Answer 843

im waiting for all the channels

i wanna see how they look like

Answer 844

HDTVs are way overpriced for the small improvements in clarity they provide - when shows are even offered in HD anyway.

Answer 845

First, I don't watch very much TV. The current technology delivers an adequate image for what I do watch. Since I use a satellite system for television delivery, my signal is already digitally converted.



Second, I feel HDTV is currently overpriced. Once the conversion has been completed and is in place for a while the price of sets should come down to something more reasonable. In fact, HDTV receivers have come down in price already, and I expect they will continue to go down.



When the deal is right I will buy HDTV receivers. I expect this will be much the way things were when color television came in during the 1960's. The technology will become better and the prices will become more affordable.



If I want to be cutting edge anywhere I will buy a better computer.

Answer 846

I have two HD TVs and two older ones. Why did I get them over two years ago? Because I knew the time was coming when digital would be the norm as color was years ago. I do not have the digital supplement from the cable company because until now very few stations were digital.



If you don't have cable then you have to have the converter box for non-digital TV's.



Have you watched a show originally made in black and white then in color, well that is the difference of digital and not, HD and not.



Either way it is the same show on TV

Answer 847

MORE PORNOS YAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYYY

Answer 848

butt faces

Answer 849

i cant aford it thats why my popi got it for me (im a college student not a freeloader) but whats the difference sometimes lol

Answer 850

Why dont I get a HDTV plan? Well why are gas prices so expensive? Why are food prices on the rise? Why do colleges charge you for books when you're paying enough for tuition? Why do I have so much BS to pay for? Where can I get the time to even WATCH regular t.v.?

Answer 851

Price, make it more affordable, please.

Answer 852

SPORTS

Answer 853

PS3/XBOX360/BLU-RAY.

Answer 854

Blue ray is the future. HD will be gone soon.

Answer 855

First of all, why get something new when your old set still works? Seems like we throw away things in this culture when we really don't need to. Some people would love to have my 27 inch flat screen JVC TV that I paid $500 for in 2003. Why should I toss it and get a new one just to be the man and look like I have all the toys? My current TV works fine, the picture and sound are great, and I won't need a new one for probably 10 years. By that time a HDTV will work properly and cost a normal amount of cash. Peace out player!

Answer 856

I do not want it because it does not make the programs any better.

Answer 857

No money.

Answer 858

I have seen HD TV and there is abso-freakin-lutely NO difference between HDTV and NOT-HDTV.

No, I'm not getting it.

And if that means I can't watch TV anymore forever, then big flippin' deal!

I'm more of doer than a spectator, anyway.

Answer 859

Cause I don't care about seeing TV so clearly. It's just TV. Just entertainment to waste time with.



They ought to work on improving more important technologies.

Answer 860

I have a HDTV and what happens is once you experience it for yourself you'll never go back to anything else. I used to be the type of person that told myself a TV is a freaking TV regardless HD or not. We can talk about the same shows about the same thing. The only difference is you saw it in HD and I didn't big deal. I still watched the same thing you did. But I could have been no more wrong. HDTV is amazing and like I said you'll never go back. If you ever watch the full 1080p you will be blown away by the pictures. The best thing that has ever happen to TV and not just the flat screen invention but HD itself.

Answer 861

Well, I like HDTV because it's the future of the TV. And I'm young, I don't want to keep on getting relatively older technologies.

Answer 862

My dad's too lazy to get one. And I don't really watch tv that much, since my dad doesn't want to pay for cable.



But an HDTV would rock!



Edit:: I like how I'm getting lots of these thumbs down. It's the truth. My dad's too lazy to get a new TV and we're content with what we already have. And I'm completely fine without cable. If one doesn't have cable, why would one buy one? I'm saying what my reasons are, and they vary from person to person. These ill-decisive people need to realize that when they rate answers.

Answer 863

THE PRICE, you pay for cable and satellite TV and what kind of channels and programs do they have? INFOMERCIALS. so you pay for someone to sell YOU Something? and you cant chose which channels you want, but have to buy the whole package?

Answer 864

Well, with the cost of food rising, the worth of my house dropping (but not the taxes I pay on it), gas prices rising, the economy tanking and taking my retirement savings with it...



Let's just say I've got other things to spend my money on.

Answer 865

Costs of TV, I heard it takes more electricity to run it. (Not verified.)

Answer 866

The reason i am not getting an HDTV is simple. My know what my mind needs- that is a tube, flat screen tv with good sound. I have a 32 inch sony flat screen tube tv. This should last for at least seven years. Secondly, HDTV is very expensive. I paid just $250 for the Sony. A 32 LCD in sony may cost me at least 600. With the saved money i can buy many great essentials to keep me entertained.

Answer 867

Price is very prohibitive.

Answer 868

i find it too expensive.

channels not having the HD capability also play a factor.

Cost is the biggest factor

Answer 869

Price price price. Price of TV and price of HD package.

Answer 870

HDTV is awesome because it comes in like so much more clear its amazing. I like it because i can understand what people are saying. On my other tv which doesn't have it i have to put the caption on the tv but then i cant see half of whats on tv. Everything is cleaner and more clear. I think some of this is still based on your tv. But when you are watching movies it is like u are in a movie theater.

Answer 871

IDK

Answer 872

The one TV I have works fine.



I make $55,000 a year. No matter what, I simply cannot justify spending SO MUCH money on a television.

Answer 873

It's too much. I want it, but look at the economy. There's no way I'm pouring my money into a tv when I have to pay $80 for a tank of gas. I'm already paying too much for phone, internet, and cable.

Answer 874

I got satellite TV and I'm really disappointed with the shows that constantly repeat. It seems like the stations have calculated the cheapest way to put programming on the air, so they can maximize their income. One station constantly shows Fresh Prince shows over and over and over. There are a lot of great comedies. Why not a different one every half hour?



Most of the stations contain junk. Many of the hours, I have trouble finding one show to watch. When I do, the show is not all that entertaining. I like true crime, but those shows are all repeats too.



I have an old television and that works fine. I just don't value television enough to spend more than $300 on a television set. I don't need a huge set that is difficult to move either. Additionally, my satellite just works with one television. When my television wears out and the price of flat screens comes down, I'll probably get one of those. I don't have any idea if all new TVs are high-definition or not. I'd probably appreciate clarity, but I don't think I want to pay much for it.

Answer 875

What kind of HD are we talking?



HD720i

HD720p

HD1080i

HD1080p ("True HD")



It would be great to have truth in advertising. The letters "HD" is a generic marketing term that does not give specificity as to what you are really getting. One has to also have understanding of the different levels of HD, as above.



So it's very annoying and misleading to say one has a HD TV when the term HD is not defined.



So, when it is defined, and we can all discuss the same thing, please ask the question again.



Cost will ALWAYS be a factor for consumers.

Answer 876

I have HDTV and because: Everything is clearer and sharper and you can actually read the word on the screen.



Some people who don't get HDTV may not afford it, I think that's the main reason.

Answer 877

I'm not going to get a HDTV until all the TVs I have now are broken. I have a satellite dish which converts signals to digital, and that's good enough for me.